| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
|
ball |
There is talk of replacing the (broken) car driven by Mrs. ball with a "mini-van". We have found that installing a child seat significantly reduces useable space, especially when it is occupied (no folding down the rear seats, piling up boxes in the rear passenger seat etc.) Ballmobile II should be as fuel-efficient as is practical (E-85? Mrs. ball will veto BioDiesel), should be reliable and hopefully not be absolutely horrible to drive. | ||
| 91 responses total. | |||
|
keesan |
How fuel-efficient is practical? Our 1986 Toyota got at least 40 miles per gallon on hills. | ||
|
ball |
Presumably downhill. The 2005 Toyota station wagon that I drive yielded about 32 miles per gallon (about 7 l/100km) when it was new. I haven't checked recently. That's with a small, docile 1.9 litre 4-cylinder gasoline (petrol) engine. | ||
|
keesan |
We got this going up and down steep hills in Vermont, actually it was closer to 50 mpg. | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss