|
|
| Author |
Message |
jp2
|
|
Destroy item 39
| 
Jan 11 16:59 UTC 2004 |
This item has been erased.
|
| 138 responses total. |
kip
|
|
response 1 of 138:
|
Jan 11 17:15 UTC 2004 |
I'd like to encourage members to vote no on this proposal. I think item 39
generated a discussion that was important and should be kept for later review.
|
willcome
|
|
response 2 of 138:
|
Jan 11 17:33 UTC 2004 |
I vote yes.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 3 of 138:
|
Jan 11 18:20 UTC 2004 |
Since it has become clear that the expectation of the grex community is that
item authors can NOT delete other people's commments in their items, I hope
this proposal is withdrawn or fails. Its passage *would* set a precedent I,
at least, would prefere were not set.
|
naftee
|
|
response 4 of 138:
|
Jan 11 20:49 UTC 2004 |
I vote ?
|
jp2
|
|
response 5 of 138:
|
Jan 11 22:38 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
kip
|
|
response 6 of 138:
|
Jan 12 01:17 UTC 2004 |
I'm sorry Jamie, I'll learn to speak more clearly than I did in item 68,
response 241.
I, as a member of staff, am opposed to removing item 39.
Valerie was not "The staff", she was one of several staff members.
|
janc
|
|
response 7 of 138:
|
Jan 12 02:31 UTC 2004 |
If M-Net's treasurer embezzles the full contents of M-Net's bank account
and loses it in a slot machine, would you then declare that people
shouldn't give money to M-Net because it is the demonstrated policy of
M-net to gamble away it's funds?
|
jp2
|
|
response 8 of 138:
|
Jan 12 02:41 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 9 of 138:
|
Jan 12 02:45 UTC 2004 |
Good God.
|
kip
|
|
response 10 of 138:
|
Jan 12 05:21 UTC 2004 |
Ah Jamie, I'm quickly learning why you're so loved here for your understanding
of the English language.
When someone is accused of a crime and undergoes a trial, do we assume that
the law broken is suddenly broken and null for all until the trial is done?
No.
|