other
|
|
Motion to reject ~usgov membership
| 
Apr 18 03:32 UTC 2001 |
In the interests of Grex, I as a member of Cyberspace Communications
Incorporated do hereby move that the application for institutional
membership by user usgov be rejected immediately, and that the check
provided to secure that membership be either returned or destroyed within
one week after passage of this motion.
See items 254 and 255 for details and discussion.
In two weeks, on 1 May 2001, this motion will be voted on by the
membership.
|
scg
|
|
response 2 of 23:
|
Apr 18 05:14 UTC 2001 |
I will be voting no on this too.
I am appalled by the tone the discussion of this issue has taken. Whether
Grex has changed, or whether I've just been expecting the wrong thing of it
I don't know, but I'm at a loss for how the Grex that's been reacting to this
membership request in this way can possibly be the system I've been enjoying
and supporting for so long.
This is a case of a user who has attempted to make a donation to Grex, and
receive a membership for that donation. Unfortunately, this user didn't quite
comply with Grex's membership policies, and had a name some people didn't
like, and has been treated with great hostility from the beginning. First
this was going on in private mail, and in fairness to the board and staff I
should point out that a good public face was put on the messages before they
were sent out to the potential donor. This person was then told, as people
who don't agree with Grex's policies generally are, that he was welcome to
debate the policies in Coop. So he comes to Coop, takes a somewhat hostile
tone but certainly no more hostile than some long time users who have been
encouraged to become members, and rather than discussing the issue people
throw insults at him. Perhaps he started with the insults in public first,
but that excuse wasn't good enough for my nursery school teachers.
Under Grex's current policy, Grex can't accept a membership on these terms.
However, there's certainly no reason to drag it through the mud the way that's
been done here. If an agreement can't be reached, Grex will need to return
the check, but it should be returned with an apology, not with the hostility
that's been shown so far.
Seeing how other Grexers are reacting when the "wrong sort of person" tries
to donate money (and tries to get a vote in Grex elections, although to be
fair this sort of membership doesn't include that anyway), I'm not at all sure
I'll feel comfortable renewing my membership when the time comes.
|
davel
|
|
response 3 of 23:
|
Apr 18 12:52 UTC 2001 |
I'll vote no on this, too. I favor the current ID policy. I see no need for
a motion singling out this turkey, though, & object to setting a precedent
for that kind of thing.
In other words, I favor doing what this motion says, but not having a motion
singling out a particular user for special treatment.
|