|
Grex > Agora56 > #125: Kludge Report Part C -- Die, You Little Black Babies | |
|
| Author |
Message |
klg
|
|
Kludge Report Part C -- Die, You Little Black Babies
| 
Feb 24 12:09 UTC 2006 |
Pro-abortion forces in the US must be pleased with the following report
(targeting black immigrants). (Say, doesn't the Netherlands also
support euthanasia?? Do you think it's just a coincidence? Yeah,
probably.)
Mandatory abortion proposed in Holland: Official calls for debate to
deal with issue of unwanted children
Posted: February 21, 2006, WorldNetDaily.com
A health official in the Netherlands has called for a debate on the
idea of forced abortion and contraception to deal with what she sees as
a crisis of unwanted children. Alderman Marianne van den Anker of the
Leefbaar Rotterdam Party wants specifically to target communities of
Antilleans and Arubans where she sees the biggest problems of unwanted
children. . .
The target groups for her program are Antillean teenage mothers; drug
addicts and people with mental handicaps . . . Van den Anker said
children from these groups run an unacceptable risk of growing up
without love and with violence, neglect, mistreatment and sexual
abuse.
|
| 331 responses total. |
johnnie
|
|
response 1 of 331:
|
Feb 24 12:42 UTC 2006 |
Geez, "klg"--don't tell me you've run out of half-wit fourth-rate
American politicians to hold up as objects of ridicule of all things
Lefty. Points, though, for going with the Netherlands rather than the
more obvious, say, France or Russia.
|
richard
|
|
response 2 of 331:
|
Feb 24 15:21 UTC 2006 |
they do that in china, where because of overpopulation you aren't legally
allowed to have more than two children per family.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 3 of 331:
|
Feb 24 15:33 UTC 2006 |
I'm sure that pro-abortion forces in the US would be pleased with this
if they existed. Pro-choice forces, on the other hand, feel otherwise.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 4 of 331:
|
Feb 24 15:47 UTC 2006 |
As much as all the pro-life would like to think so, pro-choice does NOT
equal pro-abortion.
|
tod
|
|
response 5 of 331:
|
Feb 24 16:28 UTC 2006 |
re #0
"Die, You Little Black Babies"
LMAO! Crass but funny!
|
johnnie
|
|
response 6 of 331:
|
Feb 24 16:33 UTC 2006 |
The nitwit in #0 (I mean the politician, not "klg") isn't promoting
abortion per se, anyway; she's arguing for eugenics, which is a whole
other controversy.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 7 of 331:
|
Feb 24 16:36 UTC 2006 |
In all fairness, pro-abortion as used by most of us means pro-abortion-
rights. Its like pro-gun-rights being shortened to pro-gun. Being pro-
gun doesn't mean we want to force everybody to own a gun. Capice?
|
jadecat
|
|
response 8 of 331:
|
Feb 24 16:48 UTC 2006 |
No, pro-choice is already a term in use that better describes the
position- which is vastly different than pro-abortion. I'm
anti-abortion, but pro-choice. I think woman have the right to have a
choice in whether they continue a pregenancy or not. If that choice is
TO continue I support that too.
|
tod
|
|
response 9 of 331:
|
Feb 24 16:59 UTC 2006 |
No, klg was right on target describing me. I'm pro-abortion. I think
abortions should be a contact sport held in Winter Olympics. Half those guys
you see as oil execs probably caused several on their golf outing trysts.
Heck, GW Bush even caused one.
|
johnnie
|
|
response 10 of 331:
|
Feb 24 17:04 UTC 2006 |
It should be noted, too, that many anti-abortion types don't like being
called "anti-abortion"; they prefer "pro-life".
|
marcvh
|
|
response 11 of 331:
|
Feb 24 17:09 UTC 2006 |
I have never heard someone use the term "pro-abortion" with reference
to themselves in a serious context; it's a label which is pretty much
exclusively used by people who oppose it, which should provide a hint
as to its accuracy.
By contrast, "pro-gun" is a term which many people do use to refer to
themselves rather than to other people, which leads me to believe that
they consider it an appropriate phrasing. This makes sense if you think
about it; lots of NRA members will freely brag about how many guns they
own and how many more they would like to own, while very few Planned
Parenthood members will freely brag about how many abortions they've had
and how any more they would like to have in the future.
|
tod
|
|
response 12 of 331:
|
Feb 24 17:10 UTC 2006 |
Ceaucescu was pro-life
|
klg
|
|
response 13 of 331:
|
Feb 24 17:10 UTC 2006 |
RW - Red China is a repressive totalitarian regime. The Netherlands
isn't . . . . . quite yet.
Johnny/johnnie
Try not to use words you don't understand.
eu gen ics [ yoo j nniks ] noun
Definitions: selective breeding as proposed human improvement: the
proposed improvement of the human species by encouraging or permitting
reproduction of only those people with genetic characteristics judged
desirable.
The proposal deals with reducing the number of poor, unwanted, unhappy
children, not with breeding by genetic characteristics.
Now, does anyone actually have anything substantive to say?
|
edina
|
|
response 14 of 331:
|
Feb 24 17:49 UTC 2006 |
Well then what would you call it?
|
johnnie
|
|
response 15 of 331:
|
Feb 24 18:11 UTC 2006 |
Blondie wants to use forced contraception and abortion ("selective
breeding") to cut down on the number of children born to black folk,
drug addicts, and the mentally handicapped ("genetic characteristics")
to make the Netherlands a better place ("proposed improvement"). Fits
the definition well enough for me, Ran--er, "klg".
|
keesan
|
|
response 16 of 331:
|
Feb 24 18:21 UTC 2006 |
Babies born to drug users (this includes caffeine and nicotine and alcohol)
have lower birth weight and more genetic defects.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 17 of 331:
|
Feb 24 18:50 UTC 2006 |
no shit?
|
tod
|
|
response 18 of 331:
|
Feb 24 18:52 UTC 2006 |
My brother was a HUGE PUMPKIN and mom drank and smoked like Jerry Lee Lewis
locked in a bowling alley.
|
jep
|
|
response 19 of 331:
|
Feb 24 20:08 UTC 2006 |
re resp:10: I am anti-abortion. I am anti-choice on abortion. I am
pro-life in that I favor the life of the fetus over the choice of it's
mother. I oppose the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision.
My order of preference on the social issue of abortion is:
1. Constitutional Amendment illegalizing abortion
2. National law illegalizing abortion
3. Overthrow of Roe v Wade, returning the issue to the states to decide
4. Restrictions on techniques, drugs, doctors, hospitals, etc.
Say it how you want to say it, my opinion is that abortion is bad and
that it is murder of an innocent child. The label you use doesn't
matter to me.
|
tod
|
|
response 20 of 331:
|
Feb 24 20:21 UTC 2006 |
I have sort of the same opinion except my opinion is that guys shouldn't be
allowed to vote on a woman's body nor should they be allowed to support a war
if they're not a veteran nor have the capacity/intention to enlist.
I am in favor of the life of our military and women over that of pussies.
Unless a guy is willing to submit to shitting a 12 lb bowling ball, then he
should keep his laws off women.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 21 of 331:
|
Feb 24 20:24 UTC 2006 |
resp: 19 Because women just don't matter.
If abortion is illegal than EVERY single man who impregnates a woman had
better be legally liable for part of her health care and the needs for
that child. Lawmakers had better get off their asses and make sure that
there are actually some responsible men out there who are also forced to
take care of a responsiblity they don't want.
|
tod
|
|
response 22 of 331:
|
Feb 24 20:27 UTC 2006 |
re #21
I agree. Any guy who gets a fat chick pregnant should have to marry her if
they overturn Roe v. Wade. Then, we can turn our clocks back to the 1950's
and watch Ricky beat Lucy's ass for burning his toast.
*rolls eyes*
Banning abortion is the dumbest idea ever.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 23 of 331:
|
Feb 24 20:32 UTC 2006 |
Heh, well maybe not marry- but definitely be in as deep financially as
she is. And provide medical care for the kid, AND be there like she has
to be, and so on. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
|
keesan
|
|
response 24 of 331:
|
Feb 24 20:32 UTC 2006 |
How about passing a national health care bill that at least takes care of the
health of all the unwanted babies that would be born if abortion were made
illegal (also the health of anyone getting an illegal abortion that they
survive). Why are the conservatives so often in favor of making more unwanted
babies but not taking care of them once they are born? Would conservatives
oppose free prenatal and postnatal health care for all mothers?
|