You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-83       
 
Author Message
ryan1
*NEW* (and better?) Proposal for Unregistered BBS Reading Mark Unseen   Mar 11 02:52 UTC 1997

Here's my shot at a proposal to satisfy everyone:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
     There is to be exactly one conference which is open for read-only 
access by unregistered users.  Unregistered users are people who do not 
have an account on Grex.  This one particular conference can be readable 
via backtalk.

     This single conference is meant to give unregistered users a small 
taste of what Grex is like.  Items which have the potentional to catch 
the interest of unregistered users are to be linked to this specific 
conference.  Before an item is linked, the person who entered the item 
must concur to the linkage.  If the user who entered the item no longer 
has an account on Grex, then the item may be linked without the 
agreement of the user.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
83 responses total.
dpc
response 1 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 04:18 UTC 1997

Well, I like it.
robh
response 2 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 06:49 UTC 1997

Sounds decent.
aruba
response 3 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 08:07 UTC 1997

Yes, I like this better than the other compromises.
tsty
response 4 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 10:22 UTC 1997

you garnered another agreement from me.... fine idea.
babozita
response 5 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 13:33 UTC 1997

*hops up and down and screams*
When this was first suggested, everyone ignored it.
*points to 67*
And now this makes motion #4 on the issue.
  
While I like #0 the best of all current proposals, this entire issue is
getting UTTERLY ridiculousnad fragmented.
 
Maybe I'lll just forget co-op again... *sigh* NowI'm remember ing why I left
in the first place. 
nsiddall
response 6 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 16:16 UTC 1997

Several people have suggested this along the way, and it seems to me a fine
way of approaching the thing.  How about waiting 'til everyone has got voting
and arguing out of their systems and calmed down, and then just *doing* this
(if anyone cares enough to implement it)?  This doesn't require a lot of
policy-making.  Just announce it, and make sure everyone participating in the
conference understands.

Incidentally, my guess is that this would turn out to be a better way to
"market" Grex.  If everything is completely accessible, we'd probably get
innocent websurfers stumbling into the Coop conference, and then signing off
in disgust.  This way we put our best stuff out there.  Maybe we should
have a new conference for the purpose--the "Grex World Open Conference", say.
steve
response 7 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 18:14 UTC 1997

   I really, really, really don't see what all this fuss is about.  We
*have* anonymous reading of conferences already: it's called "Grex".

   I am dumbfounded at how much effort is going on into the debate
over essentially which TCP/IP 'port' one can read conference data
from!  This low-level technical tidbit is what all this boils down
to: do we allow people to telnet in, completely unverified, and read
conferences to their hearts content, not really knowing what they're
doing (PicoSpan does not keep logs of user activity), or let people
come in through the web interface which is equally anonymous, except
that the hypertext transport deamon (httpd) logs what pages (which
are items/responses)?

   In the end, it's all the same thing!

   I really wish people would take the time to understand just the
top level of how the net works.  *Not* studying the low-level crud
which only a nerd loves, but just how things work, in general.

   I am amazed.
mary
response 8 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 19:37 UTC 1997

Would individual posters not be given a say in whether their
responses would be readable by the unregistered users?  I thought
this was of grave concern to those who feared losing control over
who read their stuff?
cmcgee
response 9 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 20:59 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

cmcgee
response 10 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 21:13 UTC 1997

Ok, got that out of my system. On a more rational plane, Grex currently
allows A. Nonny (mouse) to read any conference by joining as an observer. 
This leaves no record of the person being a participant. In fact, we would
have *more* information about a Web-based unregistered user, than we do
now for someone with a Grex login who uses the observe mode, especially if
they did not give accurate information when they created their account. 

This whole set of proposals is an attempt to allow people who feel more
secure with A. Nonny (mouse) reading from telnet with no record, to
continue to feel secure.  There is really no security, but we are
attempting, nonetheless, to let people continue to feel that there is.
(Isn't a sense of community wonderful <g>).  

richard
response 11 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 21:19 UTC 1997

the question iof individual posters is a good one...I think this cant work
unless every conf that chooses to be closed make that clear.  That is, each
fw should put on the entrace screen:  "Thisis a closed conf...no unregistered
reading of this conf is allowed and no linking to or from this conf is
allowed..ever"

This is the onlyremotely fair way to implement this...other wise it isnt fair
to anyone who posts not knowing this is a censored conf.
ryan1
response 12 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 22:08 UTC 1997

Well, in my opinion, an "unregistered" user who just stops by 
http://www.cyberspace.org and decides to browse through a few 
conferences would be bored to death, and could go away because of the 
large amount of information that isn't any immediate use to the user.  
One single conference could display the best of each conference, while 
leaving the junk out.

When a company advertises a product, they tell about the good things; 
not the bad aspects or flaws in the product.
mta
response 13 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 05:17 UTC 1997

Grex?  Have flaws???  Never!  <bg>
valerie
response 14 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 06:55 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 15 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 13:53 UTC 1997

Indeed. That's the main reason why I oppose this proposal. I
don't mind having a "best of Grex" conference -- we sort of
already have one, the Intro conference -- but I see no good
reason to limit read-only unregistered access to just this one
conference, as Ryan's proposal would require.
babozita
response 16 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 15:39 UTC 1997

#7> Steve, I understand the fuss. If you don't by now, you won't.
it's that simple... *sigh*
  
"It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up,
 but why should I give up when it all seems so stupid?" -- Depeche Mode
aruba
response 17 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 16:09 UTC 1997

I suspect we may get a lot of conferencers joining Grex because they saw the
sex conference (or whatever we call it now) on some web page.  Grex may get
a reputation as a place to talk dirty, if we allow all conferences to be
accessible from web pages.  Maybe that's worth the risk, I don't know.
remmers
response 18 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 16:21 UTC 1997

I'm not too worried about that. The sex conference has been just
as open to all users with login id's as every other conference,
for something like five years now, and we haven't seen a
spillover effect into other conferences. I think that a user who
discovers grex on the web and who wants to talk about sex will
go to the sex conference to do so, not some arbitrary other
conference like cooking or garage.
richard
response 19 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 16:58 UTC 1997

aruba, since the fw of thesex conf is selena, I think it is likely that that
will be one of the closedconfs, so yourpoint is moot, though I dont think it
wouldbe a problem

That is if cmcgee's motion passes ...if Mary's passes and hers doesnt, then
yourp oint is valid enough.
ryan1
response 20 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 20:34 UTC 1997

I'd just like to point out one thing.

STeve Andre' keeps claiming that "unregistered" users who were to use 
backtalk to read the conferences instead of creating an account are 
logged more than if they were to create an account.  But, if I recall 
correctly, the httpd logs are not world-readable.

So, is unregistered reading logged?  Yes
Can non-rootly people view them?     No
dang
response 21 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 23:09 UTC 1997

I don't know.  I can read the httpd.log file, and I'm not root (at the moment)
or in the deamon group.  Did you try reading it?  
scg
response 22 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 23:41 UTC 1997

The web server logs are currently readable only to staff.  I'm not sure fi
there's a good reason for that or not.
babozita
response 23 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 14:12 UTC 1997

#18> Type j sex John. G'ahead. Do it. No-one from the Web will be reading
those nice old posts.
valerie
response 24 of 83: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 17:14 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-83       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss