You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-4   5-29   30-54   55-79   80-104   105-129   130-154   155-179   180-204 
 205-229   230-235         
 
Author Message
gelinas
A Proposal to Clarify Grex's Stance on Deleting Items Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:23 UTC 2004

From all the discussion to date, I think we're approaching a consensus that
items should be removed from conferences only in very obvious circumstances,
such as those involving illegal behaviour.  I'd like to see that consensus
consolidated and clarified.  Therefore, I am making yet another proposal
on the subject.

I am looking for a single vote, yes or no, that will settle the question
until someone brings it up again.

    Resolved:   An item's author, the person who entered the
                item in a conference, shall have the authority
                to remove that item from the original conference
                and any conferences to which it has been linked.
                If the software installed on grex does not give
                the author sufficient capability, the author may
                seek assistance from staff and fairwitnesses.

   If the above resolution fails, the following paragraph will be adopted
   as a member resolution:

        An item's author may remove an item at any time before a
        response has been made to it.  After a response has been
        made, an item may be removed only if it poses a clear and
        present danger to the system or it clearly abets criminal
        activity.  Examples of the former include a very large item
        that fills all available disk space, an item that is posted
        more than once or in several conferences at once and items
        that contain terminal escape sequences.  Examples of the
        latter include items that contain social security numbers
        or credit card numbers.
235 responses total.
gelinas
response 1 of 235: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:27 UTC 2004

I would prefer one vote, yes to adopt the first paragraph and no to adopt
the second.  However, I am open to presenting each paragraph as a separate
proposal, if we cannot settle on acceptable working of each paragraph.
aruba
response 2 of 235: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:31 UTC 2004

I don't like eother of those options, Joe.  So I wouldn't know which way to
vote on your proposal.
gelinas
response 3 of 235: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:37 UTC 2004

Is there something you would prefer?
boltwitz
response 4 of 235: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 23:44 UTC 2004

Because those aren't opposites, it's silly to pretend they are.
 0-4   5-29   30-54   55-79   80-104   105-129   130-154   155-179   180-204 
 205-229   230-235         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss