|
Grex > Agora47 > #107: Give me one good reason why liberals aren't idiots. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
sabre
|
|
Give me one good reason why liberals aren't idiots.
| 
Oct 21 02:49 UTC 2003 |
Just one
|
| 58 responses total. |
scott
|
|
response 1 of 58:
|
Oct 21 03:10 UTC 2003 |
1. sabre is not a liberal.
|
md
|
|
response 2 of 58:
|
Oct 21 03:32 UTC 2003 |
No, that proves only that all idiots aren't liberals.
But see, *I* think sabre really is a liberal and just wants to prove he
can get Grexers' panties in a bunch by being insulting, abusive and
right-wing sounding. (I'd've thought that's something you could train
a dog to do, but I guess it isn't so easy after all. It freakin'
impossible for "sabre," at any rate.) Anyway, if my theory is right,
then yes, there's at least one instance of a liberal idiot.
Which side has more idiots, liberals or conservatives?
|
dah
|
|
response 3 of 58:
|
Oct 21 03:53 UTC 2003 |
Well, my theory about sabre, and I AM Northrop Fucking Frye, is that
he's in college as evidenced by his big technical words but he's still
a beer drinker.
|
russ
|
|
response 4 of 58:
|
Oct 21 04:20 UTC 2003 |
Most liberals have to be smarter than sabre, because they aren't dumb
enough to post shit like this. This makes them, if not non-idiots,
at least a higher grade of retard.
|
kenscann
|
|
response 5 of 58:
|
Oct 21 09:20 UTC 2003 |
i get the impression he's just trying to stir shit up a bit!...bored probably
|
jp2
|
|
response 6 of 58:
|
Oct 21 10:05 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
md
|
|
response 7 of 58:
|
Oct 21 12:05 UTC 2003 |
That's what I said in response #2, stupid.
|
remmers
|
|
response 8 of 58:
|
Oct 21 12:06 UTC 2003 |
Define "idiot".
|
md
|
|
response 9 of 58:
|
Oct 21 12:21 UTC 2003 |
[Appearing in a sabre item, that's actually very funny.]
|
jp2
|
|
response 10 of 58:
|
Oct 21 12:38 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
janc
|
|
response 11 of 58:
|
Oct 21 13:53 UTC 2003 |
I think it would help if you could point out a conservative who is not
an idiot, just so we could have an idea of what sort of person it is
that you have in mind.
You can look around any shopping mall and find hundreds of people with
usuable IQs, many of them liberals. But finding a person that couldn't
be called an idiot by a rude child is a bit harder.
If you're going to define everyone as an idiot, then you've just removed
the concept from the domain of things worth talking about. It's a
classification that fails to classify anyone, and is pure verbal noise.
If you're going to accept a more normal definition of the term, then
finding a liberal that is not a idiot is pretty easy. They constitute
about half the population of America, and better than half the
population of Grex.
|
janc
|
|
response 12 of 58:
|
Oct 21 14:00 UTC 2003 |
jhhgggggggggggggggggggggggggb
hhhoOoooolllooooooooooooooooo, hhffmou9iigsa bfdsa25t htg55":
?Pj7hh6h3333333333333333333444343
jdkelkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk{piooooo
//';;.;;..,jjjjjjjjjjj77ew315hykkn
n nmmk,m
f ddd
xzzzzaxzaaaaaaaaaaaazoooooooooooofoooooovvcccfgvhnju8oooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooo;;e
'
b vb m ,m m m,mm a a a ,n
|
janc
|
|
response 13 of 58:
|
Oct 21 14:03 UTC 2003 |
Kendra typed' th'at''';
she is helping me type now too. She's not an idiot, but her political
opinions are a little unformed. However, she says "thank you" when you
wipe her nose, which is more than I can say for a lot of people.
|
gull
|
|
response 14 of 58:
|
Oct 21 15:01 UTC 2003 |
I tend to assume idiots are pretty evenly distributed through the
population. That would mean most of them are probably "swing voters".
|
cross
|
|
response 15 of 58:
|
Oct 21 15:11 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|