You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-11   12-36   37-61   62-86   87-111   112-136   137-161   162-186   187-211 
 212-236   237-261   262-286   287-299       
 
Author Message
mynxcat
Question about BOD bylaw Mark Unseen   Aug 26 03:59 UTC 2002

This item has been erased.

299 responses total.
other
response 1 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 04:03 UTC 2002

It has not.
mynxcat
response 2 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 04:35 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 3 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 04:39 UTC 2002

Yup.  Unless that one has quite a travel budget.
janc
response 4 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 04:47 UTC 2002

There has certainly been discussion about amending it.  M-Net manages to have
non-local board members.
jp2
response 5 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 04:52 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

twinkie
response 6 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 05:00 UTC 2002

And we *still* can't manage to have monthly meetings.

mynxcat
response 7 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 05:02 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

tod
response 8 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 05:08 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 9 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 05:09 UTC 2002

Right.  Unless you agreed to come for the meetings.

I don't know about "fair"; it's about as fair as requiring US citizenship to
vote for our President.
gelinas
response 10 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 05:09 UTC 2002

Someone ran on a similar platform last year, BTW.
rcurl
response 11 of 299: Mark Unseen   Aug 26 05:53 UTC 2002

Grex is a Michigan corporation. That doesn't exclude non-residents from
being a board member, but they should still familiarize themselves with
Michigan non-profit corporate law. In any case, Michigan law permits board
meetings via "communications equipment" without requiring anything in the
bylaws to permit this. (450.2521) That law also states "participation in a
meeting pursuant to this subsection constitutes presence in person at the
meeting." Therefore, by legal definition, an electronic meeting IS
"face-to-face".

(The law, however, seems not to be updated to the computer age: it does
say "...by means of which all persons...can hear each other". That is
possible, of course, with conversion of text to speech, but I think with
unanimous consent, it would be acceptable to do it just on-line. I
certainly would not hesitate to agree to do so.)

 0-11   12-36   37-61   62-86   87-111   112-136   137-161   162-186   187-211 
 212-236   237-261   262-286   287-299       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss