|
|
| Author |
Message |
peacefrg
|
|
Netscape 1.1
|
May 5 13:39 UTC 1995 |
I just got Netscape 1.1 and was wondering if anybody else has it yet?
I'm running it on a 386, 4 meg ram, 14.4 baud and have a few questions.
Does it usually take 5-10 minutes to boot after clicking on it? (no
exageration) Does it usually crash every 5 minutes or every time you try a
link?
I want to use this program but It's not impressing me so far. Plus,
when I look at my homepage I don't get graphics. But other people do.
|
| 36 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
May 5 16:31 UTC 1995 |
I'm running it. Comes up in a few seconds. But I'm running on a Pentium
90, not a 386. That could explain the difference.
It hasn't crashed that I can recall. I do experience an occasional
problem with screen painting in the Windows version: When I scroll to
a new page using the scroll bar, sometimes the screen will only be
partially updated -- large blank areas, some lines of text having only
the top or bottom portion printed. Selecting "refresh" from the menu
always corrects the problem.
Also, the PageUp and PageDown keys don't work for me in the Windows
version.
I also run the Linux/X version of Netscape 1.1. This works fine for me
and doesn't have any of the above-mentioned problems.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
May 5 19:40 UTC 1995 |
I use it. On this Mac IIci, it opens completely in 20 seconds. Never
crashes. Get a Mac :).
|
scg
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
May 6 05:43 UTC 1995 |
I just timed the Linux/X version of Netscape 1.1N loading in about
seven seconds, on my 486DX2-66. My experience with Windoze has generally
been that it's pretty slow, and 386s are slow, so I'm not surprized it
took you a while. As for the crashes, the beta versions of Netscape 1.1
crashed sometimes, but not nearly as often as you described (maybe once an
hour or so). I haven't had enough experience with the release version yet
to make any statements like that about it yet.
You problem with it not loading images is probably a problem with
how you have it configured. Go to your Options menu and click on "Auto
Load Images." That should fix it.
|
curby
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
May 6 08:49 UTC 1995 |
Rane: Don't you go and start any religous wars now, ya here!
[Get a PowerPC running BSDI! <grin>]
|
peacefrg
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
May 6 15:11 UTC 1995 |
So where do I get the release version?
|
kenb
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
May 6 20:42 UTC 1995 |
ftp.mcom.com
|
peacefrg
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
May 7 05:10 UTC 1995 |
How do I know if I have the realease version already?
Could the crashing be caused from memory problems?
|
remmers
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
May 7 22:53 UTC 1995 |
If you select "About" in the "Help" pulldown menu, it should tell you
which version you have.
|
mwarner
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Jul 10 13:08 UTC 1995 |
I'd like to use Netscape as a browser on my computer to read an html index
for images stored on my hard drive. My problem is that I'm using a Mac,
and realize that I don't know what a complete file name is & so have no
idea what to refer to in the links to the images. Same for creating the
index file, although you can "click" open a text file. Can anyone provide
me with an example or brief explanation?
|
srw
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Jul 15 02:47 UTC 1995 |
I haven't use Netscape in "local" mode, but it should handle URLs like
file:index.html
This presupposes that it is already pointing to that directory.
You can traverse directories downward using : instead of / in mac programs
that can handle full path names (very few), but I dunno what Netscape will
want to see. Your links should be relative rather than absolute, if you have
a choice. (I hope *some* of what I said made sense.)
|
mwarner
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Jul 15 19:40 UTC 1995 |
Yes. I rediscovered relative links in that if I have the Index file in a
given folder, it will read any links within that folder without concern
about the full file name. I found that Netscape reads macOS-resident file
addresses in unixese (with / forward slashes) instead of the system ":".
I also learned that items on the Hard Drive are located on "Hard Drive"
(Doooh!) So a system file name should look something like: Hard
Drive:Folder Name:file (or Desk Top or exactly whatever the icon/location
is labeled) and substitute to Hard Drive/Folder Name/file as a HTTP
location. You can set up Netscape to consider any file as home, but I
interrupt the dialing(leaving the Netscape homepage default) and manually
load my index page when the program comes up. ../ indicates one level up,
but I haven't progressed to the point of needing multiple levels of
folders.
I'm able to make a working href to display a pict file image, but so
far cannot get an in-page image to work. I've gotten as far as loading
the file, but only get a "broken picture" display. Still, I'm looking
forward to getting a large plunder-of-research assortment of documents and
images organized and accessible once I see the light over a few more
details.
|
srw
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Jul 15 21:56 UTC 1995 |
You seem to have a pretty good handle on things now.
Good luck!
|
rcurl
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Dec 20 08:00 UTC 1995 |
I loaded Netscape 2.0b3 on my office IIci OK - having enough HD space,
but I didn't have enough space on my Powerbook HD for 2.0b3, so I
only "upgraded" to 1.12 from 1.10N. Now the questions is - what is
in that additional 1MB required for 12.0b3 over 1.12, and why do I
need it?
|
n8nxf
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Dec 20 13:25 UTC 1995 |
What I want to know is where do I get a copy of MacTCP? Seems I have
to buy some book from my favorite book store to get it. That seems
really weird to me. Also, are there versions of MacTCP to avoid?
Doesn't the latest version of Netscape support Java? Perhaps that's
why it wants more memory.
|
remmers
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Dec 20 14:31 UTC 1995 |
Yep, it supports Java, which could explain the extra memory
requirements. Mail and news support is much fancier too. Netscape
2.0 supports the POP mail protocol, which means you can use it to
receive mail as well as send it out. I don't think earlier versions
of Netscape supported POP.
Netscape seems bent on dominating the internet client market
by making its web browser the Swiss Army Knife of the internet:
At this point it can do http, ftp, gopher, smtp, pop, nntp, java,
and maybe even irc. Plans are underway to support Adobe Acrobat
as well, although I'm not sure that's implemented yet. Anyway,
no wonder it's a big program.
The current Newsweek has a special section on the Internet,
including a big spread on the Netscape success story and the
people behind it.
|
srw
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Dec 21 06:27 UTC 1995 |
I believe that the latest Mac version of the Beta is still lacking in Java
support. That would be 2.0B3. I am waiting to hear of the first Mac version
that supprts Java. John is right about the Windows beta, though.
Also all those other features are supposed to be there, too.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Dec 21 07:32 UTC 1995 |
Say ., the latest version of MacTCP is 2.0.6 (I think). After your
inquiry I went hunting for it in archives, but it isn't to be found.
That is weird. Must be a money maker for Apple. Hmmm...I wonder if
MacTCP is bundled with the systems you can download from ftp.apple.com.
Netscape 2.0b3 is already 2.7MB - even without Java, then. This is
getting ridiculous...
|
srw
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Dec 22 05:51 UTC 1995 |
MacTCP is bundled with commercial internet apps, with Adam Engst's book,
with a recent release of the OS (7.5 I think, but I don't have it, so I'm
not sure), and with certain other networking products, like pathworks.
Not likely to find it via ftp, though.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 19 of 36:
|
Feb 5 18:31 UTC 1998 |
Let's recycle this time....
I ran into a puzzle on Netscape Gold 3.0 (for Mac). A small group of
folder bookmarks in the Bookmark menu suddently acquired strange symbols
just to the left, and the contents of the folders did not open. I fooled
around in the bookmarks window for a bit, and found that by moving one
of the culprits in the list, the group of affected folders changed. The
first one in the group seemed to matter the most. I moved it out of the
group and renamed it...and the problem vanished, even after moving it back
into the original place in the list. What was going on?
|
srw
|
|
response 20 of 36:
|
Mar 23 02:54 UTC 1998 |
evidently no one has a clue. I sure don't.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 21 of 36:
|
Mar 23 06:05 UTC 1998 |
Are you still using Macs? We may be two of the last....
|
srw
|
|
response 22 of 36:
|
Mar 23 19:20 UTC 1998 |
I do use a Mac for my personal stuff. I have been forced to switch to
Windows NT for my work-related stuff.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 23 of 36:
|
Mar 24 07:11 UTC 1998 |
I think it is still a billion dollar business....and yet its products
are becoming almost unnoticeable in the multi-billion dollar PC business.
It is quite an amazing phenomenon.
|
gibson
|
|
response 24 of 36:
|
Mar 24 20:47 UTC 1998 |
Rane, in reading the old confs i saw you were looking for data logging
for a Mac. I happened across 1 yesterday. If your still looking, let me know.
They were offering a beta for free use. (if offer is still good)
|