|
|
| Author |
Message |
i
|
|
Grex Problems Item
|
Mar 23 04:01 UTC 2003 |
This item is for system problems. If something on Grex isn't working
right (line noise on a modem, weird behavior from a program, etc.),
this is the place to announce it. Except for security holes. If you
find a hole in system security, mail information about it to "staff".
|
| 224 responses total. |
richard
|
|
response 1 of 224:
|
Mar 28 07:32 UTC 2003 |
couldn't get to grex OR mnet all evening. Very odd for both to be down at
the same time.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 2 of 224:
|
Mar 28 12:09 UTC 2003 |
It's a massive DoS experience.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 3 of 224:
|
Mar 28 13:54 UTC 2003 |
I tried to telnet in Wednesday night: No 311 in queue. Is that common at
9 pm?
|
naftee
|
|
response 4 of 224:
|
Mar 28 14:33 UTC 2003 |
MADE_ON!grxup.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 5 of 224:
|
Mar 28 16:17 UTC 2003 |
After Grex came back on line last night, could not delete read mail
in pine for a while - that feature became active again later in my
connection.
|
tod
|
|
response 6 of 224:
|
Mar 28 17:20 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
iggy
|
|
response 7 of 224:
|
Mar 28 18:04 UTC 2003 |
you must be popular!
|
hash
|
|
response 8 of 224:
|
Mar 28 19:57 UTC 2003 |
someone from denver on speakeasy.
I'd ask jeanne.
|
polygon
|
|
response 9 of 224:
|
Mar 30 16:26 UTC 2003 |
Telnetting to cyberspace.org fails due to some kind of DNS problem.
Telnetting to grex.org works.
|
krokus
|
|
response 10 of 224:
|
Apr 2 22:33 UTC 2003 |
When I tried to connect with PuTTY earlier, I got this:
Server refused to allocate pty
Warning: no access to tty; thus no job control in this shell...
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
stty: TCGETS: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
TERM: Undefined variable.
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
I edited for formatting, as there were only line feeds, no carrige
returns in the lines.
|
carson
|
|
response 11 of 224:
|
Apr 2 22:54 UTC 2003 |
(ssh connections don't drop into the telnet queue. you likely experienced
the condition of connecting via ssh without an available tty. it's more
common if you try to connect via ssh during "busy" periods.)
|
tod
|
|
response 12 of 224:
|
Apr 2 23:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mvpel
|
|
response 13 of 224:
|
Apr 3 01:34 UTC 2003 |
Speaking of sshd, it's still an antique version 1.
|
goose
|
|
response 14 of 224:
|
Apr 3 03:13 UTC 2003 |
yeah, any chance of updating it? My client keeps complaining.
|
tod
|
|
response 15 of 224:
|
Apr 3 14:33 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 16 of 224:
|
Apr 3 16:58 UTC 2003 |
Why bother? Aren't we 100 days away from new Grex machine?
|
gull
|
|
response 17 of 224:
|
Apr 3 17:16 UTC 2003 |
Considering that yet another security hole was just discovered in the
version of sendmail we're running, any security problems in ssh are
probably moot.
|
keesan
|
|
response 18 of 224:
|
Apr 3 18:15 UTC 2003 |
I don't think the new grex machine is going to be ready at any predictable
time, any more than the old one was.
|
dpc
|
|
response 19 of 224:
|
Apr 9 13:56 UTC 2003 |
I'm having a mysterious problem with e-mail. I type "!mail"
to send mail. I use Mail version 5.5 6/1/90, or so the system
tells me.
Over the past month or so, I occasionally get a
block of random characters instead of the body of a message.
These e-mails are *not* failed attachments. Instead, I
am receiving a screen or two of junk. This happens with
respected e-mail senders like aol and umich.edu. And
it only happens occasionally.
Is this a Grex problem?
|
remmers
|
|
response 20 of 224:
|
Apr 9 18:25 UTC 2003 |
Hard to tell without further info. Have you saved any of these messages?
|
davel
|
|
response 21 of 224:
|
Apr 9 23:30 UTC 2003 |
Possibly they contain 8-bit characters which set your screen to an
alternate-character-set mode? I've seen this happen with vt100 emulation in
Procomm. But I don't know that they would set it back, so that probably isn't
it.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 22 of 224:
|
Apr 9 23:41 UTC 2003 |
Is the behavior reproducable? (sp?)
That is, does it happen consistently every time you display a certain
message or is unpredictable?
|
gull
|
|
response 23 of 224:
|
Apr 10 14:26 UTC 2003 |
There are a lot of viruses currently going around that look like garbage
because they use incorrectly formatted attachments that are meant to
automatically open in buggy versions of Outlook. Some of them forge
'from' addresses from address books, so they might appear to come from a
legitimate source. I get a couple of these a day.
|
other
|
|
response 24 of 224:
|
Apr 10 14:29 UTC 2003 |
I thought those were all Klez variations.
|