|
|
| Author |
Message |
md
|
|
The Mahler Item
|
Jan 25 14:47 UTC 1994 |
This is an item to talk about Gustav Mahler and his music.
Do you know any of his music? Do you like it? Hate it?
Care about it at all? What specifically about his music do
like or not like?
|
| 40 responses total. |
md
|
|
response 1 of 40:
|
Jan 25 14:57 UTC 1994 |
I've heard parts or all of all of his symphonies at one time
or another, along with his song cycles. The only live performance
of his music I can remember hearing was Bernstein conducting
the 9th symphony many years ago in Springfield, Massachusetts.
After much applause, he came out and conducted a suite from
"Carmen" as an encore, which is something he liked to do when
he took the NY Phil out to the provinces. I will never forget
the feeling of elation I experienced when the first brilliant
notes of the Bizet burst out, after the interminable boredom
of the Mahler symphony.
I only have three Mahler recordings: the 5th, 6th and 8th
symphonies. Also, I have the score of the 5th and have followed
it through a couple of times. I sense a lot of depth in Mahler.
His music wasn't dashed off between conducting jobs, it's the
product of deep meditation and tremendous labor. But for some
reason, it doesn't hold my attention or offer anything that
makes me want to listen to except out of sheer duty.
|
vidar
|
|
response 2 of 40:
|
Jan 25 17:33 UTC 1994 |
I don't know anything about it. Therefore I have no opinion on the issue.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 3 of 40:
|
Jan 28 16:49 UTC 1994 |
Ah, Mahler. For all the enthusiasm with which I've touted Mahler's
Ninth you'd probably think I know his entire canon, but I don't.
I've heard bits of most on the radio, own two CDs, and have never
heard a live performance. From what I've read of the man he
tended to write music that mirrored whatever was happening with
his life at the moment. Most composers probably do this to some
extent but with Mahler it was almost a diary. He was always seeking
answers to unanswerable questions; he was obsessive and neurotic
at a time when being obsessive and neurotic wasn't fashionable.
The two symphonies I have on CD, the Fifth and the Ninth, are quite
different in tone. The Fifth to me is something akin to the teenager
who doesn't have time to ponder life's mistakes as there is simply
to much to experience. The Ninth is the old man trying to come
to terms with not having enough time to make make sense of the mistakes
and use of his experience.
The Ninth is simply the most profound symphony I've ever heard.
Someone once described the ending as the closest music has ever
been to silence. It is peace.
One of these days I really should get over to the library and
check out some of his other symphonies and give them a fair audience.
This item might just be the needed push.
|
md
|
|
response 4 of 40:
|
Jan 28 18:52 UTC 1994 |
Mahler's 8th is the one they call the "Symphony of a Thousand,"
because of the forces required to perform it. This is the one
that requires 800 singers and 200 musicians, plus an apocalyptic
pipe organ. It's the one Mahler symphony I have a soft spot for
(although I don't think I've listend to it in at least a decade),
simply because it's so huge and helpless. Also, I miight actually
go out and buy a recording of his 1st symphony because the scherzo
is so jolly - a big friendly laendler that takes your hand and
drags you out onto the dance floor before you've had a chance
to empty your stein of beer. (The critics never fail to mention
that the slow movement of the 1st symphony is nothing more than
"Frere Jacques" in a minor key. That doesn't even bother *me*,
Mary, so I don't see why it would bother you.)
|
chelsea
|
|
response 5 of 40:
|
Jan 28 21:43 UTC 1994 |
Actually, I hold a fondness for Frere Jacques as it was the first
tune I learned on the cello. And if it wasn't for that piece I
wouldn't know any French at all.
Mahler's 8th would probably play much better in performance
than on a recording. Something as bombastic as that piece
needs others senses to lend it authenticity. Pay your fifty
bucks, spend 2 hours watching a conductor try to keep that
mob together, feel the vibration, lose control of the volume,
and get caught up in the audience's appreciation.
Then you go to an afterglow with the Baquettes where you sip
some frothy coffee beverage and all discuss how that babe of
a concertmaster nearly fell out of her strapless dress during
the final movement. Now that's Mahler's Eight. ;-)
And yes, I would like to hear more about the Baquettes and
the Gildersteins. Please.
|
kenman
|
|
response 6 of 40:
|
Jan 31 22:34 UTC 1994 |
Who?
|
bartlett
|
|
response 7 of 40:
|
Feb 4 20:22 UTC 1994 |
Re Maler's 1st, I have a real soft spot for this one, and don't ask me why,
because it's sure not high-brow stuff, but black bread and potatoes music.
The third movement (the aforementioned slow movement) is certainly more than
a setting of Frere Jacques in d-minor, among other things it turns into a
klezmer fest at several points.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 8 of 40:
|
Feb 24 01:03 UTC 1994 |
I've been following a discussion on Prodigy regarding Mahler's
unfinished 10th Symphony. So just this evening I purchased
the Simon Rattle CD, following the second edition of Deryck
Cooke's interpretation of Mahler's manuscript. It will probably
be this weekend before I get the chance to hear it straight though
but I sure am looking forward to it. I've never heard the Tenth.
|
md
|
|
response 9 of 40:
|
Feb 24 13:55 UTC 1994 |
Hope you enjoy it. I was thinking of you yesterday as I was
listening to Nielsen's 5th Symphony. Are you familiar with
any of Carl Nielsen's music? The 5th Symphony sounds like
something a Mahler fan might enjoy, especially the second
(and final) movement. It has lots of characteristically
Nielsenoid stuff in it, and one passage that might almost be
a deliberate parody of Brahms, but the middle and later
sections sound Mahlerian to me.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 10 of 40:
|
Feb 26 00:40 UTC 1994 |
Was it this item where the Kronos Quartet had been mentioned?
Good. So I'll remind everyone that they'll be in concert,
at The Power Center in Ann Arbor, on March 12. Tickets are
$26 and down and available through the University Musical Society
box office in Burton Tower.
I've not heard anything by Carl Neilson, Michael. At least not
that I know of. But my favorite recording label, BIS, has done
at least one CD of his work I believe. I remember wondering what
it was all about and wishing record stores still offered little
rooms where one could play a record (CD on headphones, nowadays)
and have the opportunity to hear the selection before whipping out
the cold cash (plastic, ditto).
|
md
|
|
response 11 of 40:
|
Apr 7 21:16 UTC 1994 |
The current BBC Music magazine has a nice article comparing various
performances of Mahler's 9th symphony. The reviewer picks Claudio
Abbado as the best, and the Mahler Youth Orchestra as the second
best. Have you heard either of them, chelsea?
|
chelsea
|
|
response 12 of 40:
|
Apr 10 11:56 UTC 1994 |
The recording I'm so fond of is a concert recording of Karajan
conducting the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, (DD), sometime early
80's. I've heard other performances but at this point they just
sound a little "off". I have been imprinted by Karajan's version.
Did the article you refer to make mention of this recording?
I don't know if you read Usenet news, Michael, but I think of you
often while reading some of the comments there. Lucid, informed,
opinionated, and often both fascinating and useful. In fact, there
is an item up for discussion right now - "Why do people like Mahler".
Check it out.
|
md
|
|
response 13 of 40:
|
Apr 11 13:46 UTC 1994 |
I don't recall what the reviewer had to say about Karajan.
Karajan seems to be sliding out of fashion lately, which I
guess is what you expect after a conductor dies. I've always
preferred Karajan's recordings of Beethoven, Brahms and
Sibelius to any others. Especially Brahms -- I was brought up
on Toscanini, and I'll never forget the forst time I heard
a Karajan performance of Brahms's 1st symphony. "first"
I wouldn't know how to read Usenet news if my life depended on it.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 14 of 40:
|
Apr 11 14:06 UTC 1994 |
Type rn at a shell prompt - and wait...and wait...and wait...
|
md
|
|
response 15 of 40:
|
Apr 11 14:39 UTC 1994 |
What's a shell prompt? Like, a picture of a seashell or something?
|
chelsea
|
|
response 16 of 40:
|
Apr 11 22:12 UTC 1994 |
And this from a man with a slave geek. Some master you are.
|
omni
|
|
response 17 of 40:
|
Apr 12 02:18 UTC 1994 |
A shell prompt is something like grex% (for csh) or $ (for tcsh) or
anything other than the OK: prompt. You might want to put a ! bang
before the rn thus !rn so it will run the news program.
Herbert Von Karijan is a fine conducter, and I don't know a lot
about classical. I only know what I like, it it is him.
|
arabella
|
|
response 18 of 40:
|
Feb 24 22:54 UTC 1995 |
I have had mixed feelings about Mahler. I studied him in both
my 19th and 20th century music classes. I listened to a bunch of
recordings back in 1987 and 88, and then thought little more of Mahler.
Then I joined the Choral Union this past August. One of our projects
this year was to collaborate with the DSO in performances of
Mahler's 2nd Symphony ("Resurrection"). When we first began
rehearsals in January, I didn't
much care for our part in the festivities. The choir sits still
through about 70 minutes of orchestral music, then gets to sing
for a mere 7 minutes. Not much return for a lot of preparation,
I thought. But last weekend we had our three performances, and
my opinion was forever altered. Sitting on stage throughout the
entire work, though difficult (physically, since the choir
risers are pretty uncomfortable), gave me a real appreciation for this
work. And the choir's seven minutes turned out to be pretty darn
wonderful. Also, Florence Quivar singing the mezzo solos was just
incredible. The audiences were very appreciative, and John
Guinn (famously curmudgeonly Free Press critic) even gave out concert
four stars.
|
md
|
|
response 19 of 40:
|
Feb 25 13:58 UTC 1995 |
ENVY! You must be walking two feet off the ground after
that experience.
|
arabella
|
|
response 20 of 40:
|
Feb 26 09:16 UTC 1995 |
Actually, I came down with a cold in the middle of the concert run,
so I've spent the week since our last performance hacking and
wheezing with bronchitis, so no cloud nine for me this time around.
|
md
|
|
response 21 of 40:
|
Mar 5 19:23 UTC 1995 |
The current BBC Music magazine has a cover story about
Pierre Boulez turning seventy this year (which I find
pretty alarming). Turns out Boulez has a contract to
record Mahler's 6th, 7th and 9th symphonies. People who
have heard him conduct the 7th are making some extreme
claims - all that bathos and schmaltz in Mahler is put
there by well-meaning conductors, not by Gustav Mahler.
We'll see. If anyone can turn on to Mahler, it's Pierre
Boulez. The very fact that he's conducting Mahler already
makes me want to go out and fill in my Mahler symphonies
on CD, starting with 6, 7 and 9. If I still don't like
Mahler after listening to the new Boulez recordings when
they come out, I'll just give up.
[In the BBC Music interview, Boulez has some tart comments
about Gorecki's 3rd. If he's capable of that, says Boulez,
his commitment to modernism was neither effective nor sincere.
"But look," he adds, "I understand Gorecki made enough money
on the Third to buy a new Mercedes. So at least he got a
nice new car out of it."]
|
srw
|
|
response 22 of 40:
|
Mar 28 07:02 UTC 1995 |
Mahler's second is my favorite Mahler symphony.
I had the pleasure of listening to a performance live at Orchestra Hall
in Boston, with Seiji Ozawa conducting the BSO. ( back in 1986 )
I like the dance movement in this one better than the much more popular
one in #1. The chorus at the end always wipes me out.
Mahler's eighth:
This is the one I have never been able to appreciate. I like all the others,
though, except I have little familiarity with #1
Mahler's first:
My favorite movement from the first (Titan) symphony is neither
the Laendler nor the Frere Jacques movement, but rather the final one.
I am fond of the stark contrasts between the stormy and melodic parts,
and I am especially fond of the melodies. The first bar of this
movement (3 notes) sets the excitement level to the max.
Mahler's fifth:
Has any Mahler fan but me noticed the prominent appearance of the beginning
of this symphony in a MASH TV episode? Of course it is used as an icon
of boring classical music. It's a funeral march, for heaven's sake!
Beethoven wasn't treated so badly. At first this merely offended me,
but eventually I came to see Winchester in a new light.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 23 of 40:
|
Mar 28 15:05 UTC 1995 |
And the ninth? What of the ninth? (I guess you can spot my
favorite.)
|
srw
|
|
response 24 of 40:
|
Mar 29 21:14 UTC 1995 |
It's not one of mine. I guess I need to listen to it more.]
|