|
Grex > Coop > #269: Opening up the staff conference? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
cross
|
|
Opening up the staff conference?
| 
Feb 18 00:05 UTC 2010 |
I'd like to propose that we open up the staff conferences to the general
public. Sensitive matters could, if need be, be discussed via email (with
a record kept on the Google Group's archive).
|
| 49 responses total. |
tsty
|
|
response 1 of 49:
|
Feb 18 04:29 UTC 2010 |
ummmmmmmm, no.
|
cross
|
|
response 2 of 49:
|
Feb 18 05:51 UTC 2010 |
Why not?
|
krj
|
|
response 3 of 49:
|
Feb 18 17:12 UTC 2010 |
Is it proposed that this be done with a staff conference restart,
so that new material is public?
Or is it proposed to open up the archives to the public?
|
cross
|
|
response 4 of 49:
|
Feb 19 03:44 UTC 2010 |
I think we should open up the archives.
|
tonster
|
|
response 5 of 49:
|
Feb 19 16:35 UTC 2010 |
I think there are reasons to keep aspects of a staff conference private,
particularly if they contain information related to specific steps on
how things are done on the system. I like the way m-net has set this up
for that reason. stuff in sysop is public, stuff in staff is private.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 6 of 49:
|
Feb 19 18:40 UTC 2010 |
Kinda like Grex's garage cf?
|
denise
|
|
response 7 of 49:
|
Feb 19 19:59 UTC 2010 |
I agree that there may be some aspects/stuff that should be kept
confidential.
|
tonster
|
|
response 8 of 49:
|
Feb 19 21:57 UTC 2010 |
resp:6: I'm a member of garage, but have never really participated, so
quite possibly garage is equivalent to sysop. If that's the case, then
I don't think any changes are necessary. I would also say I wouldn't be
surprised if there were many things in staff that would have been more
appropriate for the open garage.cf.
|
cross
|
|
response 9 of 49:
|
Feb 20 17:04 UTC 2010 |
I think Grex needs more transparency.
|