You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-10   10-14         
 
Author Message
5 new of 14 responses total.
tpryan
response 10 of 14: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 19:20 UTC 1998

        Like giving them something to do every day?
dang
response 11 of 14: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 02:32 UTC 1999

resp:7 I would guess the major stumbling block in traditional scenarios 
is building the space station.  However, we're already doing that.  If 
we have a space station, why not use it to enhance the mission?  You 
don't have to get too elaborate.  
russ
response 12 of 14: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 13:25 UTC 1999

resp 42
Re #11:  Okay, what would you enhance?
 
The "traditional" view of the mission-staged-at-a-space-station had
the station acting in one or more of these roles:  fuel depot for the
deep-space ship, final assembly plant for the deep-space ship, quarters
for the crew and assembly workers, and isolation site for people and
samples returning from other planets.
 
The ISS doesn't have much in the way of room for extra crew, has no
tankage facilities or assembly bays, and no isolation labs.  On the
other hand, it has plenty of costs that the administrators would love
to bill to other projects (like Mars missions).
 
I suppose the question is:  even if you could possibly use it, would you?
dang
response 13 of 14: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 22:44 UTC 1999

I don't know.  I don't know much about ISS, it's function, or it's 
capabilities.  
russ
response 14 of 14: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 12:56 UTC 1999

For information on ISS, you should visit NASA's web site.
 0-10   10-14         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss