You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-35         
 
Author Message
gull
Bush Nominates Another Extremist Mark Unseen   Oct 23 13:52 UTC 2003

Janice Brown is yet another example of George W. Bush's tendancy to
favor ideology over qualifications.  The California Judicial Nominations
Evaluating Commission rated Brown not qualified for the state supreme
court on two occasions.  In addition, a large minority of the ABA
Federal Judiciary Committee found her not qualified for the D.C.
Circuit, and *no* member of that committee rated her as well-qualified.  

She has strongly pro-corporate leanings, and is willing to ignore
established precident in order to support them.  For example, she wrote
a dissenting opinion in a case involving the firing of a worker who blew
the whistle on a company that was shipping defective parts for
airplanes, arguing that the government had no right to create exceptions
to at-will employment.  She also dissented in a case accusing Nike of
making false statements, arguing that commercial speech should be
protected in the same manner as individual speech and that a precident
set 60 years ago should be overturned:  "In 1942, the United States
Supreme Court, like a wizard trained at Hogwarts, waved its wand and
plucked the commercial doctrine out of thin air."

She has expressed strongly anti-government views in her writings and
public speeches: "Some things are apparent.  Where government moves in,
community retreats, civil society disintegrates, and our ability to
control our own destiny atrophies. ...The result is a debased, debauched
culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."

In a 1999 speech, she argued that the Bill of Rights is not incorporated
into the 14th amendment, and thus none of the First Amendment
protections restrict what state governments can do.  This is a pretty
frightening position from someone who would presumably be in line for a
Supreme Court position.

My suspicion is that the Republican majority will fully support her,
both because of her strong right-wing positions and because, as a Bush
nominee, they're practically obligated to.  Because she's black, if the
Democrats filibuster to try to block her appointment the Republicans
will play the race card.  In fact, this has already started: "She is a
conservative African-American woman, and for some that alone
disqualifies her nomination to the D.C. circuit." -- Orrin Hatch.

Links:

Alliance for Justice report:
http://www.independentjudiciary.com/resources/docs/Brown%20Report%20FINAL.p
df
Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100900,00.html
35 responses total.
other
response 1 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 14:30 UTC 2003

Someone PLEASE kill Karl Rove NOW!!
jp2
response 2 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 15:42 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

klg
response 3 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 16:40 UTC 2003

Justice for Justice Brown
Debra Saunders, October 23, 2003 
Be clear why the Congressional Black Caucus and other so-called civil-
rights groups oppose California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers 
Brown's appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia.  It is not because Brown wrote a decision that upheld 
Proposition 209, the voter-approved initiative that ended racial and 
gender preferences in California state hiring, contracting and 
admissions.  It's not because she was on the losing side of a 4-3 
California Supreme Court ruling that overturned a law requiring 
parental consent for a minor's abortion. 
What really gets under caucus members' thin skins is that Janice Rogers 
Brown is a black conservative.
You see, the all-Democratic caucus holds that it alone represents the 
African American community, that the Democratic Party essentially owns 
black Americans and that African Americans owe the Democratic Party.  
Thus, caucus members will hound any black person who escapes the 
liberal plantation. . . .
tod
response 4 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 16:49 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 5 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 17:40 UTC 2003

I watched Sen. Durkins commentary on Justice Brown, and it was quite
critical of her extreme neoconservative views. Her response, though, was
mostly to act personally injured about the cartoon about her that Durkin
brought up - probably the least relevant part of his commentary. 

tod
response 6 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 18:18 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mcnally
response 7 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 19:00 UTC 2003

  re #3:  which is no doubt why the Congressional Black Caucus spends
  so much time hounding Colin Powell, right?
other
response 8 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 19:36 UTC 2003

As expected, klg reduces matters of priciple to matters of race.
other
response 9 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 19:36 UTC 2003

s/priciple/principle
krj
response 10 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 19:53 UTC 2003

Rane in resp:5 :: "neoconservative" really gets badly abused these
days.  It does *not* mean "extreme conservative."   The Bush
administration has a lot of neocons in it, but they are by no means
the whole pie, and in Congress the neoconservatives do not have 
excessive power.

The original neocons were former leftists, in some case out-and-out
communists, who switched sides in the Cold War, more or less. 
Neocons these days are more concerned with global power issues and 
support using America's power to reshape the world in our favor.
Neoconservatives led us into the recent war in Iraq, 
they'd been pushing for such a war for years before Sept. 11 2001.
 
But outside of a general tilt towards business interests and away
from individuals, I don't see the neocons as having as extreme a 
domestic agenda as is ascribed to Justice Brown in these postings.
I've never heard anyone I think of as a neoconservative argue that 
the 14th amendment should not apply to the states.
 
One might better characterize these views as "paleoconservative;"
a leading spokesman for this point of view is Pat Buchanan, who was
passionately against the war in Iraq.
 
The Neocon/Paleocon split within the Republican party pops up 
in a number of places.  In general:
  
   The Neoconservatives support the projection of American power 
   overseas, and they are passionate supporters of Israel.  
   On US social issues they are generally quiet, though I'm willing
   to listen to folks tell me I'm wrong on that.  
 
   The Paleoconservatives want to strip the Federal government of 
   power; they want America to stop meddling overseas and they are 
   critical of support for Israel.  They tend to extreme social 
   conservative views: anti-gay, pro-fundamentalist-Christian, 
   anti-social-services.  They are rabidly anti-taxation.
   In general, I characterize them as wanting to repeal the 20th 
   century.  :)
 
But I digress.
gull
response 11 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 19:59 UTC 2003

Re #3: Did I call it, or what?

The Republicans are hoping that, by playing the race card, they can get
a black ultraconservative into a position where they can't get a white
ultraconservative.
tod
response 12 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 20:12 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

sabre
response 13 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 02:01 UTC 2003

Ha Ha 
The cocksucking liberals looked like the bigots and FOOLS they are in
contesting this fin example of black womenhod. Janice is a perfect judge.
The republicans made the liberals look like the far left commies they really
are. The election will go quite well for us. I hope the stupid ass democrats
contest every one Bush nominates. It will only result in a total exposure of
their sick and perverted agenda. America is a conservative nation.64% of all
Americans claim to be conservative.

gull you are one stupid bastard. I have beat your sorry ass in every debate
you summoned the courage to challenge me in. You finally twit filtered me
because your arguements were so weak they couldn't withstand my great
debating skills. I will agree on one thing though...you are a great
masterbater....you sick nut-chinned anal assassin.
Henceforth I shall call you the nut-ninja.
asddsa
response 14 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 05:33 UTC 2003

re 13 He's a ninja but he doesn't use a machette?! He only masturbates?!  You
live in a sorry world indeed if that's all your ninjas can do.
gull
response 15 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 22:58 UTC 2003

Re #13: Respond to some of the actual points in my message and we can have a
debate.  So far all you've done is name-calling, which I'm not really
interested in.
tod
response 16 of 35: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 13:01 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tsty
response 17 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 3 09:09 UTC 2003

florida? what happened to oklahoma?!
po
tod
response 18 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 3 16:33 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tsty
response 19 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 5 10:00 UTC 2003

wellll. i suspect not, but i any case, it wouldn't be tounge ...
tod
response 20 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 5 18:38 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

klg
response 21 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 17:40 UTC 2003

PROOF THAT GOD EXITS!!

            (How else can you explain this miracle??)

The Washington Times reports Al Sharpton, racial demagogue and 
Democratic presidential candidate, urges Democratic senators not to 
filibuster President Bush's nomination of Justice Janice Rogers Brown 
for the Circuit Court of Appeals. "I don't agree with her politics. I 
don't agree with some of her background," Sharpton says. "But she 
should get an up-or-down vote."

Sharpton's comments came in the wake of a news conference by "black 
leaders" . . . whose idea of "civil rights" is to demand rigid 
ideological uniformity from all black would-be public servants.  "Mr. 
Sharpton echoed the concerns of many conservatives-especially black 
conservatives-that Justice Brown is being opposed because she doesn't 
conform to the Democratic ideology that many blacks espouse," reports 
the Times.
rcurl
response 22 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 17:46 UTC 2003

What's the "miracle" in this? It was someone  expressing an opinion. People
do that all the time.
klg
response 23 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 17:58 UTC 2003

Rev. Al don't just change like that.  Praise the Lord.  Halleluyah.
rcurl
response 24 of 35: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 18:04 UTC 2003

I think it is very consistent for Sharpton. She is, after all, Black.
 0-24   25-35         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss