krj
|
|
The Fourth Napster Item
|
Feb 7 04:53 UTC 2001 |
Thomas Middelhoff, the CEO of the media conglomerate Bertelmann, picked a
very public platform to deliver the news about Napster. At the
World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Middelhoff announced that
Napster would begin charging its users by July. Middelhoff further
announced that a digital rights management system would become part
of the Napster experience.
The Napster corporation seemed somewhat confused by this announcement,
and at first I chalked it up a clueless executive sounding off
on the world stage. I didn't see how digital rights management was
going to be incorporated into the Napster file sharing model; maybe
there was some idea that they would put some sort of wrapper around the
MP3 file as it was delivered to your computer?
Then it struck me: first, Bertelsmann thinks that the $50 million
it loaned Napster last fall gives it control. Second, Bertelsmann
wants Napster's brand name and its 30-50 million users, but
file sharing does not figure into Bertelsmann's plans.
Bertelsmann's Napster will give users songs from central
servers, not from everybody's hard disks.
Essentially, Bertelsmann wants to take their failed BMG music
download system, spiff it up a bit, and call it Napster.
I'm skeptical that this will go very far with the existing
Napster user base.
I found confirmation of Bertelsmann's view in a recent issue
of "Entertainment Weekly," in an article on the availability of
racist hate songs through Napster. In that article, Bertelsmann
senior VP Frank Sarfeld talks about "in the future, when
Bertelsmann and Napster, in a new musiness model, will limit
distribution to 'licensed music from major record labels.'"
((No indie labels on Napster? Hmm, I wonder if there's grounds for
antitrust action here.))
Bertelsmann hasn't gotten any of the other major labels to sign up
for a Bertelsmann-controlled Napster.
|