You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-23   24-48   49-52        
 
Author Message
keesan
Eating cheaply as a vegetarian/vegan Mark Unseen   Jun 16 19:54 UTC 2007

This item is for discussing Colleen's no-reply item on eating a meat diet on
a budget.
52 responses total.
cmcgee
response 1 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 20:13 UTC 2007

Item 244 is the item for discussions about Item 243.
keesan
response 2 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 20:30 UTC 2007

Protein requirement according to WHO - .45 g protein per kg body mass. 

US and UK recommend .8 g protein per kg, still not difficult to obtain on a
vegetarian diet.  Another 15 g is just over 1 cup of beans.

Assuming 50 kg (110 lb), 22.5 g protein.

Protein contents of grains
brown rice - 1 cup - 232 calories - 5 g (similar for other grains)
oatmeal   - 1 cup - 145 calories - 6 g
bread (whole wheat) - 2 slices - 130 calories - 4.3 g
popcorn - 5 cups air popped - 150 calories - 5 g

Beans:
blackeyed peas 1 cup 190 calories 12.8 g protein - 2 cups of beans alone would
give you your daily protein requirement but not nearly enough calories.
kidney beans 1 cup 230 cal 14.5 g protein

Soybeans 1 cup cooked - 235 calories - 19.8 g protein - 12 cal/gram.
Tofu 120 g piece 86 cal 9.5 g protein - 9 cal/gram.
40 g protein = 4 pieces of tofu (about a pound).

peanut butter - 1 tbsp - 95 calories - 4.6 g

sunflower seeds - 1/4 cup - 205 cal/8.2 g protein - 34 cal/g

Potato  - 1 small boiled  120 calories 2.5 g protein.- 48 cal/gm
Large baked with skin 4.9 g protein

Spinach 1 cup cooked 41 cal 5.3 g protein

Mushrooms 1/2 cup cooked 21 cal 1.7 g protein - 12 cal/gram

Bok choi 1 cup 20 calories 2.6 g protein - 8 cal/gram protein
Broccolli - 1 spear 42 cal 4.5 g protein - 9 cal/gram protein

Onion - 1 cup raw 54 cal/1.9 g protein  - 28 cal/gm

Fish:
Tuna - 3 oz - 175 calories - 24 g protein - 7 calories per gram protein.  

Assuming 1500 calories/day needed for active lifestyle, and as much as 40 
g/protein, you would need to average 38 calories per gram of protein for 
an exact match of caloric and protein needs.   That would be difficult to 
do on a healthy diet - you would need to add a lot of sugar and fat.

Fried apple pie - 255 calories 2.2 g protein - 115 cal/g protein.
Corn chips - 1 -  155 cal/2 g protein - 77 cal/g protein
Cookie - 235 cal/2 g - 117 g/cal protein
Mayonnaise -  1 tbsp - 100/.2 - 500 cal/g
Granola (homemade) - 1 cup 595 cal/2.2 g protein - 270 cal/g
        (granola is full of oil and sugar)

People who eat a lot of junk would need to add meat to their diet to get 
enough protein without overdoing the calories.

If you eat whole foods, it would be nearly impossible not to get 25 g
protein in a 1500 calorie diet.

If you ate just potatoes, 1500 calories of potatoes provides 31 gm protein 
(50% more than the WHO requirement).  Just brown rice - 32 gm protein.  
Just beans - 100 gm (4 times the WHO requirement).  Colleen claims you 
cannot get enough protein from beans relative to the calories.

She also claims B12 pills cost more than meat.  I just found them $8/100 
(or about 12 cents/pill) online but Kroger is cheaper.  Nutritional yeast 
tastes better and has B12.
keesan
response 3 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 20:31 UTC 2007

1 slipped.  This can be the item for discussing protein and vegans.
keesan
response 4 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 14:11 UTC 2007

Colleen claims to need .7 g protein per pound body weight.  What I read is 
that the World Health Organization calls for .45 g / kg and the US and UK 
for .8 g/kg.  Colleen claims .7 g/lb.  One kg = 2.2 lb.  Assuming Colleen 
misread kg as lb, divide her 63-76 g protein per day by 2.2 to get 29-35 g 
protein per day.  The US RDAs are higher than most people need because 
they include more of the bell curve (people with unusually high 
requirements).  WHO requirements would be 22.5.  5-7 cups of grain would 
do it if you are not avoiding carbohydrates, in less than 1200 calories.

Potatoes have their protein mainly just under the skin.  Therefore a baked 
potato has more protein than a PEELED boiled one.  We microwave or 
pressure cook them in the skins, dip in cold water, and slip off the 
skins.

You can get enough B12 (100% of daily requirement) from multivitamins, 
which are really cheap.  The B12 pills are much higher doses, for people 
who don't absorb well, such as my friend who had part of her stomach 
removed due to cancer.

Colleen, what medical condition requires limiting carbohydrates to 100 
g/day?  Are you allowed more than this if you eat whole grains, which are 
digested more slowly?

I keep my bulk foods in 5 gal jugs on the stairway to the basement in my 
600 sq ft apartment, but there is plenty of room for food storage in other 
places such as under the bed.  50 lb fits in about 2 jugs.  
jadecat
response 5 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 14:34 UTC 2007

However, not everyone can take a multivitamin daily. Like me. They have
too much vit-c in them. 

I rather like eating baked potatoes with the skin. Or mashed potatoes
made with some of the skin left on the tater. Then again, I pretty much
like any form of tater. :)
keesan
response 6 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 15:06 UTC 2007

You can buy just B vitamin pills too.  
jadecat
response 7 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 15:38 UTC 2007

The multi-B pill that I get from Foods for Living (a health food store
here in Lansing) is about $20 for a couple hundred pills.
cmcgee
response 8 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 16:03 UTC 2007

I didn't misread anything, Sindi.  That is the formula my doctor said to use.
It is pounds, not kilograms of body weight.
cmcgee
response 9 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 16:09 UTC 2007

Sindi, I'm not going to post personal medical information on the Internet.
cmcgee
response 10 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 17:06 UTC 2007

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 11 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 19:56 UTC 2007

Do you know why your doctor recommends three times as much protein as WHO?
I posted lots of personal medical information and got lots of useful
suggestions in return.  Is it possible your doctor meant kg and said lb?
cmcgee
response 12 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 22:20 UTC 2007

Yes, I do know.  YMMV. No, it is not possible.  
cmcgee
response 13 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 00:15 UTC 2007

On my way to finding something else, I ran across this article that
takes eating cheaply as a vegetarian/vegan to a whole new level.

From http://www.living-foods.com/faq.html

Why would someone want to eat a raw and living foods diet?

There are many reasons why people eat a raw and living foods diet.

   1. Health: Persons embracing this type of diet invariably experience
improvements in their general physical and mental status, including more
energy, better health, more energy <smile>, weight loss, detoxification,
and a sturdier immune system that better resists and recovers from just
about any kind of disease... and the list goes on...

***2. Energy efficiency: Since you no longer have to cook, you don't
waste electricity, and save the environment.***

   3. Since you eat organic agriculture, you help to save the planet.
Most become more in-tune with their body; many report definite spiritual
improvements.

   4. No animal products are used, so the animals appreciate it.

What do raw/living foodists eat?

Raw and Living Foodist eat all fruits, vegetables, sprouts, nuts, seeds,
grains, sea vegetables, and other organic/natural foods that have not
been processed.  

In some instances, there are special ways to prepare the foods (example:
most raw and living foodists soak/sprout nuts, seeds and grains before
consuming them).  For some delicious recipes, see our recipe section!
slynne
response 14 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 00:30 UTC 2007

Oh man. I once had a roommate who was a raw-foods vegan. He often had 
conflicts with the rest of us in the house about cooking meat in the 
kitchen. He swore that the 'meat fumes' were making him sick. So we all 
decided that the rule was going to be, 'no cooking meat when [roommate] 
was home'  We stuck to that rule too but we started a 'meat journal' 
around that time where we took photographs of the cooking meat and 
described the cooking of the meat and the subsequent eating of the 
meat. When we filled the pages, we presented it to our other roommate. 
slynne
response 15 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 00:32 UTC 2007

Oh and another time we saved all of our bones for weeks and then put 
them in a shoebox which we then labeled a "Jeffrey Dahmer jigsaw 
puzzle". Then the one of us whose idea it was wrapped it up and gave it 
to the vegan roommate for Christmas. 
cmcgee
response 16 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 03:09 UTC 2007

Vegetarian Times,  Jan, 2005  by Katherine Tallmadge
Ask the nutritionist: about getting enough protein

Q:

As a fairly new vegetarian, I'm not sure I'm getting enough protein. Is
there a formula to figure out how much I need, and is age ever a factor?

A:

Protein is the major component of all of your body's cells, and you're
right, it's important to make sure you're getting enough. Recent
research indicates that we may need more than previously thought. The
recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for all adults is 0.37 grams of
protein per pound of body weight, or about 15 percent of your daily
calories.

But you probably need more if you exercise, if you're dieting and as you
age. One dramatic study of 855 people found that those who ate just the
RDA of protein had alarming bone losses compared to those who ate more
than the RDA. Those who ate the least protein lost the most bone mass--4
percent in four years. People who ate the most protein (about 20 percent
of calories) had the smallest losses--less than 1.5 percent in four
years, reported the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research in 2000.
Although the study was done on older men and women, the results may be
important for all adults. "When you're young, you need protein to build
bone. After age 30, you need it to keep bone from being lost," says
Kathleen Tucker, associate professor of Nutritional Epidemiology at
Tufts University. "Keeping bones strong is a life-long effort."

Dieters, take note: New research has found that a protein-dense diet may
be essential for weight loss. It helps maximize fat loss while
minimizing muscle loss. That's important because "losing muscle slows
your resting metabolic rate--the speed at which your body burns
calories. That makes it harder to maintain a healthy weight and lose
fat," says William Evans, director of the Nutrition, Metabolism, and
Exercise Laboratory at the Donald W Reynolds Center on Aging at the
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Many of us don't get the RDA for protein. Roughly 25 percent of adults
over age 20, and 40 percent of those age 70 and up, fall below it,
according to United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics,
let alone eat enough to protect bones or muscle. And thin women, dieting
women and elderly women--who are especially vulnerable to the ravages of
bone and muscle loss--are notoriously low on protein. "Losing muscle
causes older people to become weak and frail," says Evans.

"It seems pretty clear that older adults may need more protein," agrees
dietitian Reed Mangels, nutrition advisor to the Vegetarian Resource
Group and co-author of The Dietitian's Guide to Vegetarian Diets. 

Based on the new findings, I now recommend that moderately active people
and older adults increase their protein to about 20 percent of their
calories, or 0.45-0.54 grams per pound of ideal body weight. If you're
an athlete or body builder, you may need even more.
cmcgee
response 17 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 04:06 UTC 2007

View hidden response.

cmcgee
response 18 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 04:21 UTC 2007

The hidden response is an abstract of an article in a peer-reviewed
journal about increased protein needs in the elderly (subjects were 55 -
70 years old) published in 2001.

It includes an additional list of 16 articles on that subject published
since then, some of which are as recent as May and June of 2007.

The term "sarcopenia" is the medical term for loss of muscle mass and
strength, a problem similar to osteoporosis, loss of bone mass.  

About a third of muscle mass is lost in old age. This loss of mass
reduces the performance of muscles. Due to the increasing number of
elderly people, sarcopenia is an increasing health issue in the
developed world.
cmcgee
response 19 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 12:57 UTC 2007

According to the 2006 report of the National Academy of Sciences Food
and Nutrition Board, my doctor's recommendation is well within their
guidelines.  
---------------------------

The Institute of Medicine serves as adviser to the nation to improve
health. 

Established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of
Sciences, the Institute of Medicine provides independent, objective,
evidence-based advice to policymakers, health professionals, the private
sector, and the public.  

Institute of Medicine Of the National Academies.        
                        
Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty
Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids    


Released On:   
        September 05, 2002

This report is the fifth in a series of reports from the Food and
Nutrition Board presenting dietary reference values for the intake of
nutrients by Americans and Canadians.

This new report establishes ranges for fat, carbohydrates and protein
and stresses the importance of balancing diet with exercise. Highlights
of the report include:

    * Adults should get 10 to 35 percent of their calories from protein.

------------------------------

Since my doctor's recommendation is 30-33%, there doesn't seem to be a
problem.  

One thing should be made clear here:  

While my eating pattern deviates from the 1985 guidelines, the
deviations are based on current science and my individual situation.  

Young, healthy adults fit the "normal" pattern that Sindi has
recommended so frequently, and would fare just fine on the older
guidelines.  

As best I can tell, most of us here have some obvious variations away
from normal, either because of weight, age, or previous medical
conditions.  It is short-sighted to continue to apply normal guidelines
in that case.  

If you know that you deviate from the "reference human" upon which the
guidelines rely, it only makes sense to deviate from those guidelines
based on your own situation.  

Individuals need to eat in ways that are best for them.  This includes
getting advice from professionals in the nutrition field, which is not
limited to MDs.   

The vegan eating pattern that Sindi proselytizes for is an extreme
subset of the more common vegetarian eating pattern.  As with most
fundamentalist belief systems, believers work very hard to demonstrate
that nonbelievers are not interpreting things correctly.    

The vegan can be the correct pattern for a normal person, but it may not
 be the best pattern for an individual.  Only that individual can make
that decision.  Getting advice from professionals in addition to
apostles is wise.    
keesan
response 20 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 14:11 UTC 2007

Your study showed that people who ate 20% of their calories as protein had
no bone loss (or minimal bone loss), so why does your doctor recommend almost
twice that?  You can get your protein balance measured (by testing what comes
out in the urine and feces) to determine your actual needs.

The RDA is supposed to be adequate for 97.5% of the population - .83 g/kg.
The median requirement is .65 g/kg.
jadecat
response 21 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 14:21 UTC 2007

resp:20 Sindi, in my reading of Colleen's responses, she's said her Dr.
was recommending about 30 or so percent, that's not twice 20%...
slynne
response 22 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 14:31 UTC 2007

Sindi, Doctors, like everyone else, have opinions. Colleen's doctor 
evidently has a different opinion about protein intake than you do but 
Colleen seems pretty happy with her doctor's recommendations. My 
opinion is that you are both right. It probably wouldnt hurt an adult 
to eat the amount of protein you think is correct. But it also probably 
wont hurt a person to eat an amount of protein Colleen's doctor thinks 
is correct. 
keesan
response 23 of 52: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 15:04 UTC 2007

30-33% is close to double 20%. 1.5-1.7X.  Colleen said she was trying for /13
which is 33.3%.

A bit more internet reading reveals there is now a fad high-protein
weight-loss diet which the American Heart Association warns against, partly
because of the high-fat results (usually much of it saturated). 
Recommendations are usually to keep fat under 30% of your total calories, not
1/3.  Eating more protein than you need also results in the production of
nitrogenous metabolic byproducts (ketone bodies) which may be what another
site (http://www.starbulltein.com/1999/10/13/features/health.html) refers
to as acidic products which are neutralized with calcium, which gets excreted
in the urine.  The sulfur which is found more in animal than plant protein may
be what they mean here (sulfuric acid?).  People who eat too much protein need
to also eat more calcium.  

Colleen's protein intake is probably not in the dangerous range, but is most
likely more than required, which can be measured by tests.  Since most
Americans eat too much protein (in the same range) the calcium RDA probably
reflects this increased need for calcium.  

I ran across mention of studies showing that people who ate more protein (this
was about 110 g/day) had a 20% greater likelihood of breaking a wrist, due
to calcium loss from bones.  

Colleen, have you been tested for osteoporis?  Are you making sure to eat
plenty of calcium along with all that protein?  Will your insurance cover
protein balance testing to determine if you are really eating for zero
nitrogen balance?

After all the fad diets that avoid sugar (saccharine etc), starch (carbs),
and fat, I guess it is time for a protein fad.  Are we over the oat-bran fiber
fad already?
 0-23   24-48   49-52        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss