| Grex > Agora47 > #99: THIS IA A TEST TO SEE IF THAT FATASS SLYNNE HAS EVERYONE IN HER TWIT FILTER |
| THIS IA A TEST TO SEE IF THAT FATASS SLYNNE HAS EVERYONE IN HER TWIT FILTER | 
Oct 17 20:51 UTC 2003 |
She claimed in the partial birth abortion thread that EVERYONE is in her twit filter. Therefore the test
| response 1 of 52: |
Oct 18 00:45 UTC 2003 |
Oh good grief. Slynne is probably in the list of top ten people the least likely to have a twit filter. Do you believe everything people tell you?
| response 2 of 52: |
Oct 18 19:20 UTC 2003 |
She made the claim herself.
| response 3 of 52: |
Oct 18 19:25 UTC 2003 |
She was kidding.
| response 4 of 52: |
Oct 18 21:26 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
| response 5 of 52: |
Oct 18 21:28 UTC 2003 |
re #0: In Usenet parlance, I think it goes something like this: YHBT. HAND.
| response 6 of 52: |
Oct 18 22:30 UTC 2003 |
I'm kidding too..no one has the skin needed for my sense of humor
| response 7 of 52: |
Oct 19 04:28 UTC 2003 |
re 1 janc, do you filter anyone?
| response 8 of 52: |
Oct 19 08:38 UTC 2003 |
Personally I never understood the reasoning behind "twit filters". If I wanted to "twit filter" I wouldn't even log into m-net in the first place. I would put my hands over my ears and shout out "I'm not Listening" at the top of my voice and I would keep an Sharpie(TM) majic marker on the dash when I drive the car to mark off those part of my glasses where unpleasant or ignorant things are seen. I think of it as evolution in action. Anyone stupid enough to use twit filters will probably be stupid enough to not be able to successfully breed (like russ?) and so the trait removes itself from the gene pool eventually.