You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-9   10-34   35-59   60-84   85-109   110-115     
 
Author Message
jp2
Member Resolution Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:24 UTC 2004

This item has been erased.

115 responses total.
gelinas
response 1 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:28 UTC 2004

I really hope you will reconsider and not bring this to a vote, jp2.
It should be obvious that it will fail, and probably by an even larger
margin.  For example, I voted in favour of the motion the first time.
I will vote against it the next time, and on any subsequent occassions.

We lost.  Get over it.  Move on.
jp2
response 2 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:32 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 3 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:32 UTC 2004

But it is NOT going to be undone.
jp2
response 4 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:33 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tod
response 5 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:38 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 6 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 19:22 UTC 2004

Apparently we do need a bylaw revision calling for a period before revoting, 
to stop Jamie from introducing this proposal a third time around the end of 
February.
ryan
response 7 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 19:24 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 8 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 19:51 UTC 2004

So, how about those Grammy awards, eh?    I heard the White Stripes had a
pretty good appearance, did anyone else catch them?
jp2
response 9 of 115: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 19:55 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

 0-9   10-34   35-59   60-84   85-109   110-115     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss