You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-6   7-31   32-56   57-81   82-106   107-131   132-154    
 
Author Message
richard
Bush administration wants to let United Arab Emirates control six U.S. ports Mark Unseen   Feb 20 19:18 UTC 2006

from cnn.com, Hillary Clinton is leading a fight against a Bush 
admnistration proposal to sell a company that operates six major U.S. 
ports to the United Arab Emirates:

"NEW YORK   Democratic senators Hillary Clinton of New York and Robert 
Menendez of New Jersey introduced legislation on Friday to prohibit 
companies owned or controlled by foreign governments from buying US 
port operations. 

The measure is intended to block the $6,8bn sale of a company that 
operates six US ports to a firm controlled by the United Arab Emirates.

 Our port security is too important to place in the hands of foreign 
governments,  Clinton said in a statement on Friday.

A bipartisan group of US legislators called on Thursday for hearings on 
the purchase of London-based Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation 
Company, the UK s largest port operator, by DP World, Dubai s port 
company. With the acquisition, DP World would gain control over most 
operations at ports in New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia, Miami, 
Baltimore and New Orleans. 

 Ports are the front lines of the war on terrorism,  Menendez said. 

 We wouldn t turn the border patrol or the customs service over to a 
foreign government, and we can t afford to turn our ports over to one 
either,  he said. 

Legislators have also asked the administration of President George Bush 
to conduct a more thorough review of the purchase. Seven sent a letter 
to Treasury Secretary John Snow, asking a government panel known as the 
committee on foreign investment in the US to look into the purchase. 

Snow said this month that while he had not seen the congressional 
requests for an additional review the committee was  thorough, and 
carefully considered the issue of national security in that 
acquisition. The process worked as it is intended to work,  Snow said 
in Chicago.

The departments of defence and homeland security had been part of the 
process, he said. 

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the administration 
continued to support the sale, and would brief congress on its 
decision.  It s the considered opinion of the US government that this 
can go forward,  Rice told a round table of Arab journalists at the 
state department in Washington. 

Rice said there had been a  thorough review  of the sale, and  it was 
decided that this could be done and done safely . 

She described Abu Dhabi as  a very good friend  of the US.  I hope our 
friends in Abu Dhabi would not be offended by the fact that in our 
democracy we debate these things. 

154 responses total.
richard
response 1 of 154: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 19:23 UTC 2006

So United Arab Emirates got the high bid, $6.8 billion, to take over 
the operations of six major U.S. ports.  This is all about greed and 
quid pro quo.  Those people over in Dubai are quite tight with the 
Texas oil interests, who are Bush's main people.  So Bush wants this 
deal to go through because he wants his people to keep seeing the money 
flow from Dubai.  It is payola, the UAE gets control of the ports, they 
take care of Bush's Texas oil friends.

I think Clinton is right, this deal should be stopped.  Sometimes you 
don't need always need to take the highest bid.  There is no reason 
these six ports, including here in NYC, should not be run by an 
AMERICAN company.    
nharmon
response 2 of 154: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 19:33 UTC 2006

Yeah, because American companies are so trustworthy.
richard
response 3 of 154: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 19:38 UTC 2006

nharmon, so are you saying our government should contract out all its 
business with overseas countries because you think american companies 
are untrustworthy?  

It seems like good sense, in these times, to keep certain businesses- 
such as those running our ports-- here in the States.  
edina
response 4 of 154: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 19:43 UTC 2006

Richard, can you simply ask "what do you mean by that" rather than planting
words in someone's mouth?
richard
response 5 of 154: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 19:49 UTC 2006

re #4 I phrased it as a question, I didn't put any words in his mouth.  
I simply asked if that was what he meant, because he specifically 
brought up american companies and not being trustworthy.
bru
response 6 of 154: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 20:30 UTC 2006

On the surface it sounds like a bad idea.  But the people in charge of
security at the port would not change.

The British were already running the port so it isn't like it was a local
business going to an overseas company for the first time.  It was already
overseas.
 0-6   7-31   32-56   57-81   82-106   107-131   132-154    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss