|
|
| Author |
Message |
anderyn
|
|
Country Music experiences
|
Mar 11 17:13 UTC 1998 |
In other news, I found a CD yesterday. Now, there's nothing
particularly noteworthy in that, since I find CDs often, but normally
only in the pop/rock/folk/world music sections of the store, although
I have also been observed in new age and soundtracks and have made the
occasional foray into classical. But yesterday I went where no TOP had
gone before, at least not willingly -- into the country
section. Oooogh. Now, before you think I've gone totally mad, there
was a reason. I had been telling Rhiannon over the weekend that the
very first song I remember obsessing over was "The Battle of New
Orleans" by Johnny Horton. And, naturally, I then wanted a copy to
stop the tune from playing in my head. So I checked the CD database at
cdconnection, and discovered that it was collected on a CD of
"Americana", and I ventured into the alien land of country music to
see if I could stand to buy it. And, actually, it has several decent
songs on it, if you like the old west pop/country crossover songs that
date from the late 50's and early 60s (El Paso, Don't Take Your Guns
to Town, North to Alaska, etc.), which Bruce does and I more-or-less
do, since apparently they form part of my primeval soundtrack. I knew
far too many of them for my own peace of mind.
Now, my question is: what makes country music country ? What is the
definition, and why don't I think of those songs named above as
country?
|
| 39 responses total. |
lumen
|
|
response 1 of 39:
|
Mar 12 03:36 UTC 1998 |
aaaaauuuugggggghhhh. I really don't think there are any musicologists or
music historians here on Grex. All I know is that what is generally
considered "country" is actually a convergence of country and western music.
If I remember even vaguely, country was the evolution of pioneer era American
folk, and western was a product of the old cowboy/rancher ballads.
Aficionados of both didn't like the other's music at first: western fans
considered country to be too "folk," and country fans considered western music
to be too campy (think Gene Autry and I think you'll understand).
I'm not sure where hillbilly music fits in exactly-- I think it was part of
the old country genre. Nevertheless, the two styles of music merged together.
I think your confusion results primarily from the fact that country/western
began borrowing from rhythm and blues music after WWII. This happened in the
early 1950's, soon after rhythm and blues was slightly modified and redubbed
rock n' roll. I am not sure if 'rock 'n roll' existed long before
country/western music had an influence. Rock and country/western began
borrowing even more heavily from each other as 'protest folk' arose in the
1960's. There have been other influences in country/western music, including
Bossa Nova (Jimmy Buffet, maybe?), lounge music, pop, acid rock (?) (Junior
Brown), and even stand-up comedy (hey, that's Southern entertainment for you).
I figure this information is really sketchy-- I've seen it represented in an
illustration music educators use as part of a tree.
Now, defining country/western music today is very difficult-- many rock and
country tunes are compositionally the same (as writers will allow their
material to be interpreted in a variety of styles). Sometimes, the only
distinctive characteristics is the Southern twang (real or fake) in the
singer's voice, and the tone color of the music (instruments used,
embellishments employed, combination and number and configuration of
instruments, etc., etc.)
I'm sure the university has TONS of great resource material on the subject--
why not look there? (I can only think of additional resources for rock.)
|
scott
|
|
response 2 of 39:
|
Mar 12 12:06 UTC 1998 |
"Country" is currently corporate product. I do like old Eddy Arnold, though.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 3 of 39:
|
Mar 12 17:26 UTC 1998 |
There's nothing unique to "country" about being mostly "corporate product."
Most other music that enjoys widespread popularity suffers from the same
affliction.
I'd agree though, that the majority of country music recorded today,
including almost all of the big acts, is way too processed and formulaic
for my tastes. That doesn't mean there isn't a lot of great music to
be found in the nooks and crannies of the genre, it just gets edged out
by the money acts the same as everywhere else..
|
krj
|
|
response 4 of 39:
|
Mar 13 05:19 UTC 1998 |
I'm sorry, I'm terrible with definitions. Country music is what
gets filed in the country bins.
If one formed an impression of jazz based on what gets played on
"smooth jazz" radio stations, one might conclude that jazz, too,
is all corporate product. But "corporate product" is all most
listeners are going to encounter in any style unless they get down
and root around under some rocks.
I can't think of any particular reason to file "Battle of New Orleans"
as a country song; I think of it as a pop song from when I was young.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 5 of 39:
|
Mar 13 22:26 UTC 1998 |
I'm always surprised to see Bonnie Raitt, whom I always thought of as a blues
singer, filed under country.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 6 of 39:
|
Mar 15 05:51 UTC 1998 |
So did anyone go see the Waco Brothers show at the Magic Stick tonight?
I was greatly bummed to find out about it only this evening, after it
was too late for me to attend.. If you did go, please enter a response
in the concert review album..
|
krj
|
|
response 7 of 39:
|
Mar 23 22:01 UTC 1998 |
I guess no one went from Grex. Does the current activity level of
the Waco Brothers -- they seem to be putting out an album every 9
months or so -- mean that the Mekons are finished? I notice that
the lead Waco, Jon Langford, has a solo disc out.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 8 of 39:
|
Mar 24 03:08 UTC 1998 |
Yes, Skull Orchard or something like that.
I get the feeling that the Mekons are an on-again, off-again thing and
that they're "off" for the time being. Given the quality of their last
few releases maybe that's not such a bad thing, either. I'd just as
soon they laid low for a while and got together again when they were
ready to release an album or two of the quality level they hit with
"Rock 'n' Roll" and "The Curse of the Mekons"
Jon Langford isn't the only Mekon with a recent solo project -- seems
like many of them (Langford, Sally Timms, Rico Bell, Waco Brothers, and
others..) have been doing mostly non-Mekon work lately..
|
tpryan
|
|
response 9 of 39:
|
Mar 30 03:46 UTC 1998 |
I you put on a plaid shirt and sing with just your guitar,
I think you're folk. Add a bass, a slide guitar, possibly a drummer,
and add a cowhide jacket, with fringes, and sparkly things, and put
on a cowboy hat, you're country.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 10 of 39:
|
Mar 30 04:07 UTC 1998 |
But if you want to get played on country radio you have to affect a
twang whether you're from a region where you might naturally have
acquired one or not..
|
lumen
|
|
response 11 of 39:
|
Apr 1 01:59 UTC 1998 |
that's the sh**iest thing I ever heard and is one of the biggest reasons why
I can't stand music labeled 'country'-- all those annoying accents, especially
on those who are faking it!
|
mcnally
|
|
response 12 of 39:
|
Apr 1 03:27 UTC 1998 |
To be fair, once again country music isn't the only genre where the
popular media outlets are more concerned with image than with musical
performance (how many female "adult contemporary" singers can you
think of who are ugly or fat?) but given some of the traditional
themes of country music it may be guilty of the greatest hypocrisy..
Although it's natural to try and judge genres to which you do not
normally listen by the output of the most prominent stars, consider
your own favorite category of music and imagine what it'd be like if
the biggest-selling performers were the only ones you got to hear.
Pretty dreadful picture, isn't it?
That said, I find I like traditional country music a lot more than I
like the direction in which most performers in the genre are currently
headed.. I think current country music is being destroyed by its own
success.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 13 of 39:
|
Apr 5 01:15 UTC 1998 |
Well, my problem is that I don't like traditional country (well, at least
not the stuff I grew up listening to, though I will endure bluegrass),
and I don't particularly like modern country, either. I was really
surprised to find that I liked the songs on the album I bought, because I
wouldn't have thought I would...
|
mziemba
|
|
response 14 of 39:
|
Jun 6 13:41 UTC 1998 |
What makes country music "country music"? Well, historically it has roots
in both European and African musical traditions.
The primary European influence is Celtic music, which contributed an emphasis
on ballads and fiddling.
Recently, it's been argued somewhat convincingly that the banjo was
derived from the African kora, likely carried over in the slave trade.
Both instruments are stringed instruments with a resonating chamber
covered with some sort of membrane. It also seems that there are some
similar musical patterns.
Undoubtedly, as settlers moved west, taking their folk music with them,
certain strains began to emerge that focused on western frontier themes
like ranching and cowboys. This probably lent itself to more individual
performances, later incorporated into the idea of fronting a band with a
primary singer/performer.
Nashville established itself as a musical hub for country by the 1930s via
radio broadcasts from the Grand Ole Opry, which, interestingly, refused to
accept drums for a long time after.
This, however, didn't stop the influence of blues, and later, rock 'n'
roll.
The roots of country music form the basis for what we recognize as
country music today: an emphasis on stringed intruments like the fiddle,
guitar, and banjo and a concern with rural themes and frontier life.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 15 of 39:
|
Jun 9 01:49 UTC 1998 |
Well, see, the really weird thing is that I *like* fiddle music, and guitaur,
and I'll even accept banjo, but I just don't like the "twang" in what I
call country music.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 16 of 39:
|
Jun 9 02:56 UTC 1998 |
Do you mean the "twang" in the music or the "twang" in the vocals?
If the latter, I agree -- I get pretty put-out by the vocal affectations
of some country musicians, especially if I later hear them talk and it's
apparent that the way they sing is not anything like the way they talk..
|
anderyn
|
|
response 17 of 39:
|
Jun 9 13:53 UTC 1998 |
Mostly in the vocals. But there's
also a certain flavour in the music
that I just don't like, but it's hard
to describe. Um. And it's even
more apparent to me in vocals
when it is by someone who's
NOT putting it on ....
|
lumen
|
|
response 18 of 39:
|
Jun 9 22:19 UTC 1998 |
I'm not fond of the electric slide, especially in country music. It was first
developed in the contemporary music of Hawaii after WWII, I believe. Electric
slide in modern Hawaiian music is okay, I guess, but it's begun to become
cheezy.
Modern country is really bubblegummy, which makes me especially nauseous.
The old notion that country songs are often laments of life's disappointments
don't seem to be true anymore.
One of my biggest complaints is that I can't seem to relate to the music--
that is, not just the lyrics, but the whole lifestyle around it. Next one
is all those suburban and urban 'cowboys' who claim to be country but have
never farmed or ranched in their life. Poseurs.
I guess I just relate more to sex, drugs, and rock n' roll (and everything
before and after that).
|
mcnally
|
|
response 19 of 39:
|
Jun 10 07:14 UTC 1998 |
All valid complaints, and things that bug me about modern country music,
too, especially your point about the lifestyle package that's sold along
with the music -- it doesn't have much to do with the way I see myself nor
does it hold much appeal for me.
|
mziemba
|
|
response 20 of 39:
|
Jun 11 12:22 UTC 1998 |
Country's just been musically inbred for a while -- modern commercialization
has just forced stagnation. It's beginning to change a little, however. I
see more country artists beginning to borrow from outside their immediate
musical heritage, going farther back to blues, bluegrass, and folk.
In fairness, other popular music styles haven't been immune to this syndrome.
As much nostalgia as I hold for the 80s, I don't think it was an exceptionally
experimental time. I see much more growth, now.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 21 of 39:
|
Jul 26 21:53 UTC 1998 |
There is still a lot of separation between singer and songwriter
in country music. We have seen more and more songwriters that are the
performer, but we still see a lot of artists that have the Nashville
powers-that-be find songs for them. I think this path has reduced
creativity in country music, as the powers-that-be *know* what a hit
should read like in the lyrics and sound like in the music.
<tpryan reads music.cf first time since June or so>
|
lumen
|
|
response 22 of 39:
|
Aug 2 08:51 UTC 1998 |
Oh, that's how country has found so much fame these days! Must make marketing
a hell of a lot easier-- just get a pretty face and a golden voice, and don't
worry about whether a person that possesses those can write or not.
Of course, country's been selling out, too.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 23 of 39:
|
Aug 3 16:36 UTC 1998 |
That's not really a "these days" phenomenon, as Tim hints in #21.
That's been a part of the country music industry for a *long* time.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 24 of 39:
|
Aug 4 03:19 UTC 1998 |
Actually with more country artists than Nashville can hold,
Country is finding more popularity, partly because there is more
to choose from.
|