You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-3   4-28   29-53   54-72       
 
Author Message
krj
The Eighteenth "Napster" Item Mark Unseen   Apr 11 07:00 UTC 2004

Napster the original corporation has been destroyed, its trademarks
now owned by an authorized music retailer.  But the Napster 
paradigm, in which computers and networks give ordinary people 
unprecedented control over intellectual property, continues.  

This is another quarterly installment in a series of weblog
and discussion about the deconstruction of the music industry and
other copyright industries, with side forays into
'intellectual property, freedom of expression, electronic media,
corporate control, and evolving technology,' as polygon once
phrased it.

Several years of back items are easily found in the music2 and music3
conferences, covering discussions all the way back to the initial
popularity of the MP3 format.

72 responses total.
starship
response 1 of 72: Mark Unseen   Apr 11 12:36 UTC 2004

Yes, its illigal. But, coping music off the internet isnt REALLY as bad as
the music industry makes it sound. They are all just power and money hogs that
wouldnt give a shit if a person at a lower position then them died, as long
as they didin't make any money. They've got plenty of cash, and i don't really
think it would affect the music writers or producers much if they lost just
a bit of it to those in a lesser position.

Pardon me if I'm wrong but thats just my opinion.
other
response 2 of 72: Mark Unseen   Apr 11 15:18 UTC 2004

Yes, you're wrong.  Copying music off the internet, per se, is not 
illegal.
starship
response 3 of 72: Mark Unseen   Apr 11 17:54 UTC 2004

uhh yah... all those people that have been sued cause the d/l'd music off the
internet kinda should tell u its illigal
 0-3   4-28   29-53   54-72       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss