|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 72 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 1 of 72:
| 
Oct 20 18:52 UTC 2003 |
Yesterday at the library some man was yelling loudly for about ten minutes
(to himself, as the rest of us tried to ignore him), presumably at someone
near him who had been using a cell phone in the library, where you are not
expected to be carrying on a conversation (or yelling). I don't see how it
would matter in a restaurant.
What is a Hummer?
|
cross
|
|
response 2 of 72:
|
Oct 20 19:16 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 3 of 72:
|
Oct 21 00:01 UTC 2003 |
resp:0 it's interesting how left-wingers and right-wingers, so to
speak, are both on there ;>
|
rcurl
|
|
response 4 of 72:
|
Oct 21 00:52 UTC 2003 |
But not surprising.... I presume those opposites were on the survey, and
the electorate is split near 50-50 on many things.
|
remmers
|
|
response 5 of 72:
|
Oct 21 02:26 UTC 2003 |
Walmart didn't make the weaseliest company list? How strange.
|
sabre
|
|
response 6 of 72:
|
Oct 21 02:54 UTC 2003 |
The weaseliest liberal forum..GREX
The weaseliest grexer.........remmers
remmers..you are one SLEAZY weasel.
I think jaklulantern should give you his billy goat gruff routine
You actually resemble an ole goat....with that nasty goatee of yours
|
mcnally
|
|
response 7 of 72:
|
Oct 21 06:02 UTC 2003 |
#6 is almost totally pointless but it does manage to suggest an idea
that intrigues me -- I wonder what remmers is like when angry.
As much as I've enjoyed his company on the occasions when we've met,
I have at best a casual acquaintance with him. Certainly I'm not the
best judge, but I find it almost impossible to imagine him fuming mad.
Can anyone else picture that? (One thing I *do* know for sure, though:
sabre is going to have to work a lot harder if he ever wants to see it.)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 8 of 72:
|
Oct 21 06:19 UTC 2003 |
sabre only diminishes himself by his gratuitous and juvenile jabs at
various people.
|
janc
|
|
response 9 of 72:
|
Oct 21 14:34 UTC 2003 |
Notice the Democratic party ranked as more weasely than the Republican
Party. Finally, Bush's strategy makes sense. But running the
Weaseliest White House in history, he draws all the weasely votes off
from his party, making it look better than the Democratic party.
Scott Adams definitely tilted this survey. Why weren't cartoonists
listed among the choices for weaseliest occupations?
|
gull
|
|
response 10 of 72:
|
Oct 21 14:59 UTC 2003 |
I'd say there's plenty to offend everyone in #0. ;>
|
gull
|
|
response 11 of 72:
|
Oct 21 15:18 UTC 2003 |
Re #9: It does look like having both The White House and The Republican
Party on the same list split the Republican weasel vote.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 12 of 72:
|
Oct 21 16:29 UTC 2003 |
Either that or another on-line poll got "Freeped"..
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 13 of 72:
|
Oct 24 16:17 UTC 2003 |
Ah yes, Wal-mart. The store of family values, savings, and cheap
migrant labor.
|
remmers
|
|
response 14 of 72:
|
Oct 24 16:53 UTC 2003 |
Wal-Mart just got raided over the latter. How embarassing. Couldn't
happen to a nicer giant corporation.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 15 of 72:
|
Oct 24 17:14 UTC 2003 |
Yep...they got busted in several states, including Michigan.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 16 of 72:
|
Oct 24 17:31 UTC 2003 |
I thought I read it was a contractor to Wal-Mart, not Wal-Mart, who
got "busted".
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 17 of 72:
|
Oct 24 17:40 UTC 2003 |
The migrant workers were busted...I think the Wal-mart sotres were the
site of the raids...I'll have to re-read the article.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 18 of 72:
|
Oct 24 18:07 UTC 2003 |
The illegal aliens get busted for being illegal, but won't the company
that hired them, the contractor, also be indicted for giving them employment?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 19 of 72:
|
Oct 24 18:36 UTC 2003 |
I believe so. Wal-mart may also face problems, if it cannot be proven
that they had nothing to do--deliberately--with hiring illegals.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 20 of 72:
|
Oct 24 18:57 UTC 2003 |
Shouldn't that be the other way? "Wal-mart may also face problems, if it can
be proven that they knew about the hiring of illegal aliens"? Innocent 'til
proven guilty, and all that?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 21 of 72:
|
Oct 24 19:21 UTC 2003 |
That's what one would think
|
other
|
|
response 22 of 72:
|
Oct 24 19:33 UTC 2003 |
Wal-Mart CONTRACTED someone to fill positions, which they did using
illegals. This was probably solely for plausible deniability.
|
goose
|
|
response 23 of 72:
|
Oct 24 19:59 UTC 2003 |
One NPR report talked about Wal-Mart executives being on tape talking about
these illegals. So they may have evidence of knowledge.
|
tod
|
|
response 24 of 72:
|
Oct 24 20:17 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
krj
|
|
response 25 of 72:
|
Oct 24 22:02 UTC 2003 |
My recollection of the news stories is that the Feds have executed
searches at Wal-Mart corporate offices in this case.
|