You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-10   10-14         
 
Author Message
5 new of 14 responses total.
cmcgee
response 10 of 14: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 18:12 UTC 2006

After reading further in this conference, I'm satisfied that the board moved
ahead with this problem.  I had missed that this was the October minutes.
cross
response 11 of 14: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 04:18 UTC 2006

(Or, if not me, then anybody....)
naftee
response 12 of 14: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 07:37 UTC 2006

cyklone's resp:8 is bang on
eteepell
response 13 of 14: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 21:09 UTC 2007

I'm thinking it would be good to open up the restriction a little, perhaps
anyone using root for any purpose should provide good documentation on
changes being done, have some core members approve changes quickely by
concensus. Let the board decide a specific ceiling to the gravity of changes
made. ie.
allow control of root to 3 people
board decides root for maintenance only, and allowing trusted access to solve
spam, denial of service issue(s).
a trusted admin proposes solution to issue (ie. spam). admin posts complete
documentation of solution.
the same 3 people discuss issue, wait for comments, if solution is not going
to break something, and no negative comments, root is given. solution is
applied.
Just a thought.
Is anyone thinking anything like that? What I'm thinking would obviously have
to be discussed and changed dramatically.

cross
response 14 of 14: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 04:16 UTC 2007

That's actually not a bad idea.
 0-10   10-14         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss