|
|
| Author |
Message |
aruba
|
|
DISA course on Systems Security
| 
May 16 18:47 UTC 2003 |
Donated by Todd Plesco (tod):
In excellent condition, sealed, web-based training CD:
"System Administrator Incident Preparation & Response for UNIX (SAIPR UNIX)"
This course provides training in preparing for and responding to information
systems security incidents from a generic law enforcement perspective. It
is designed for individuals with three to five years of experience as
Systems Administrators (SAs) or Information Systems Security Officers
(ISSOs). This CD was developed by the Defense Information Systems Agency
(DISA). Note: This course uses Flash5 software so make sure you can use a
Flash5 plugin with your browser.
Minimum bid: $5
|
| 63 responses total. |
polytarp
|
|
response 1 of 63:
|
May 17 17:45 UTC 2003 |
$5
|
jegazlay
|
|
response 2 of 63:
|
May 21 20:19 UTC 2003 |
$12.00
|
polytarp
|
|
response 3 of 63:
|
May 22 11:20 UTC 2003 |
$12.01
|
polytarp
|
|
response 4 of 63:
|
May 22 19:12 UTC 2003 |
WHAT ABOUT THIS ITEM, ARUBA?~?!?
|
aruba
|
|
response 5 of 63:
|
May 23 03:46 UTC 2003 |
What about it?
|
fuzzball
|
|
response 6 of 63:
|
May 23 05:22 UTC 2003 |
Does anyone else notice the lack of responce items numbers 1,3,4 ?? whats up?
is that not odd to anyone else but me?
-Chad C. www.ezfuzz.net
|
gelinas
|
|
response 7 of 63:
|
May 23 11:06 UTC 2003 |
Item 1 is frozen, so it won't get responses. I don't know why there are so
few bids on the envelopes and concert.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 8 of 63:
|
May 23 11:15 UTC 2003 |
fuzzball is unbelievably stupid; apparently, he ignored me and then FORGOT
about it, and is now CONFUSED!
|
fuzzball
|
|
response 9 of 63:
|
May 23 16:48 UTC 2003 |
No No No
i ment here in this item....
look above.... responces numbers 1,3,4 are gone...... weird....
<i am talking about the responces on this item>
-Chad C. www.ezfuzz.net
|
jep
|
|
response 10 of 63:
|
May 23 17:12 UTC 2003 |
I can see all of the responses in this item.
|
scott
|
|
response 11 of 63:
|
May 23 17:27 UTC 2003 |
Heh. Polytarp figured it out first, Chad.
|
tod
|
|
response 12 of 63:
|
May 23 17:44 UTC 2003 |
I have an idea. Let's derail this bid and turn the item into a chat about the
ignore command.
|
kip
|
|
response 13 of 63:
|
May 23 17:58 UTC 2003 |
$13.00
|
polytarp
|
|
response 14 of 63:
|
May 23 19:59 UTC 2003 |
$13.01
|
fuzzball
|
|
response 15 of 63:
|
May 24 04:09 UTC 2003 |
oh. i get it
if I have someone on permannant ignore i cant see their responces?
tricky.....
-Chad C.
|
oval
|
|
response 16 of 63:
|
May 24 15:33 UTC 2003 |
it is the point.
|
aruba
|
|
response 17 of 63:
|
May 26 05:42 UTC 2003 |
High bid on the training course is $13.01, made by polytarp on Friday the
23rd.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 18 of 63:
|
May 27 01:50 UTC 2003 |
WHAT?!?! SOMEONE HACKED ME! I DON"T WANT IT ANYMORE ,HLEP!
|
polytarp
|
|
response 19 of 63:
|
May 27 01:51 UTC 2003 |
LISTEN, LET"S PUT IT THIS WAY: I"LL SEND GREX 13.01 USD OR MORE! BUT NO_ONE
SEND ME ANYTHING OR ELSE
|
polytarp
|
|
response 20 of 63:
|
May 27 01:57 UTC 2003 |
By the way, you guys should feel lucky; technically, MINORS CANNOT ENTER INTO
A CONTRACT WHATSOEVER. THEREFORE, I WIN EITHER WAY.
THanks,
FATty.
|
aruba
|
|
response 21 of 63:
|
May 27 15:20 UTC 2003 |
Bids in the auction are not a contract, but they are a promise to pay what
you bid, if you win the bidding. I'm confused by responses 18 and 19. Are
you withdrawing your bid or not, polytarp? I'm not playing this game of in
and out - either you're a serious bidder, or you won't be allowed to bid on
anything in the auction.
|
jep
|
|
response 22 of 63:
|
May 27 16:02 UTC 2003 |
Polytarp identified himself, in resp:20, as not being qualified to
enter into a contract. If he feels that way, he shouldn't be bidding
here.
(He's wrong; he can spend cash and that's got to be at least an implied
contract, doesn't it? But I wouldn't think Grex is interested in
getting into legal entanglements if he chooses to regard himself in
that way.)
|
other
|
|
response 23 of 63:
|
May 27 16:41 UTC 2003 |
Given the user and the circumstances, the safe bet would be to
automatically disregard anything entered into the auction conference by
this user, including both bids and donation items.
I don't know if Backtalk is designed to allow blacklisting of specific
users, but given the nature of the bidding process, it is definitely
worth considering in order to minimize confusion and preserve the
integrity of the process.
|
tod
|
|
response 24 of 63:
|
May 27 17:03 UTC 2003 |
I think polytarp still wants to participate in the auction of this item. He's
just stated that if he wins, he does not want to actually receive the
item(although) he'll still contribute the winning amount.
|
