|
Grex > Coop > #255: Nominations Open for 2010 Board | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 95 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 1 of 95:
| 
Nov 16 15:29 UTC 2009 |
I nominate Denise and cyclone.
|
tod
|
|
response 2 of 95:
|
Nov 16 19:31 UTC 2009 |
I nominate unicorn and denise
|
denise
|
|
response 3 of 95:
|
Nov 16 20:44 UTC 2009 |
I nominate remmers, mary, and glenda.
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 4 of 95:
|
Nov 16 23:13 UTC 2009 |
Lest we forget: Nominations must be accepted in this item, before
voting begins. Self-nominations are acceptable and are usually
interpreted as accepting the nomination, as well.
|
tod
|
|
response 5 of 95:
|
Nov 17 00:06 UTC 2009 |
I nominate tangodancer, womble, and ringbark
|
tsty
|
|
response 6 of 95:
|
Nov 17 00:39 UTC 2009 |
i endors the nominaoin of cyklone adn denise
|
tsty
|
|
response 7 of 95:
|
Nov 18 02:27 UTC 2009 |
and add remmers to the above
|
mary
|
|
response 8 of 95:
|
Nov 18 10:35 UTC 2009 |
Mary won't be running for the board this election. Thanks for the
nomination though.
|
denise
|
|
response 9 of 95:
|
Nov 22 00:17 UTC 2009 |
If we could keep Grex going I would be willing to serve on the board.
Dunno what's going to be happening, though.
|
tsty
|
|
response 10 of 95:
|
Nov 22 05:06 UTC 2009 |
i;d liek to nomnate katie for board
|
unicorn
|
|
response 11 of 95:
|
Nov 22 05:07 UTC 2009 |
I would also be willing to serve, although I admit I haven't been very
active lately. I would also like to nominate tod if it isn't too late
for that, since he was willing and interested during the last election.
|
tsty
|
|
response 12 of 95:
|
Nov 22 06:20 UTC 2009 |
unicorn! goo dto heare from you ...
i nominate unicorn and kentn
|
steve
|
|
response 13 of 95:
|
Nov 23 22:08 UTC 2009 |
I am running again.
|
katie
|
|
response 14 of 95:
|
Nov 24 00:20 UTC 2009 |
No, thank you. Thanks for thinking of me.
|
tsty
|
|
response 15 of 95:
|
Nov 24 00:45 UTC 2009 |
tnx steve ... sorry about katie theough.
|
tsty
|
|
response 16 of 95:
|
Nov 24 01:47 UTC 2009 |
ok unicorn, i;ll consider 11 to be a self-nomination and if others
disagree, then i nominate unicorn.
|
kentn
|
|
response 17 of 95:
|
Nov 24 14:46 UTC 2009 |
I'll give it a shot.
|
unicorn
|
|
response 18 of 95:
|
Nov 24 16:47 UTC 2009 |
Actually, tod nominated me in #2, and you nominated me in #12, so
your nomination in #16 makes 3. ;)
|
remmers
|
|
response 19 of 95:
|
Nov 24 16:59 UTC 2009 |
Joe Gelinas asked if I'd run the election this time around, which
basically involves setting up and running the voting software. I've not
been a staff member for a few years, but I'm very familiar with the
voting software - having written it - so I'll be happy to do it.
Since Grex has been down for a couple of days, I respectfully suggest
extending the nomination period correspondingly.
Voting runs from December 1 through 15. Nominees have through November
30 to accept a nomination, which they must do in this item. You also
have to be a member in good standing by the time the polls open in order
to be a candidate.
|
denise
|
|
response 20 of 95:
|
Nov 24 17:07 UTC 2009 |
Thanks for helping out, John! And I agree that we should extend the
nomination period since Grex had been down for a couple days.
|
tsty
|
|
response 21 of 95:
|
Nov 24 18:38 UTC 2009 |
tnx remmers ... and i agree with the extehnsion ...
please link to agora - tia
|
denise
|
|
response 22 of 95:
|
Nov 24 22:03 UTC 2009 |
Just as a reminder: Any more nominations to be made should be done
within the next day or so [extending the deadline by 2 days since Grex
had been down earlier this week]. As remmmers mentioned, we have til
late November to accept or decline nominations that have been posted
here in this item.
|
richard
|
|
response 23 of 95:
|
Nov 24 22:52 UTC 2009 |
as stated in item #256, I think anyone running for the board should
only do so if they have a clear idea of what they want for grex. If
you are willing to help wind down the company over the next year.and
consider future options for what should happen with the bbs and the
hardware thats good. But grex doesn't need board members who are
running reluctantly, who won't attend the meetings and won't consider
being treasurer, or secretary or anything that involves doing any of
the work.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 24 of 95:
|
Nov 25 00:43 UTC 2009 |
Thanks for the nomination, but I, like nate, must decline for
employment-related reasons.
|
jep
|
|
response 25 of 95:
|
Nov 25 04:01 UTC 2009 |
I believe I see enough nominees who have accepted to fill the open spots.
Denise, Chuck and STeve are running for re-election; Kent has nominated
himself, and Todd Plesco, Glenda Andre and John Remmers have been
nominated and not declined. There will be a full Board. There will even
be a contest if Todd, Glenda and/or John accept. I find this encouraging.
|