You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-4   5-29   30-54   55-79   80-104   105-129   130-151    
 
Author Message
scott
Computer references changing written language? Mark Unseen   Nov 12 18:42 UTC 2000

So how are computers affecting the English language?  I mean aside from the
obvious jargon and so forth.

For instance, using URLs in text is where I got to thinking about this. 
Systems like Grex that make URLs clickable tend to have less than perfect
rules, so things like periods might cause a problem in a URL.  Periods are
needed to end sentences, though!  So while you might say: "Check out
http://xxx.com.", it might work better as "Check out http://xxx.com for
more info.", or some other way to move the punctuation away from the URL.
151 responses total.
otter
response 1 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:30 UTC 2000

I have solved it by hitting the <spacebar> an extra time before and after 
a URL.
You pose an interesting question. I often find myself wanting to resort 
to an emoticon in regular correspondence, because it is much easier than 
phrasing my prose to reflect a wink or a chuckle. But I don't.
swa
response 2 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:33 UTC 2000

(Yes, xxx.com is exactly what it sounds like... what sort of info did you
have in mind for us to find out there, Scott? ;))

What gives me difficulties is that a lot of computer terms don't seem to
be standardized.  Is "e-mail" hyphenated?  Is "website" one word or two?
I've seen both written both ways frequently enough that I have no idea
which is correct.  Plus, as there are more and more new terms, sometimes
there *isn't* really an established "correct" version.  I'm not, you know,
losing sleep over this, but I like to spell things correctly when I can.

And I've run into the period-at-the-end-of-the-URL problem a lot, where it
seems like it would be more concise to say (for example) "Over 300,000
explicit photos can be found at http://xxx.com.," but I have to rearrange
it to avoid that problem.  Even saying, "At http://xxx.com, one can find
over 300,000 explicit photos." screws it up with the comma.  So you have
to say something like, "The explicit photos at http://xxx.com number over
300,000.," which just doesn't sound as good.
swa
response 3 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:38 UTC 2000

Kae slipped in while I was rambling about explicit photos.  ;)  Yeah, I've
found that I end up writing more lazily the more time I spend online.
Typing a smiley face takes less work than typing, "This makes me happy,"
and typing "<sigh>" takes less work than typing, "This makes me
exasperated."  But it seems like cheating.  I guess that if you rely on
the assumption that these symbols mean the same things to everyone, then
it's still communication.  But it makes me feel lazy, although I usually do
it anyway.

ea
response 4 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:56 UTC 2000

Ummm, this may screw up your whole theory, but I'm using backtalk, and 
Grex did not add the period or the comma to the url in the example, 
http://xxx.com.  I've been on other systems that will screw it up, but 
grex seems pretty good about it.
 0-4   5-29   30-54   55-79   80-104   105-129   130-151    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss