|
Grex > Agora46 > #8: I'm Bummed, I'm Bummed, I'm really really Bummed | |
|
| Author |
Message |
mooncat
|
|
I'm Bummed, I'm Bummed, I'm really really Bummed
| 
Jun 22 23:03 UTC 2003 |
Okay, so we have a happy item... so now, if you're bummed, down,
depressed, saddened, etc. Please, tell us why??
|
| 594 responses total. |
jazz
|
|
response 1 of 594:
|
Jun 23 05:30 UTC 2003 |
I'm saddened that my problem with my neighbors seems compltely
unresolveable.
|
mrmat
|
|
response 2 of 594:
|
Jun 23 13:30 UTC 2003 |
IBB according to news reports, Tiger Stadium may be torn down to put up
a Walmart. : (
|
jep
|
|
response 3 of 594:
|
Jun 23 14:19 UTC 2003 |
The latest notion I've heard is that Tiger Stadium may be torn down so
the land can be sold for development. There are no current specific
proposals for development, as far as I know.
I just heard about Tiger Stadium on the radio this morning, from sports
talk station WTKA (AM-1050). Detroit is currently paying the Tigers
about a half-million dollars per year to maintain Tiger Stadium. From
what I've heard, the field still looks like a ballfield (though not a
major league one). The grass is mowed, the infield is being
maintained, the outfield isn't pristine as it used to be, but it's not
bad.
Some parts of the stands are not safe any longer. If they ever opened
Tiger Stadium up for any events, as they did once for a women's
baseball game a few years ago, there'd be restrictions on where you
could sit and what parts you could go to.
The outside of the stadium looks shabby, from what I've heard from
friends. I guess it's not being painted and repaired any longer.
I'd very much like to go visit Tiger Stadium before it is torn down.
|
dcat
|
|
response 4 of 594:
|
Jun 23 15:46 UTC 2003 |
IBB it'll be at least a month before I see my girlfriend again.
|
gregb
|
|
response 5 of 594:
|
Jun 23 15:57 UTC 2003 |
IBB I don't have a girlfriend to see. B-(
Now don't you feel better, Dcat?
|
dcat
|
|
response 6 of 594:
|
Jun 23 16:02 UTC 2003 |
oh yes, much.
:-)
|
novomit
|
|
response 7 of 594:
|
Jun 23 17:39 UTC 2003 |
IBB my cat died this week.
|
slynne
|
|
response 8 of 594:
|
Jun 23 19:07 UTC 2003 |
condolences about your cat.
|
gregb
|
|
response 9 of 594:
|
Jun 23 21:12 UTC 2003 |
Sorry to hear about that,Puke...er, Vomit ;-)
|
dcat
|
|
response 10 of 594:
|
Jun 25 12:49 UTC 2003 |
Leon Uris died this weekend, of renal failure.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/25/obituaries/25URIS.html
|
beeswing
|
|
response 11 of 594:
|
Jun 25 13:16 UTC 2003 |
So sorry novomit. I miss my Harlis cat terribly.
|
tod
|
|
response 12 of 594:
|
Jun 25 15:58 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 13 of 594:
|
Jun 25 17:27 UTC 2003 |
I read a lot of his stuff, but I never finished Exodus. Have been meaning
to try it again.
|
kip
|
|
response 14 of 594:
|
Jun 25 17:33 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
kip
|
|
response 15 of 594:
|
Jun 25 17:38 UTC 2003 |
IBB there's a beautiful piece of stained glass in my office, but I can't
seem
to find a way to hang it safely in my window. Drat.
|
jep
|
|
response 16 of 594:
|
Jun 26 03:08 UTC 2003 |
I have found my ex-wife has had her live-in boyfriend watching John,
without my knowledge (until John told me of it) for the last two days
while she was not present. I have made it explicitly clear to her
that that person is not to be with John without a responsible adult's
supervision.
After I found out he was watching John yesterday, I contacted the
Friend of the Court's office to find out what I can do about it. My
case worker is a man, and was very reasonable at listening to what I
had to say. I'd expected him to berate me because my issue is not
pressing compared to others he must hear. I was wrong; he was
respectful and helpful. There wasn't anything he could do on the
spot, of course, but he was very nice.
He advised me to write him a letter, outlining my complaints about the
violations of the mediation agreement. He will then take appropriate
action.
The boyfriend was watching John again today. I had a shouting match
with my ex-wife over it over the phone a few minutes ago. There will
certainly be no doubt that I'm opposed to that person watching my
son. I managed to also point out this was a violation of the
mediation agreement regarding "right of first refusal" (today) and an
abuse of the right of first refusal (*she* was supposed to watch John
yesterday; he explicitly was *not*).
The final straw has been loaded onto the back of the camel. There
will be no more wishful thinking, that maybe the mediation agreement
is better than the alternative, even if it's only being kept to by
me. I'm going to write the letter which was suggested to me; actually
I've mostly written it. Also, I will be calling my lawyer tomorrow to
see if there's anything she should be doing.
|
keesan
|
|
response 17 of 594:
|
Jun 26 08:42 UTC 2003 |
Jim complained to the court one summer when his ex refused to let his daughter
visit for a month. The only result of this was that a few months later they
sent her a letter telling her not to do this again.
Do you want to offer to pay for daycare somewhere at times when both parents
are working?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 18 of 594:
|
Jun 26 11:48 UTC 2003 |
Best of luck with getting the situation resolved to something more stable,
John.
|
jep
|
|
response 19 of 594:
|
Jun 26 12:12 UTC 2003 |
re resp:17: I am quite willing to pay for day care, if that's what's
needed. I am already paying more than double the FoC recommended child
support, which was supposed to be compensation to her for watching John
mroe than half the time. (It's a miniscule amount of money.) I am not
willing to pay for her boyfriend to be alone with John. I'm willing to
pay quite a lot to prevent him from being with John.
I am also willing to leave work in order to watch my son for an hour,
or an afternoon, or whatever else is needed. The mediation agreement
specifies we'll give each other the "right of first refusal", which
means she has to ask me first. But she doesn't do it.
re resp:18: Thanks!
Divorce is the most disillusioning experience I can imagine.
|