|
Grex > Agora47 > #215: Should I Grex or Should I Go? The Culture Clash Item | |
|
| Author |
Message |
twenex
|
|
Should I Grex or Should I Go? The Culture Clash Item
|
Dec 9 09:04 UTC 2003 |
In a lot of US articles, newspapers, broadcasts, etc., people living
in America are constantly referred to as "Americans" (bear with me on
this)... i.e. "A lot of Americans will dump their securities... in
exchange for ...I.E.F." in the prevoius item, or the reports on 9/11
when it was constantly reported by the White House that "x number of
Americans died in...". I maintain that, unless a direct comparison is
made between one ethnicity and another, as in "40% of Brits prefferred
sausage and mash, whereas 60% of French said they preffered Frogs
legs," or "60% of English respondents said that the recent rugby world
cup win was good for British rugby/sport in general, whereas only 20%
of Scots expressed the same view", the normal world used to describe
people living in Britain as "people". (word, !world). What, if
anything, does this say about our respective cultures?
|
| 36 responses total. |
md
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
Dec 9 12:06 UTC 2003 |
1. You can't just call people living in Britain "people" unless you're
there when you say it, and not always then. "People are reluctant to
talk openly about Prince Charles's homosexuality" makes sense only if
you're saying it in the UK, and then only if everyone understands
you're referring only to British subjects. If you said it in the UK at
a gathering of Americans, somebody might give you a blank stare and
then say, "Oh, you mean people *here*." If you said it in the US,
you'd get the same blank stare and then, "Oh, you mean *you* people."
2. Americans do not, in fact, constantly refer to each other
as "Americans." They say it only if they're specifically referring to
some American thing, and not always then. "Americans love their big
cars." But also "People love their big cars."
3. That said, lets assume for sake of discussion that your false
impressions are accurate. What it says about our respective cultures
is that Americans think of themselves as citizens of the world, and are
always careful not to say "people" when what they really mean
is "American people"; whereas Brits are insular and provincial, and
refer to themselves simply as "people," as if all people loved clotted
cream, kidney pie and homosexual royalty.
|
micklpkl
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
Dec 9 14:21 UTC 2003 |
We are NOT amused.
|
twenex
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
Dec 9 16:34 UTC 2003 |
1. I was referring to the practice of people in Britain referring to
themselves as "people", vs. the apparent practice of people in the
states referring to themselves as "Americans" passim.
2. That's what I wanted to know.
3. Givenm my response to 1, the reverse of three is assumed.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
Dec 9 16:46 UTC 2003 |
I don't think 3 was referring to 0
|
twenex
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
Dec 9 16:56 UTC 2003 |
Oh, and four the record, (a) I don't like clotted cream, indeed it's
limited to the West Country (Southwest) - and I avoid clotted cream in
general. (b) Assuming yo mean "steak and kidney pie", the pudding
variety is much nicer, imo. (c) In common with most *British* people,
I'm neither besotted with royalty, nor do I believe that Prince
Charles is a homoswexual. Given his longstanding relationship with
Camilla Parker Bowles (who is, as far as anyone can tell, female),
assuming hte rumours are true he is most likely to be bisexual;
however, given that the allegations you refer to were made by someone
described by Scotland Yard as an unreliable and somewhat unhinged
source whose allegaqtions have in the past been proven demonstrably
false, it's unlikely that he's either bi- or homosexual.
(d) The fact that the current form of the Brtish state is a monarchy
does not require that I be besotted with the monarchy; (e) Nor does it
require that I believe that monarchy is a good institution, or that I
believe the holders of the office of King/Queen are necessarfily
virtuous; (f) i see no impediment in being homnosexual to being a
responsible head of state,or anything else; (g) I believe that the
current Head of state of the UK is a successful and wise one, unlike
some Presidents I could mention; (h) I would like to see the abolition
of the monarchy as sooin as possible; (i) Any person currently serv
ing or in line to serve as Queen or King should be entitled to serve
as Preisent if a republic is declared, provided they are elected as
such by the People.
Pick the bones outta that.
|
twenex
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
Dec 9 16:59 UTC 2003 |
The responses in #3 and #5 were in response tyoo #1. #4 slipped ahead
of #5.
|
flem
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
Dec 9 19:50 UTC 2003 |
I think there is something to the notion that American culture considers
"Americans" to be slightly more important than "people". How many times
have you seen a news story like this?
<huge print> 5 Americans Killed in Bomb Blast </huge print>
<small print> 492 people and 5 Americans were killed when a bomb
exploded in downtown Jerusalem today...
|
gull
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
Dec 9 19:54 UTC 2003 |
I think that's just a recognition that people relate to news stores,
especially catastrophes, based on how likely they are to affect them or
someone they know.
|
md
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Dec 9 21:41 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
md
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Dec 9 21:42 UTC 2003 |
The story would run "497 people, including 5 Americans, were killed
when a bomb exploded in downtown Jerusalem today"; or maybe "5
Americans were among the 497 people killed when a bomb exploded in
downtown Jerusalem today." I guess journalists in other countries
never do stuff like that?
|
keesan
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Dec 9 22:02 UTC 2003 |
I just read an Agatha Christie novel in which 'the four men' and 'the women'
went upstairs while Mr. Rogers (the butler) stayed downstairs to set the
table. Some characters don't even qualify as people.
|
bhoward
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Dec 10 00:22 UTC 2003 |
All media coverage focus in on news perceived to be of interest to
their readership. To watch the Nagano and Lillehammer Olympics here
in Japan, you would have thought that the only event on offer was
the ski jump and the only medal winners were Japanese.
I've never heard the phrase "the americans" or "you americans (yanks)"
so much as I have since moving abroad. Within the US, I only tend to
hear "americans" in sentences trying to contrast "americans" with some
other country or with non-americans. Most times, however, references
might be more like "we", "us", or "everyone".
I think the default assumption in the States, in fact, is that everyone
is in the same boat until the situation specifically forces people to
think in terms of nationality, "us" vs. "them". In fact, this tendency
is what often leads people from other nations to accusations that
Americans assume "everyone is an American" or "thinks like Americans do".
|
md
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Dec 10 02:26 UTC 2003 |
"us" vs. "them" -- Yes. Typical American fists-up attitude. Confirms
everything we thought. Thank you. ;-)
|
md
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Dec 10 03:09 UTC 2003 |
Brings up the side issue: when are Americans actually "Americans"?
Some politician on TV a couple of nights ago made the point that,
outside of the marginally useful areas of geography and simple
citizenship -- as in "5 Americans were killed" -- there is no such
place as "America" and no such people as "Americans." "5 Americans"
tells nothing useful about the Marine MP from Alabama, the drug
smuggler from Vermont, the Burger King sales exec from NYC, the rock
musician from Seattle and the liberal humanist from Ann Arbor, except
for their country of citizenship. There isn't even some lowest common
denominator. (Lots of different possible *lows* in each case, with
which I'll be happy to satisfy twenex's simple prejudices if he likes,
but no one common low.) We -- whoever "we" are -- can't even get
Michigan and Ohio to stop despising each other.
So, apart from being a citizen of the USA, what is it that
unquestioably makes a person an "American"?
|
md
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Dec 10 04:46 UTC 2003 |
[Spot USA quiz. What does this headline mean? "Angels Win Pitcher
Colon for $51 Million"
That's not bad, but the all-time champ is: "Sox Beat Yanks on Chapman's
Homer."]
|
other
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Dec 10 05:45 UTC 2003 |
Pottery and bowels are selling high.
|
mary
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Dec 10 11:29 UTC 2003 |
Calling yourself an "American" doesn't even narrow it
to being a citizen of the USA. It refers to the entire
continent. Someone from Peru, living in Peru, is American.
|
bhoward
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Dec 10 12:14 UTC 2003 |
Really? I would have thought they would be a "Peruano" or "citzen de
Perú", assuming their passport is that of Peru.
I've been asked many times in the countries I've visited "are you an
American?" meaning from the United States but no one ever asked me
"are you a South/North/Central American?".
Then again, I often get asked whether I'm a Canadian. Go figure.
|