You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-3   4-28   29-53   54-78   79-103   104-128   129-151    
 
Author Message
scott
Computer references changing written language? Mark Unseen   Nov 12 18:42 UTC 2000

So how are computers affecting the English language?  I mean aside from the
obvious jargon and so forth.

For instance, using URLs in text is where I got to thinking about this. 
Systems like Grex that make URLs clickable tend to have less than perfect
rules, so things like periods might cause a problem in a URL.  Periods are
needed to end sentences, though!  So while you might say: "Check out
http://xxx.com.", it might work better as "Check out http://xxx.com for
more info.", or some other way to move the punctuation away from the URL.
151 responses total.
otter
response 1 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:30 UTC 2000

I have solved it by hitting the <spacebar> an extra time before and after 
a URL.
You pose an interesting question. I often find myself wanting to resort 
to an emoticon in regular correspondence, because it is much easier than 
phrasing my prose to reflect a wink or a chuckle. But I don't.
swa
response 2 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:33 UTC 2000

(Yes, xxx.com is exactly what it sounds like... what sort of info did you
have in mind for us to find out there, Scott? ;))

What gives me difficulties is that a lot of computer terms don't seem to
be standardized.  Is "e-mail" hyphenated?  Is "website" one word or two?
I've seen both written both ways frequently enough that I have no idea
which is correct.  Plus, as there are more and more new terms, sometimes
there *isn't* really an established "correct" version.  I'm not, you know,
losing sleep over this, but I like to spell things correctly when I can.

And I've run into the period-at-the-end-of-the-URL problem a lot, where it
seems like it would be more concise to say (for example) "Over 300,000
explicit photos can be found at http://xxx.com.," but I have to rearrange
it to avoid that problem.  Even saying, "At http://xxx.com, one can find
over 300,000 explicit photos." screws it up with the comma.  So you have
to say something like, "The explicit photos at http://xxx.com number over
300,000.," which just doesn't sound as good.
swa
response 3 of 151: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 19:38 UTC 2000

Kae slipped in while I was rambling about explicit photos.  ;)  Yeah, I've
found that I end up writing more lazily the more time I spend online.
Typing a smiley face takes less work than typing, "This makes me happy,"
and typing "<sigh>" takes less work than typing, "This makes me
exasperated."  But it seems like cheating.  I guess that if you rely on
the assumption that these symbols mean the same things to everyone, then
it's still communication.  But it makes me feel lazy, although I usually do
it anyway.

 0-3   4-28   29-53   54-78   79-103   104-128   129-151    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss