You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-39         
 
Author Message
cmcgee
History of Music in two semesters Mark Unseen   Jun 5 19:07 UTC 2001

Suppose I wanted to take a course entitled "History of Music".  Like History
of Art, it could be divided by time periods, and would start at a very early
time, and progressively lead me through to, say, 2001.  

Throughout the course, the professors would use recordings of the music (like
slides of art) to demonstrate the points they were making, show connections
and influences, and otherwise walk me through the development of American 21st
century music.

If you were developing this course, where would you start, and what music
would you include as an example?  How would it unfold?  What music would
you play for each lecture?  Assume that you have about 25 3 hour segments,
or the equivalent of two semesters of my attention.  Also assume total
musical naivete on the part of your students.


39 responses total.
eeyore
response 1 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 02:26 UTC 2001

Actually, Pioneer offers a Humanities course which includes Music History.
If I remember correctly, they started the musical part  seriously with
Gregorian chants, although we did hear some recordings of "What we think the
music might have sounded like".
cmcgee
response 2 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 13:59 UTC 2001

Interesting.  Has anyone every tried to recreate "Greek" or "Roman" music?
krj
response 3 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 00:02 UTC 2001

We have a CD which claims to be most of what's available from ancient
Greece, and the one small fragment that's available from Rome.  
(Or maybe I have it backwards.)
Recreating anything before the development of notation which we can 
read today is somewhat speculative, I would think.
 
cmcgee sure likes the big questions.  :)  In the 20th century, the 
two key American players in the first half of the century are probably
Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington, but I don't listen to Armstrong much
and I listen to Ellington all the time.  For the early stuff I would 
look for an RCA-label compilation covering the late 1930s and early 1940s.
I think the most recent such one was called "Beyond Category," but 
RCA spiffs up their Ellington material and reissues it every few
years.
albaugh
response 4 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 07:50 UTC 2001

Do not - I repeat, do NOT - miss the opportunity to make it a history of music
OF THE WORLD course!  You need Asian music covered.  Freak out on some Tibetan
monk chants!  Get the idea?  ;-)
eeyore
response 5 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 11:30 UTC 2001

True....Humanitites was History of the Western World.
ashke
response 6 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 14:10 UTC 2001

And even then, they tend to skip over a lot of history that deserves attention
more, like the ancient cites, more on egypt, more on ancient pre-greecian
medeteranian civilizations...  They tended to focus more on what they thought
you needed to get out of it, rather than going through everything.  I hated
that class, but when I got to college, I loved it.  Had amazing amounts of
fun and learned things.
bro
response 7 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 13 18:33 UTC 2001

Hi
I love PINK FLOYD
And i hope someone would talk with me about them
hope there are many PINK FLOYD fans out there

Please reply

Bro
brorranum@hotmail.com
tpryan
response 8 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 00:01 UTC 2001

        Several species of small furry animals gathered together grooving with
a Pict should be required headphone listening in History of Music class.
ashke
response 9 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 00:17 UTC 2001

YES!!  Yanno, until I actually saw the album with that song name on it, I
didn't believe it existed...I thought everyone was pulling my leg about it...
eeyore
response 10 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 03:58 UTC 2001

And you even left out a few words from the title.....:)
krj
response 11 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 06:31 UTC 2001

We are *not* helping Colleen out here.
eeyore
response 12 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 13:22 UTC 2001

Maybe not, but at least we are amusing ourselves....:)
cmcgee
response 13 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 14:15 UTC 2001

Amusing me too. :-)

Well, I've started by listening to all the chants and drums I can find: 
Hawaiian, Hindu, and Hildegard von Bingen.  

Two particularly on topic (Western music history) CDs were
Mysteria: Gregorian Chants by Chanticleer
Canticles of Ecstasy, Hildegard von Bingen.  Recorded by Sequentia

Remembering that I'm working with what the A2 library has to offer
(interlibrary loan doesn't work for CDs) and what locals are willing to
lend me,  what else from that time period (or earlier) should I listen
to?
krj
response 14 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 20:28 UTC 2001

For performers, you might look for the women's quartet Anonymous 4,
who are very popular, the library should have something, and the 
Tallis Scholars, though their period might be later.  I need to get 
Leslie to look at this item, she knows lots more about early music
than I do.
tpryan
response 15 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 03:20 UTC 2001

                                        in a cave
arabella
response 16 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 08:08 UTC 2001

The text that all freshman music majors are required to read is
"A History of Western Music," by Donald Grout.  It's considered
kind of a snooze, but should give you an idea of what composers
to listen too.  The library probably has it.  I would lend you my
1970s edition if I had any idea where it was.

Some pre-Bach composers you might try:  Monteverdi (madrigals,
opera, sacred choral music), Palestrina (sacred choral music),
Heinrich Schuetz (usually there's an umlaut over the u, but I
don't know how to do that here, so I stuck in the e), 
Andrea and Giovanni Gabrielli, Tomas Luis de Victoria, Orlando
di Lasso, Thomas Tallis, William Byrd, Orlando Gibbons, Guillaume
Dufay, Machaut.  Those last two guys are Medieval, the prior
ones are mostly Renaissance.  Other Baroque guys to look at besides
Bach: Vivaldi, Arcangelo Corelli, Alessandro Scarlatti (opera),
Domenico Scarlatti (A.S.'s son -- mostly harpsichord music).
There are lots more.  This is off the top of my head, and leans
in the direction of my particular preferences.
arabella
response 17 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 08:10 UTC 2001

This is now linked to the classical conf as #59.

cmcgee
response 18 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 14:20 UTC 2001

Hey, I didn't know there was a classical conf.  I'll go look. Thanks Leslie.
keesan
response 19 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 14:31 UTC 2001

I have 'Music in Europe and the United States, a History'  Edith Borroff,
Eastern Michigan University, 1971, which is aimed at beginners without being
patronizing, and is information and interesting to read.  More stress than
most music history books on Native American and African American music.  The
library book sale had two used copies for $1 each.   Every chapter ends with
a summary of the life and work of some important composers of the period.
An easy way to get an idea of what key works sounded like is to go online and
listen to MIDI files.  Search on MIDI and classical and free.  Some sound like
music boxes but some are quite well done.  If you don't have a sound card,
there is some DOS software that will play the music on your PC speaker (sounds
pretty bad, but it gives you some idea of the music).
gelinas
response 20 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 23:34 UTC 2001

(Some day, I have to find a recording of the Tallis Canon.)
eeyore
response 21 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 18 03:06 UTC 2001

Such a beautiful piece.  I remember playing it for a chamber group a million
years ago.  I think I can still remember the fingerings, even though I haven't
played in about 12 years.
davel
response 22 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 18 12:29 UTC 2001

I'm surprised, Megan.  You don't look a day over a thousand.
8-{)]
keesan
response 23 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 18 14:09 UTC 2001

My PC Speaker software only plays WAV files, not MIDI - sorry.
krj
response 24 of 39: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 21:52 UTC 2001

Todd Mundt had an excellent program yesterday featuring UMich music 
professor Richard Crawford, who has a new book out, AMERICA'S MUSICAL
LIFE.  Nearly 1000 pages, $45, woog.  There are some tempting reviews
at amazon.com.
 
Paraphrasing ruthlessly:  Crawford said that he focused more on performance
than on composition, because until the 20th century, most of the music
performed in America was composed in Europe.  Europe had both a 
patronage music tradition (the great composers) and a free-market 
tradition; there was a problem in translating this to America because
Americans wanted the music from the patronage tradition -- the great 
composers again -- but America lacked the aristocracy and rich 
churches to support it.  So much of Crawford's narrative focuses on 
how people made a living from music at various times.

Crawford talked about the development of music publishing, and how one
person (forgot his name) promoted formal music training as a way to sell
sheet music.  Crawford talked about Duke Ellington at length; he says 
that Ellington's agent steered Ellington and his band into composing more
and more of their own material so that they could keep the publishing 
royalties.  (Most bands at the time played standard songs and had to 
pay royalties to other people.)

There was lots more in the 30 minute segment.  I really want that book
but I should try to be good and wait to see if a paperback comes out.
 0-24   25-39         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss