You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-19   20-41         
 
Author Message
slynne
Nutrition Tool Mark Unseen   Mar 14 19:23 UTC 2007

I came across a pretty useful tool for anyone interested in diet and
nutrition. I had to do a diet analysis for school but I was also curious
about how bad my diet really is, especially since I have been trying to
eat intuitively. 

The link is:

http://mypyramidtracker.gov/default.htm

This is a site where you can enter everything you eat in a day and get
nutritional information not just for one item but for one's entire day
of eating. If one does enough days, one can track trends. I kept a food
diary for a month. I wrote down every thing I ate, even if it was just
2-3 M&M's from the gumball machine at work. 

What I found is that I eat about 80% of the calories that should
maintain my weight. Not surprising to me really. I have always known
that weight is more than just how many calories one eats. I still eat a
lot of calories though (an average of 2320 per day). My worst day had
almost 4000 calories and I had skipped breakfast! That's what eating
almost a whole large pepperoni pizza will do. go figure. 

My total caloric percentages from carbohydrates, proteins, and fats are
as follows: Carbohydrates 56%; Proteins 13%; Fat 31%.  These values do
not differ more than 2% from any of the USDA recommended percentages of
55% of calories from Carbohydrates, 15% of calories from proteins, and
30% of calories from fat.  

Honestly, that kind of surprised me because I would have thought that I
eat way more fat than that. I am going to continue with the food diary
and see if I keep getting the same results. 

Anyhow, I just wanted to share that tool for folks who are curious about
exactly what they eat. 

41 responses total.
furs
response 1 of 41: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 00:02 UTC 2007

I use www.fitday.com to track mine.  I average around 1800-2000 a day,
which I know is not enough, especially since I'm training to be in a
triathlon. But it's hard for me to eat more.
slynne
response 2 of 41: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 00:52 UTC 2007

Jeanne? Do you find yourself feeling hungry a lot? If not, you are
probably eating enough. 

A triathalon? That is sooooo awesome! When is it?
furs
response 3 of 41: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 10:35 UTC 2007

well, the main one I've been training for is July 22.  It's a 1/2 mile
swim, 12 mile bike and 3 mile run.  But I'm doing a small indoor one
this weekend for training (it's 20 minutes swim, bike & run each
indoors)  And my crazy cousin who talked me into this in the first place
has another one in mind in June that we might do.  This one is a 1/4
mile swim, 10 mile bike and 3 mile run, so we might do it as practice.

Well, my rule is if I'm hungry I eat.  So really the only time I get
super hungry is in the mornings when i wake up.  So do feel like I'm
eating all the time, I eat about 6 meals a day.  I'm sure I have days
that I eat more than 2000, but I think I had a couple this week where I
only had 1600.  So  it just depends on how I feel from day to day.  But
I'm eating a lot of fruits and veggies so I feel like I"m eating a ton
of quantity.
mary
response 4 of 41: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 12:32 UTC 2007

I too like fitday.  All of these programs are a nice way to keep
portion-creep in check.  I tend to fall into the pattern of 
thinking I'm eating mostly healthy stuff, so I can eat all I want.
Wrong.  It doesn't matter if it's ice cream or apples if 
I'm eating more than what I'm burning, I'll be carrying
it around for a while. 

I'll check out the link.  Thanks, Lynne.
denise
response 5 of 41: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 18:06 UTC 2007

Jeanne, that's so cool about doing the triathlons!  Let us know when 
and where and perhaps we can get a cheering section for you. :-)
cmcgee
response 6 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 15:17 UTC 2007

View hidden response.

cmcgee
response 7 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 15:24 UTC 2007

Here's the abstract of the article in the hidden Response 6:  

Portion-control dishes helped people with diabetes lose weight
Last Updated: Monday, June 25, 2007 | 4:29 PM ET
CBC News


"Eating from plates and cereal bowls marked to show portion sizes helped
people with diabetes to shed pounds comparable to the results of weight
loss drugs, researchers in Alberta found.

As well, more people who used the portion control plates   26 per cent
were also able to decrease their use of diabetes medications after six
months, compared with almost 11 per cent of those who did not receive
the special tableware."

I went online to take a look at the plates.  Essentially they are
different diameter plates, with hand painted pictures and dividing lines
to show what to put on your plate, and how much space it should take up.

I've heard of a similar rule:  1/2 of plate geography for vegetables,
1/4 for breads/grains, and 1/4 for protein.  Looking at this, I realized
that the difference in an 8-inch luncheon plate, a 10-inch dinner plate
and a 12-inch dinner plate can make a huge difference in how much you
consume at a meal.  

Might be time to measure out portions (I'm with Mary on that, I have to
*constantly* retrain my eye to exactly what a 1/2 C serving looks like)
on my favorite plates and see which one is the best size to use in the
1/2, 1/4, 1/4 system.  

edina
response 8 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 15:25 UTC 2007

That's brilliant.  I know that I have been working hard at reducing 
portion size with my husband and I.  What's funny is that he rarely 
goes back for seconds...so I think a lot of it is visual.
slynne
response 9 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 15:44 UTC 2007

I think that something like a plate that helps with portion control is 
a good idea and certainly is better for one's health than other methods 
such as weight loss drugs. 

But I will point out a few things about this study that I think are 
worth noting. 

1. It was a six month study. I would like to see a more long term 
study. There are many methods of losing weight that have some limited 
success at six months. There are many fewer where the weight loss is 
still present at one year and even fewer still where the weight loss is 
still present at five years. 

2. The average weight loss of 1.8 percent of body weight is about 5-6 
pounds lost for a 300lb person. That really isnt much weight loss. I 
wonder if portion control can help with diabetes even if one doesnt 
lose weight? 

3. While 1/4 of the patients in this study who used the plates were 
able to decrease the use of diabetes meds, that is about 15% more than 
would have been able to anyways even without special plates. I wouldnt 
call that a wildly successful program although I am sure that the 15% 
of people who found the plates helpful might disagree.

 I think that since plates dont have side effects like other weight 
loss methods do, at the very least one can say that the plates do no 
harm and may do some very small amount of good. 

mary
response 10 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 16:35 UTC 2007

If I didn't make it an ongoing project to keep my weight down (as best I 
can) (and it is work) I'd easily weigh 300 pounds.  I'd be a very unhappy 
person at that weight and I know my health, both physical and 
emotional, would take a hit.

So how do I figure into your facts about dieting not working?

It works for me although imperfectly.  But that's sure better than
not working at weight loss at all.
mary
response 11 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 16:51 UTC 2007

When visiting Asheville, NC, last winter, I had lunch at a nice bistro.
On the dessert menu they offered a sundae with a clever name, which
escapes me now, but it came with its own dish that you could take home.

I was intrigued.  My sundae came in a little dish (hold 1/2 cup).  It has 
a colorful fun glaze outside and inside around the rim it reads, "Yum time 
is..." and on the very inside bottom, "over".  The little card that came 
with advised to take the dish home and use it for indulgent delights.  
But "...don't overfill it and use it only once a day".  I really enjoyed 
that sundae.  And you know what, when I'd eaten that 1/2 cup it was 
enough.  The taste had worked and more would have been out of habit. I 
left satisfied and feeling I'd made good choices.

I wish more restaurants played with food so nicely.
slynne
response 12 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 17:20 UTC 2007

resp:10 I am not convinced that you would weigh 300 lbs if you didnt 
strictly control your food intake. But clearly you are convinced of 
that and you know your body better than I do. Maybe you are one of 
those 5% of people who have so much self control that they can beat the 
odds. Maybe you are hungry all the time and it is only through serious 
will power that you can keep yourself from eating more than you do. I 
dont know. 

I will say that most people tend to have a natural range and find it 
just as difficult to gain enough weight to move out of that range as 
they do to lose weight to move out of that range. There are things that 
people can do to change their "set point" of course. But generally, 
most people will not weigh 300 lbs even if they allow themselves to eat 
as much as they want to eat. So where does your diet figure into the 
idea of diets not working? Well, I suspect that if you were to just not 
consciously pay attention to portions, you might gain some weight but 
unless you started seriously overeating even when you're not hungry, 
you probably wouldnt gain more than 5 pounds or so. Or maybe you would. 
I dont really know. I can tell you that in the last three months, my 
diet has been *really* bad due to outside factors. And by bad, I mean I 
am eating fast food about 3 times a week which a pretty big increase. I 
analized my calories on the cdc website and have been eating around 
3000 calories a day which is 800 a day more than what I was eating 
before. I have gained no weight. I expect to have more time soon and 
will return to my old habits. I dont expect to lose weight but I do 
expect to feel better.  

Let me ask you this. Are you at a normal BMI or are you considered 
overweight? And if you are overweight, why havent you changed your diet 
such that you end up at a lower BMI? 


FWIW, I have found that portion control has helped me with my eating. I 
say this because I have a tendency to finish what is on my plate and I 
am working on only eating when I am hungry. So I dole out small 
portions but my rule is that if I am still hungry after I eat what is 
on my plate, I can get seconds (or thirds or even fourths or fifths or 
whatever). That does help me because I only get more if I am still 
hungry. That is something different than being on a diet though, imho. 
I dont restrict the amount of food I eat except that I am working on 
reducing "emotional eating"  

As for being unhealthy mentally and physically at 300 lbs. I can say 
that I am not unhealthy at 300 lbs. I probably will eventually become 
unhealthy but that pretty much happens to everybody as they get older 
regardless of their weight. I dont think that weight increases the risk 
of bad physical health significantly. 

I do think that being heavy can be a blow to mental health. But it isnt 
so much the weight that is the problem as people's reactions to it. But 
ok, yes...being fat is hard and stressful and if a person internalizes 
society's messages about fat=lazy, fat=sloth, fat=no willpower, 
etc...then yes, being fat is a good way to feel shitty about oneself. 

mary
response 13 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 22:10 UTC 2007

Require an emergency appendectomy at 300 pounds and then tell me how 
morbid obesity is healthy.  It's a challenge to simply intubate someone 
with such issues.  Diagnosis gets trickier.  Getting the wound to stay 
closed and heal is dicey. And emergency surgery is just one example. 300 
pounds comes with issues you don't have at 150.  But we've had this 
conversation before.

I have been heavier and I know I'll always need to be paying attention
to diet if I don't want to go there again.  And I don't.  And there is
something else too, something I don't quite know how to explain, but
I feel better about myself for trying to be as healthy as I can, even
knowing I'll never make it to ideal.

But there is that word healthy again.  I tend to link weight to 
health.  You don't.  We'll simply have to agree to disagree I guess.
furs
response 14 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 22:23 UTC 2007

I agree with mary, because for me personally I do have to work at not
being 300 lbs.  Been there, but not for 15 years.  I did let a few more
pounds add up over the past 10 years, but over the last 2 years have
taken that back off.  I won't call it a battle, because I'm a lover not
a fighter.  It's just something I'll keep an eye on for all my life,
because I am not happy at a higher weight.  I am happiest now.
slynne
response 15 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 01:52 UTC 2007

I will agree with Mary that fat people simply do not get as good of
medical care as thin people for various reasons from prejudice in the
health care community against fat to the technology and techniques being
generally focused on people of more normal weights. As the average
weight is increasing though, I suspect that the technology will catch up
and there will be better machines for diagnosis and better treatments. I
also hope that once people start talking about fat issues some of the
negative feelings about fat people and just fat in general will go away
which would certainly address the issues with medical professionals and
any care differentials that they might give. 

But as usual, I will invite anyone to answer a question:

1. What is the risk of being 100 lbs overweight? 

Is it as bad as tobacco where 50% of smokers will have smoking related
illnesses that will shorten their lives by an average of 12 years? 

The best answer I have gotten is that being 100 lbs overweight for a
woman doubles the chances of death at any given time compared to a
normal weight woman. Being 10 lbs underweight is even worse. But that
statistic has lots of flaws because it doesnt control for anything. It
counts all deaths for any reason and doesnt even mention what the risks
of death are in the first place. So it is double of WHAT? I could go on
but I wont. I have also heard that a morbidly obese woman's chances of
dying are about the same as a normal weight man's chances of dying. 

Anyways, my feelings generally are that I try not to judge other
people's choices about what they do to their body or what they eat even
when I dont agree with them. I think that Americans get really moral
about food and bodies and such and I just dont like that. I have nothing
against anyone's decision to go on a diet or to lose weight. Well, Ok,
I'll admit that whenever someone tells me they are going on a diet, I
think that it is a shame because they are almost certain to fail and
then will feel bad and I will admit that I have to bite my tongue so I
dont point that out to them. I am always happy when folks do lose weight
and keep it off if that is what they wanted to do. 

I also dont like that "health" is often an excuse used to discriminate
against fat people. That statistic I have heard that a morbidly obese
woman has the same chance of dying as a normal weight man really brought
a lot of the fat prejudice home to me. Because no one is saying that men
need to be become women for their health in the same way that people
insist that fat people become thin people. If health were really the
issue, then men should be treated the same as fat people. I dont expect
to see a special male-to-female sex change hospital to open in our area
any time soon in the way that an entire hospital in Ypsi is devoted to
bariatric surgery. 

And fwiw, I am not happy being at my weight either. But it isnt for
health reasons. It is pretty for the same reason that I am glad I am not
a Mexican illegal alien or a black person or Asian or gay. It is because
being in a class of people who are discriminated against and judged all
the time really sucks. It is stressful. 


furs
response 16 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 10:47 UTC 2007

I am not happy when I'm heavier not because of health reasons, but it's 
because I just don't feel good when I'm bigger and I am more depressed 
(though I'm not really a depressed person, I can tell a difference in 
hind-sight of how I was really kind of depressed).  I just feel 
better.  I strive to stay thinner because of health, though.   I maybe 
wrong, but it is my feeling that I am much healthier now than I was 
120lbs ago.   If I am wrong, then I don't really care, because I am 
happier this way anyway.

I do agree that fat people totally get discriminated against, because I 
have experienced it first hand.  
jadecat
response 17 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 13:16 UTC 2007

resp:15 One thing I think you've totally overlooked in Mary's post was
not that the technology was the problem in medical care- but the obese
person's body! A seriously obese person simply doesn't heal wounds as
well as someone of a smaller size. That has nothing to do with medical
technology and everything to do with being obese.

Sure there are medical technologies that could be improved- I guess-
like stronger ultrasounds so that doctors could get a clearer image
underneath all the fat layers. But the question I have is- at what cost?
Would the stronger ultrasound waves have more negative, damaging effects?

It's good that you hold your tongue when someone tells you they're going
on a diet- because adding negativity only makes the situation worse.
There's nothing as bad as telling someone you want to try something only
to have them tell you not to bother because you'll fail. You know what-
maybe they will join that 5% that actually manages to lose weight and
maintain it. It sounds like there are at least a couple people on this
board that have managed to lose weight and maintain it for years. 

I've stated many times that I want to lose weight- the reason is that
that I will be healthier. Can you currently run up a couple flights of
stairs without being out of breath? I'm currently at the heaviest I've
ever been (thanks in part to metabolism changes after I quit smoking),
although I'm no where near 300 lbs, and what I don't like is that
certain things ARE harder. Sitting on the floor and getting up is still
doable, but it used to be easier. My knees are also starting to
complain, and would cause problems if I weighed more than I do. These
things just aren't good health-wise, even if my cholesterol is at good
levels and my blood preassure is fabulous.

You mentioned the health risks with smoking- and there is one main
comonality between obesity and smoking- both are a choice.
slynne
response 18 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 13:43 UTC 2007

resp:16 WEll, I always say that if what you are doing makes you happy, 
then it doesnt matter. This is why I bite my tongue when people talk to 
me about homeopathic remedies that have no basis in science. IF it 
makes them feel better and healthier than more power to them. I mean 
what you are doing is making you feel good, Jeanne. So there is NOTHING 
wrong with that. And for all I know, for you, being thinner is 
healthier. Everyone is different and everyone needs to make their own 
choices. 

Part of the issue is that certain behaviors which are healthy cause 
people to lose weight which puts them at the lower end of their natural 
range. But is the weight loss itself that is healthy or is it the 
getting off the couch which is healthy? No one really knows for sure. 
The only study I have seen that corrects for things like activity 
levels showed that fat active people were more healthy than thin 
inactive people. 

But of course we could go around and around on this issue. Unlike the 
tobacco issue or global warming, there is no scientific concensious 
about the effects of obesity. There are studies that show it is bad, 
there are studies that show only really extreme obesity is bad, there 
are studies that show being between 1-100 lbs overweight is GOOD, etc. 
None of the media reporting on the subject seems to give meaningful 
statistics. Usually they say things like "Obesity increases risk of 
breast cancer" without mentioning what the increased risk is. 

Anyways, one of the things I find interesting is a debate going on in 
the "fat blogosphere" about how to handle the health issue. There are 
people who want to get the message out that being fat is usually not 
unhealthy (i.e. fat is a state of being, behaviors are healthy or 
unhealthy) and that you cant tell a person's health by their weight. 
And there are those people who say that the whole health issue is a way 
for anti-fat people to frame the arguement in terms of a different form 
of discrimination and moral judgement (healthy vs. unhealthy) and this 
is wrong because even if a fat person has bad behaviors and unheathly 
habits, they still deserve the same dignity and treatment as other 
people in our society. 

Anyways, one of my favorite bloggers has a post about just this issue 
which I ran across last night. She says things a lot better than I can

http://kateharding.net/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/

resp:17

Ok, I will accept that fat people dont heal quite as well as thin 
people. But in the grand scheme of things, that isnt a big risk. I will 
also accept that fat people are more likely to have certain joint 
problems later in life (although less likely to have them than 
athletes). But I imagine that surgical techniques could be developed to 
make healing go better for fat people and I also imagine that medical 
technology can help with a lot of the joint problems people are likely 
to encounter. 

I do, btw, understand the economics of it all. Such a small percentage 
of people are over a 100lbs overweight that it probably wouldnt be in 
the best interests of medicine to focus on fat people. As our 
population gets fatter though, I expect more resources will be devoted 
to such things. 

I know it is good that I bite my tongue when people tell me they are 
going on a diet. For all I know they might be one of the 5% who 
actually lose weight and keep it off. They might even be like Jeanne 
who has lost a LOT of weight and kept it off for years and years. Of 
course it is possible for people to lose weight. I wish that people 
would give me the same courtesy when I talk about my decision NOT to 
try to lose weight. It is a rational decision. I sometimes really start 
to feel some of the fat community cliches in situations like that. Like 
the one about how being fat and happy with one's body is a radical act. 
It drives people NUTS. seriously. If I say: "I like my body. It is 
healthy. I dont think I am ugly" and so on, there are always tons of 
people who go out of their way to tell me I am wrong WRONG wrong. 

Obesity is not a choice though. Obesity is a state of being. Smoking is 
a behavior. They are quite different. I kind of like thinking of 
obesity like gender. A person can change their gender if they wish. But 
there simply isnt the social pressure to do it. Why not? Because we see 
gender as a state of being and not a choice. Technically, though it IS 
a choice. Just like obesity is a choice. Actually, I might even 
theorize that it is easier to change gender than it is to change body 
mass. 

As for my personal health issues. Well, no. I can run up two flights of 
stairs. Mostly that is due to a couple of injuries though. I dont get 
winded when I climb stairs. My knees hurt too but again, that seems 
more related to injury than weight or at least I think so because my 
knees have been getting better. I might have healed more quickly if I 
were thinner I suppose. 

None of that matters. What it would take for *me* to become a thin 
person is not healthy for *me*. What you do to become thinner may or 
may not be healthy for *you* 


slynne
response 19 of 41: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 13:45 UTC 2007

Oh yeah, and btw, Anne...congratulations on quitting smoking. Most 
people who quit smoking gain weight and even though they do, they are 
still generally healthier than people who continue to smoke. 
 0-19   20-41         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss