|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 7 new of 16 responses total. |
arianna
|
|
response 10 of 16:
| 
Mar 10 02:44 UTC 2000 |
my fw sense kicks in as a precursor to this response to tell me that it's only
half on the topic, but hey, I'll venture boldly forward anyway... (;
I don't see anything wrong in fantasizing as long as a line can be
drawn and everything; I think that healthy acts of dominance in the
bedroom are NOT enactments of rape fantasy. Two consenting adults that
chose to play the strong/weak roles for mutual pleasure is very different
than someone chosing to be violently dominant over someone who is not
technically a *partner*. Okay, so maybe being a "partner" is an oxymoron
when both ends of the strong/weak gamut are being played out, but when I
say partner, I mean someone who CONSENTED to be tied down by someone who
is ALLOWED to be the one doing the tying.
<steps off the soap box and returns to being a bacground observer>
|
jazz
|
|
response 11 of 16:
|
Mar 12 01:23 UTC 2000 |
I don't think that anyone would argue with you there, or that either
party would run into legal difficulty unless they ran up against an unrepealed
technicality or their rape-fantasy scene was mistaken for the real thing by
police.
|
brighn
|
|
response 12 of 16:
|
Mar 12 15:35 UTC 2000 |
Rape fantasy role-playing and Dom/sub role-playing are two different things.
In both cases, though, the participants are "partners" since participation
is consensual.
|
arianna
|
|
response 13 of 16:
|
Mar 12 20:34 UTC 2000 |
(what he said. (; )
|
ponder
|
|
response 14 of 16:
|
Mar 14 01:59 UTC 2000 |
resp:9 the problem with the fantasy
(IMHO) is that some people (I mean
both men and women) have a tendency
to need to carry things beyond the level
of just pure fantasy. Acting out one's
fantasies is not new material. Sad isn't
it.
|
brighn
|
|
response 15 of 16:
|
Mar 14 16:06 UTC 2000 |
That's not a problem with fantasy. That's a problem of will-power and ethical
decay.
,
|
ponder
|
|
response 16 of 16:
|
Mar 15 02:07 UTC 2000 |
true, I guess.
|