|
|
| Author |
Message |
tpryan
|
|
Grind your axe?
|
Aug 19 16:14 UTC 2001 |
What instrument do you play? For your own pleasure? To
entertain a few freinds? As part of a band?
Let us know what you play. Maybe why.
|
| 19 responses total. |
happyboy
|
|
response 1 of 19:
|
Aug 19 16:16 UTC 2001 |
banjo. more or less in an oldtimey style (i.e. not bluegrass
cuz i can't get the hang of thos picks & rolls...yet)
teaching myself a little bottleneck as well
|
orinoco
|
|
response 2 of 19:
|
Aug 19 16:45 UTC 2001 |
I played fair-to-good classical piano for years, now fading towards
fair-to-poor for lack of practice. The one band I ever had a go at starting,
I played keyboards. At one point, we had a song we could make it most of the
way through.
These days, I make half-assed attempts at playing mandolin and harmonica, and
at playing folk tunes on the piano. I got sick of playing non-portable
instruments when I started travelling more and going to folk dances.
|
scott
|
|
response 3 of 19:
|
Aug 19 19:53 UTC 2001 |
I play a few different things, mostly in the garage-band style. Drums,
guitar, keyboards, harmonica, etc. But I'm pretty good at bass; these days
I'm playing in the Nick Strange Trio a couple times a month. I'm also working
up my guitar so I can front a party band by next winter.
I also spent a couple years studying shakuhachi, which is a Japanese flute.
Quite a different direction, playing a wind instrument and also playing
traditional "monk music".
|
gelinas
|
|
response 4 of 19:
|
Aug 19 22:44 UTC 2001 |
I played sousaphone in high school. Obligatory piano lessons when I was a
kid. I can still play the melody line with my right hand. I'll probably
get a piano some time in the next year, so maybe I'll try again to learn to
play it.
|
otaking
|
|
response 5 of 19:
|
Aug 21 04:29 UTC 2001 |
I played coronet in high school. I also played the recorder for a while.
Nothing in the last 10 years though.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 6 of 19:
|
Aug 22 04:13 UTC 2001 |
OK, I'll "play". :-)
I play clarinet in the Plymouth Community Band. Clarinet was my first
instrument, other than various kinds of "chord" organs and such. In high
school I switched over to French horn, which is what my first band teacher
wanted me to play to begin with. I taught myself to play piano along the way,
and I like to play ragtime. At a certain point I picked up cornet. Last year
I got a bit of comfort playing my son's trombone. My "specialty" instrument
has been the penny whistle, which I started playing 20 some years ago when
I took up an interest in Irish traditional music. I have dabbled with flute
and fife, but haven't ever nailed the emboushure. I have been composing and
arranging music for orchestra and band since high school, so I [must] know
the range and characteristics of all the instruments. My training and playing
experience have therefore been predominantly classical.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 7 of 19:
|
Apr 17 03:38 UTC 2002 |
I play classical guitar these days. I used to have good keyboard
skills, but that has fallen by the wayside somewhat, i.e., I played
piano and electric organ accompaniment for various church meetings and
sundry and now it's not called for much. I also had a little bit of
studio/MIDI training, and I'd love to work in electronica again.
For many years, I was a student of the brass instruments, and I don't
do that anymore. I played tuba for a good while, but after I finished
college, I don't want to do another band gig for a long, long time.
Oddly enough, though, I enjoyed learning trombone, and I don't really
consider myself a clowny guy. (Trust me, trombonists are clowny..)
Yes, I'm classically trained. It bleeds through to even my guitar
playing, though most guitarists I've met have come to the instrument
by a lot of improvisation; I knew classmates who were slow in playing
by classical notation or were reluctant to play that way.
I prefer classical guitar largely because its sound speaks to me the
most. It's incredibly versatile and flexible; and though I may anger
some classical pianists, you do not need to work so hard to really
coax fine, beautiful sound. (You are removed from the strings
themselves on the piano.. you have to get them from depressing the
keys, and so you are often limited to the keys, unless you employ
unorthodox methods.) On the other hand, while piano is easy to get
started with, guitar can be really difficult to master all the way
through.
Not everything should be transcribed to guitar-- I understand Segovia
was heavily criticized when he began transcribing J.S. Bach's works--
but I seem to enjoy much more of the body of work. There are some
things transcribed to piano that I think are just horrid, because too
many folks forget it is a *percussive* instrument, and excels when it
is treated as such. The guitar is quiet, relaxing, very deep in its
layers of sonic reverbaration (sp?) for me, and I am willing to
practice much more diligently for it than I have any other
instrument. I was very sad to end my formal studies at college with
my second and last concert with the ensemble. My classmates accepted
me despite my green stumblings, and it didn't feel like the typical
concert I was used to giving with other groups. Here I was with
friends, sharing of my *true self* to the audience. Regrettably, we
had some unappreciative audiences (even music students can be rude,
but we had to make concerts a bit long to fit everyone in-- we were
the addendenum of the department), but it was worth every moment.
|
coyote
|
|
response 8 of 19:
|
Apr 21 19:53 UTC 2002 |
My primary instrument is the French horn, which I started playing my first
year of high school because I was tired of the trumpet. It gradually and
stealthily became a bigger and bigger part of my life and now I'm finishing
up my first year of horn performance studies at the University of Michigan
(got my first jury tomorrow!), which is interesting to think about because
just a few years ago I had absolutely no intention of attending music
school. I love ensemble playing and the people I get to meet as a horn
player, so I'm really happy that I picked it up.
I also play piano, which up until last year was my primary instrument. I
don't remember when I started playing, apparently when I was 3 years old or
so when I'd sit down at the piano after my older sister was done practicing
and copy by ear what she was working on. Cool as that may sound, I'm
certainly nothing spectacular as a pianist and decided that going to music
school on piano was not really an option. I love the instrument, though, and
continue to take lessons as frequently as I can fit them into my schedule,
and I still play regularly.
I've dabbled in many other instruments, as well: viola and oboe most
seriously. I couldn't keep all of them up and still be in school, so I
narrowed it down to just horn and piano. I'm glad I've had the firsthand
exposure to those other instruments, though, because it's really helped me
with writing music. I'd still like to pick up some other instruments someday,
too, maybe harp, cello (I love string quartets!), or organ, but I don't have
time right now.
|
dbratman
|
|
response 9 of 19:
|
Apr 22 20:49 UTC 2002 |
Captain Jack wrote:
>There are some things transcribed to piano that I think are just
>horrid, because too many folks forget it is a *percussive* instrument,
>and excels when it is treated as such.
It does indeed; but unless you're prepared to write off Frederic Chopin
and Erik Satie, to name two, as totally deluded, it also does pretty
well in the quiet and contemplative department.
>The guitar is quiet, relaxing,
And can also be pretty exciting and even percussive (snapping of the
strings, slapping the soundboard, etc.)
Since we're naming instruments, mine is the phonograph. Highly
versatile, easy to learn, and plays more music with less effort than
any other. I took to it because my desire to listen to music far
outweighed any interest, or ability, to play it.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 10 of 19:
|
Apr 23 05:37 UTC 2002 |
You misunderstand me-- the mallet instruments (vibraphone, xylophone,
marimba, bells) are percussive instruments, too. These are distinctly
put in the percussive department and many tunes written for them are
quiet and contemplative.
As for the guitar, I am distinctly biased to the classical guitar, and
I'll admit I forgot about the flamenco and electric versions. As you
know, flamenco styles are very rhythmic, providing an accompaniment
for the dancer. The rhythm is obsessively emphasized; it is said one
must master it before attempting solo riffs. Much of the percussive
styles have roots in the flamenco tradition.
The electric guitar is different, of course; distortion is considered
a part of the modern sound and can be modified. It's a whole 'nother
ball of wax..
|
dbratman
|
|
response 11 of 19:
|
Apr 24 16:18 UTC 2002 |
Compare the piano music of Chopin with that of Prokofiev. Prokofiev
famously showed up and said that the piano was a percussive instrument,
so he was by gum going to treat it as one. And he certainly did.
Now, after that, listen to a Chopin Nocturne. Is that not entirely as
non-percussive as piano music can get? Prokofiev was right, but he
wasn't _exclusively_ right.
Then there's the harpsichord, which plays a lot of the same music
(especially 18th century) but is not percussive.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 12 of 19:
|
Apr 25 07:19 UTC 2002 |
I'll have to dig up some Chopin and some Prokofiev sometime. Of
course, the piano is somewhat of a hybrid instrument, and therefore,
it doesn't have to sound like its other percussive cousins. There
are no surviving instruments like the piano that are percussive, too.
There was the clavichord, which hammered metal bars, but it is not
used today except in period music.
Well, no, and that's because the harpischord *plucks* the strings.
It's a very different sound. The harpischord also uses justified
intonation rather than tempered, I believe; at least to the extent
that it must be tuned specifically to the key you are playing in.
You've got to know how to tune a harpischord before you play one
extensively-- or such is my understanding.
I wish I could remember what instrument bridged the gap soundwise
between the archlute and the harpischord. I saw it on a site
somewhere, and I can't remember where I found it.
The celesta has also died with the times (it's a glassblown instrument
that spins on a horizontal wheel, and you play it with moistened
fingers), but I wonder-- what instrument classification does it fall
under?
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 13 of 19:
|
Apr 25 07:19 UTC 2002 |
View hidden response.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 14 of 19:
|
Apr 25 15:38 UTC 2002 |
The harpsichord has been played in tempered intonation since (and before)
Bach's "Well Tempered Clavier". (A clavier is any keyboard instrument.)
I don't know what "hammered metal bars" are, but the clavichord is a
stringed instrument, except the strings are struck from the side by metal
bars (tangents) raised by the keys.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 15 of 19:
|
Apr 25 17:40 UTC 2002 |
Re #11: Only if by "percussive" you mean "loud and bangy." As Lumen's
pointed out, there's some nice quiet contemplative percussion music out there.
It still sounds like percussion; nobody would mistake it for a brass quintet
or a pipe organ. And good piano music -- even Chopin -- is the same way.
Uhm, what am I trying to say here?
In music for strings or winds, you can get by with a nice sustained melody
and good tone color and intonation. On a piano, that's not enough -- the
tuning's fixed, there's not much sustain, and the tone color's pretty
constant. Piano music, as a rule, relies more on rhythm and figuration than
wind or string music -- and you can't tell me that's not true of Chopin and
Prokofiev both.
|