|
Grex > Oldmusic > #80: Clear Channel taking over the radio world |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
richard
|
|
Clear Channel taking over the radio world
|
Mar 8 06:21 UTC 2002 |
Tell me this isnt scary:
(article reprinted copyright Wall Street Journal):
BY ANNA WILDE MATHEWS
Wall Street Journal
On Feb. 15, disc jockey 'Cabana Boy Geoff' Alan offered a special treat
to listeners of KISS-FM in Boise, Idaho: an interview with pop duo Evan
and Jaron Lowenstein. 'In the studio with Evan and Jaron,' Alan
began. 'How're you guys doing?' The artists reported that they had just
come from skiing at nearby Sun Valley, then praised the local
scene. 'Boise's always a nice place to stop by on the way out,' Evan
Lowenstein said, adding that the city 'is actually far more beautiful
than I expected it to be. It's actually really nice, so happy to be
here.'
Alan chimed in: 'Yeah, we've got some good people here.' Later, he
asked Boise fans to e-mail or call the station with questions for the
performers.
But even the most ardent fan never got through to the brothers that
day. The singers had actually done the interview in San Diego a few
weeks earlier. Alan himself has never been to Boise, though he offers a
flurry of local touches on the show he hosts each weekday from 10 a.m.
to 3 p.m. on the city's leading pop station.
This may be the future of radio. The Boise station's owner, industry
giant Clear Channel Communications Inc., is using technology and its
enormous reach to transform one of the most local forms of media into a
national business. In fact, Boise's KISS 103.3 — its actual call
letters are KSAS-FM — is one of 47 Clear Channel stations using
the 'KISS' name around the country.
It's part of an effort to create a national KISS brand in which
stations share not just logos and promotional bits but also draw from
the same pool of on-air talent. Via a practice called 'voice-tracking,'
Clear Channel pipes popular out-of-town personalities from bigger
markets to smaller ones, customizing their programs to make it sound as
if the DJs are actually local residents.
"We can produce higher-quality programming at a lower cost in markets
where we could never afford the talent," says Randy Michaels, chief
executive of the company's radio unit. "That's a huge benefit to the
audience."
It's also a huge benefit to Clear Channel, which can boast of a
national reach and economies of scale to advertisers and shareholders.
The voice-tracking system allows a smaller station in Boise to
typically pay around $4,000 to $6,000 a year for a weekday on-air
personality, while a local DJ in a market of Boise's size would have to
be paid salary and benefits that might run five times as much.
That's why Clear Channel is developing multiple identities for a
battalion of DJs like Alan, 29, who is based at KHTS-FM in San Diego
but also does "local" shows in Boise; Medford, Ore.; and Santa Barbara,
Calif. Alan does research to offer news items and other details unique
to each city.
DEAL-MAKING FRENZY
The new sound of radio is tied to big changes in the industry brought
on by a 1996 law that got rid of the nationwide ownership cap of 40
stations. The law also allowed companies to own as many as eight
stations in the largest markets, double the previous limit.
The shift sent broadcasters into a frenzy of deal-making, as stations
rapidly changed hands. A fragmented business once made up mainly of mom-
and-pop operators evolved quickly into one dominated by large publicly
traded companies that controlled stations around the country.
No one took advantage of the new law more aggressively, or
successfully, than Clear Channel. The company started out with one FM
station in San Antonio. A relatively little-known firm before 1996, it
rapidly grew into by far the biggest player on the airwaves. Today, it
operates more than 1,200 U.S. stations, compared with 186 stations
owned by its biggest publicly traded rival, Viacom Inc.
Privately held Citadel Communications Corp. has 205 stations, mostly in
midsize markets. Clear Channel has combined its radio clout with a
growing array of other media assets, including the nation's leading
concert-promotion company and a major outdoor-advertising operation.
Now Clear Channel is moving to exploit its size by linking up its
different businesses and wooing major advertisers with the promise that
it can deliver nearly any combination of geography, demographics and
radio format. Part of that effort is the move to create national brands
such as KISS, which can become familiar touchstones for big national
advertisers and, eventually, listeners. While voice-tracking is not a
new practice in radio, Clear Channel is pushing the concept on a far
grander scale than ever, extending well beyond the 47 KISS stations to
encompass most of its empire.
BUCKING TRADITION
Michaels compares his model to McDonald's Corp.'s franchise system. "A
McDonald's manager may get his arms around the local community, but
there are certain elements of the product that are constant," he says.
"You may in some parts of the country get pizza and in some parts of
the country get chicken, but the Big Mac is the Big Mac. How we apply
those principles to radio, we're still figuring out."
Indeed, as Clear Channel has moved to take advantage of its reach, it
has run up against traditional ways of doing things in radio. To create
a national brand based on a federal trademark, for instance, it has had
to mount legal challenges in several markets, chasing off stations that
had been using versions of the KISS name locally. (The U.S. station
that actually has the call letters KISS-FM is an album-rock station
based in Clear Channel's corporate hometown of San Antonio, owned by
rival Cox Radio Inc.) Clear Channel is facing objections from union
locals representing on-air talent, which likely stand to lose jobs as
the company phases in more virtual programming.
The company drew an investigation by the Florida attorney general's
office into whether it was portraying national call-in contests to
listeners as local. Clear Channel admitted no wrongdoing, but in 2000,
it paid the state an $80,000 contribution to the Consumer Frauds Trust
Fund and agreed not to "make any representation or omission that would
cause a reasonable person to believe" that contests involving numerous
stations around the country were actually limited to local listeners.
Michaels argues that much of the static his company hears, particularly
from competitors, is simply a battle against progress. He compares it
with another point in radio's history: when the industry began phasing
out live orchestras and in-studio sound-effects experts in favor of
recorded music.
"The guy making buggy whips and installing horseshoes should have
gotten into making tires," he says. Change, he says, is "inevitable.
All we can do is exploit it."
|
| 76 responses total. |
richard
|
|
response 1 of 76:
|
Mar 8 06:25 UTC 2002 |
sheesh...Pretty soon you wont even know if your local radio is really
local anymore. You hear somebody on the radio discussing the weather
and local issues, and you assume he or she is somewhere around there.
But not anymore. The wave..er radio wave...of the future
|
rcurl
|
|
response 2 of 76:
|
Mar 8 06:42 UTC 2002 |
OK. It's not scary. Now what? Does it matter where entertainment
originates?
|
krj
|
|
response 3 of 76:
|
Mar 8 08:07 UTC 2002 |
I'm starting to regard the 1966 Telecomm Act, with its repeal of the
limits on the number of stations one corporation could own, as the
Destruction of American Musical Culture Act.
|
senna
|
|
response 4 of 76:
|
Mar 8 12:29 UTC 2002 |
If Clear Channel found religion, it would matter to you.
The only station in Ann Arbor they don't own is 1600 AM, and the fact that
it's the only one they don't own is the reason that they don't yet own it.
Get what I'm saying?
|
keesan
|
|
response 5 of 76:
|
Mar 8 15:42 UTC 2002 |
I don't get it, sorry. Do they own 91.8 FM now?
|
other
|
|
response 6 of 76:
|
Mar 8 16:06 UTC 2002 |
There is no radio station broadcasting on 91.8 FM (at least not in Ann
Arbor).
|
mrmat
|
|
response 7 of 76:
|
Mar 8 17:08 UTC 2002 |
I thought I read somewhere (the Ann Arbor News or the Observer) that WAAM,
1600 Am was sold to Clear Channel recently.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 8 of 76:
|
Mar 8 17:09 UTC 2002 |
There are no FM stations broadcasting on *any* even decimal (like .8).
|
keesan
|
|
response 9 of 76:
|
Mar 8 17:38 UTC 2002 |
91.7 broadcasts from near Ann Arbor and considers itself independent.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 10 of 76:
|
Mar 8 18:08 UTC 2002 |
That's a public radio station: Univ. of Mich. (They call themselves
"Michigan Radio", as though there are no other radio stations in Michigan.)
They broadcast mostly NPR material - very litle locally generated
material.
|
senna
|
|
response 11 of 76:
|
Mar 8 23:12 UTC 2002 |
Clear Channel had agreed to buy 1600, but I believe they were caught up in
procedural issues relating to whether or not it would be a good idea for them
to own everything. I apologize for omitting that earlier, but I *did*
actually know it. Honest. :) I'm not sure if it is going to go through or
not.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 12 of 76:
|
Mar 9 01:30 UTC 2002 |
"Drivin' in my car, with the radio on, listenin' to WQIB" (I think it was,
some DC station anyway.) Then, a year or so later, "Drivin in my car, with
the radio on, listenin' to KEARTH101" in California. "Fire", in the late
Seventies. It ain't new.
|
richard
|
|
response 13 of 76:
|
Mar 9 03:31 UTC 2002 |
Clear Channel is also becoming a big player in concert promotion and venue
management. And you can see where that leads. Clear Channel will see to
it that its vast lineup of radio stations work with specific musical acts
they have deals with. The day could be soon coming where no musical act
can get their music played on commercial radio airwaves or tour succesfully
without the Clear Channel "seal of approval" as it were. Which means that
the suits in the Clear Channel offices are probably looking towards the
day when they have substantial influence on popular music and culture in
this country.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 14 of 76:
|
Mar 9 03:44 UTC 2002 |
Can you say "payola"? I _knew_ you could.
|
senna
|
|
response 15 of 76:
|
Mar 9 04:56 UTC 2002 |
Slippery slope arguments never hold much weight with me.
|
keesan
|
|
response 16 of 76:
|
Mar 9 16:50 UTC 2002 |
Is digital radio still under development? Supposedly it would open up a lot
more stations.
|
ea
|
|
response 17 of 76:
|
Mar 9 17:28 UTC 2002 |
Clear Channel owns 107.1 and 102.9 fm, as well as 1050 am, and one
other AM station that I'm not remembering right now. 1050 is a sports
talk station, most of the shows are local people, although they do
pickup some ESPN radio personalities (Tony Kornheiser comes to mind).
107.1 is mostly local people, but they broadcast the Delilah show from
7-midnight weekdays. I have no clue about 102.9. (I know they play
country music, but I don't know if the DJ's are local.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 18 of 76:
|
Mar 9 17:31 UTC 2002 |
Is 106.7 owned by Clear Channel, or is it part of a different national chain?
|
jp2
|
|
response 19 of 76:
|
Mar 9 17:54 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
krj
|
|
response 20 of 76:
|
Mar 9 19:05 UTC 2002 |
Sindi in resp:16 ::
Just this morning I heard my first ad for the XM satellite digital radio
system on WWJ-AM, so I guess they are now looking for customers
in the Detroit area. The ad says they are offering 100 channels, of
which 71 are music channels; it's a subscription service for $10/month
and the radios, which I believe are oriented towards car use, start
at $300. The competing satellite radio system, called Sirius, should
be following imminently. XM and Sirius are both using their
diverse selection of music as a marketing angle -- each is offering
3 or 4 classical channels, for example.
If you want immediate gratification: I listened to about 10 hours of
"digital radio" on various BBC radio channels this week, via
Real Audio and the Internet. However, this requires
a high-speed network connection for decent sound quality -- a 56K
dialup gives a poor-sounding signal which drops out a lot --
and I don't think you can run Real Player on a DOS machine, you'll
need at least Win95.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 21 of 76:
|
Mar 9 19:13 UTC 2002 |
1290am - in the past known as WOIB, WNRS and WIQB-AM.
|
bruin
|
|
response 22 of 76:
|
Mar 9 22:11 UTC 2002 |
AM 1290 is currently WCAS, and has a "nostalgia" fomat.
|
keesan
|
|
response 23 of 76:
|
Mar 9 23:53 UTC 2002 |
Realaudio also requires an extra phone line if you don't have DSL.
We are paying $12/month for the last party line they ever sold in Ann Arbor
(no other party on it) and no tone service. Competitive in price with XM
and you get more than 3 channels. I wonder when someone will come up with
an appliance that is cheaper than a computer to play Realaudio on, which lets
you change the software annually.
We went to the local cable company once and checked out their three classical
stations and they were not worth paying $40/month for (which would include
Cable TV). No commentary, just a randomized selection of what they thought
would appear to the buyer.
Thanks for the info. Not very encouraging - I was hoping for a larger
selection than you can get via analog radio.
|
keesan
|
|
response 24 of 76:
|
Mar 10 00:37 UTC 2002 |
www.xmradio.com. Depends what you count as a classical station. They do have
live performances and commentary and interviews, from NY City. XMRadio
appears to be Japanese. There is one 'classics' station with music from the
last 1000 years (which they define as Renaissance to the present) and a VOX
station with classical vocal music (opera to oratorio, they say), plus
something called Pops (sort of classical) and 'Fine Tuning' - a mixture of
classical, jazz, rock and everything else, an oasis of fine listening. Their
sample program included a lot of modern popular music and Ravel's Bolero as
the non-vocal selection. I count two classical stations here. On the regular
radio I still get three. People with Realaudio can listen to samples of
XMradio offerings. Do you need separate digital receivers for XM and Sirius?
|