|
Grex > Agora47 > #99: THIS IA A TEST TO SEE IF THAT FATASS SLYNNE HAS EVERYONE IN HER TWIT FILTER | |
|
| Author |
Message |
sabre
|
|
THIS IA A TEST TO SEE IF THAT FATASS SLYNNE HAS EVERYONE IN HER TWIT FILTER
| 
Oct 17 20:51 UTC 2003 |
She claimed in the partial birth abortion thread that EVERYONE is in her twit
filter. Therefore the test
|
| 52 responses total. |
janc
|
|
response 1 of 52:
|
Oct 18 00:45 UTC 2003 |
Oh good grief. Slynne is probably in the list of top ten people the least
likely to have a twit filter. Do you believe everything people tell you?
|
sabre
|
|
response 2 of 52:
|
Oct 18 19:20 UTC 2003 |
She made the claim herself.
|
remmers
|
|
response 3 of 52:
|
Oct 18 19:25 UTC 2003 |
She was kidding.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 4 of 52:
|
Oct 18 21:26 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 5 of 52:
|
Oct 18 21:28 UTC 2003 |
re #0: In Usenet parlance, I think it goes something like this: YHBT. HAND.
|
sabre
|
|
response 6 of 52:
|
Oct 18 22:30 UTC 2003 |
I'm kidding too..no one has the skin needed for my sense of humor
|
asddsa
|
|
response 7 of 52:
|
Oct 19 04:28 UTC 2003 |
re 1 janc, do you filter anyone?
|
pvn
|
|
response 8 of 52:
|
Oct 19 08:38 UTC 2003 |
Personally I never understood the reasoning behind "twit filters". If I
wanted to "twit filter" I wouldn't even log into m-net in the first
place. I would put my hands over my ears and shout out "I'm not
Listening" at the top of my voice and I would keep an Sharpie(TM) majic
marker on the dash when I drive the car to mark off those part of my
glasses where unpleasant or ignorant things are seen.
I think of it as evolution in action. Anyone stupid enough to use twit
filters will probably be stupid enough to not be able to successfully
breed (like russ?) and so the trait removes itself from the gene pool
eventually.
|
slynne
|
|
response 9 of 52:
|
Oct 19 17:14 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
slynne
|
|
response 10 of 52:
|
Oct 19 17:15 UTC 2003 |
oh, this item is so tantalizingly invisible. I can hardly stand it ;)
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 11 of 52:
|
Oct 19 17:23 UTC 2003 |
resp:8 Everyone's got an opinion. I still note that you can still
look at responses with a filter on if you want. Just takes a little
more time.
|
sabre
|
|
response 12 of 52:
|
Oct 19 21:55 UTC 2003 |
re#8
True...russ is a total idiot.
re#9 and 10
HaHa..I see you had seconds thoughts on your reponse#9
I know how to read it anyway..nothing is lost on this system...HaHa
Really I mean it. It is still readable. Just look in /h1b/bbs/censored.
WHoop whoop there it IS.
And if this item is so invisible why are you postong to it? Has all that fat
cut off circulation to your cerebral cortex?
Re#11
Oh..it's ole billy eats muff. Back on my porch..jaklulantern.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 13 of 52:
|
Oct 20 03:18 UTC 2003 |
(The file is /bbs/censored and has been depermitted, per a membership vote
some time back.)
|
janc
|
|
response 14 of 52:
|
Oct 20 03:27 UTC 2003 |
Re 7: I filter out everyone smarter than me, so that I can maintain the sense
of being the smartest person on Grex. You'll have noticed that I never
respond to md, remmers, or mcnalley.
|
sabre
|
|
response 15 of 52:
|
Oct 20 06:15 UTC 2003 |
re#13
well........that sucks
|
remmers
|
|
response 16 of 52:
|
Oct 20 16:15 UTC 2003 |
Sorry pvn, but I recently started using a twit filter. (Obviously,
you're not on it (yet).) Guess my standing with you just went down
the tubes, eh? I'll leave it to the smarter Grexers to figure out
who I'm filtering.
|
cross
|
|
response 17 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:13 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 18 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:25 UTC 2003 |
I m getting tired of sabre. His items are dumb. But, we do have
interesting spin-offs.
I don't have a twit-filter, mainly because I'm too lazy to figure out
how to use one. Also, I believe that scrolling past a response I don't
want to read works just as fine. Twit filters would come in handy for
times when a twit has been posting all over agora, and you get excited
seeing that there are 34 new responses, and you find that they're all
posted by the twit, and like you've wasted your time following his
inane postings around. Yeah, I guess a twit filter would be good in
those cases. But like I said, I'm lazy. And those instances are too
rare for me to bother.
|
md
|
|
response 19 of 52:
|
Oct 20 17:40 UTC 2003 |
Well, I have to guess that Dr. Remmers is using the twit filter on
sabre. Nothing interesting there, so why not blank it out?
There are so many fun ways a person like sabre could disrupt some poor
bbs he's decided to pick on. The method he picked -- thumping his
chest, threatening people, accusing people of being thin-skinned or
humorless when nobody laughs at his unfunny posts, explaining why
people ignore him by saying they're intellectually inferior to him,
yada yada yada -- requires no special skill, and consequently is just
dull and predictable. We've seen it lots of times before. Anybody
could do it. Janc could write a bot to do, fer chrissake. "Egotism is
the anesthetic for the pain of being stupid."
So, here's the challenge: if you wanted to come to grex or mnet and
really, really shake things up, how would you do it?
|