|
Grex > Coop9 > #112: Grex's 501(c)3 Application |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
janc
|
|
Grex's 501(c)3 Application
|
Jul 2 01:45 UTC 1997 |
This goal of this item is to work on preparing an application for 501(c)3
status for Grex.
There was a concensus a few months ago that we did, in fact, want to apply
for 501(c)3 status, which would allow people who donate money to Grex to
write it off of their taxes. If anyone wants to discuss not going for
501(c)3, please start a new item for that discussion. I want to use this
item for the mechanics of getting the application filled out in a way that
is (1) likely to get approved, and (2) accurately describes what Grex really
is and really wants to be, so that we don't corner ourselves into any mission
that we aren't actually committed to already.
To get 501(c)3 status, we need to fill out IRS form 1023, and get it approved.
I understand 501(c)3 status is very often denied on the first try and has to
be appealed. The form is nine pages long, plus various attachments are
required. If anyone wants the form and instructions, they can be downloaded
from the IRS's web page.
My proposal is that we first work on-line to discuss the general strategy we
want to take, and work out the narrative parts, and then a group consisting
of at least me (I've volunteered to coordinate this project) and Mark Conger
(we need lots of financial information) plus whoever else wants to help get
together to work out the final application. The final form would be approved
by the board before being submitted.
The Form 1023 instructions include a list of "activity codes" that are
eligable for 501(c)3 status. You are supposed to choose up to three that
best describe your organization's tax-exempt purposes and list them in order
of importance. I've chosen the two marked with "#1" and "#2" in the vastly
reduced list below (I'm just including enough to give a sense of the list):
Religious Activities.
003 Religious order
007 Evangelism
Schools, Colleges, and Related Activites.
030 School, College, Trade School, etc.
032 Nursury School
045 Student Operated Business
Cultural, Historical or Other Educational Activities
060 Museum, zoo, planetarium, etc.
061 Library
065 Fair
088 Community Theatrical Group
092 Literary Activities
093 Cultural Exchange with foreign countries
Other Instructional and Training Activities" section)
120 Publishing Activites
121 Radio or television broadcasting
122 Producing films
#1 123 Discussion groups, forums, panels, lectures, etc.
124 Study and research (nonscientific)
125 Giving information or opinion (see Advocacy)
126 Apprentice Training
149 Other instruction and training
Health Services and Related Areas
150 Hospital
166 Mental health care
Scientific Research Activities
180 Contract or sponsored research for industry
181 Scientific research for government
Business and Professional Organizations
207 Industry trade shows
208 Convention displays
213 Tourist Bureau
Farming and Related Activites
233 Horticultural Group
237 Breeders association
Mutual Organizations
251 Credit Union
Employee or Membership Benefit Organizations
260 Fraternal beneficiary society, order or association
269 Vacation benefits
Sports, Athletic, Recreational and Social Activities
280 Country club
281 Hobby club
282 Dinner club
283 Variety club
285 Women's club
296 Community center
297 Community recreational facilities (park, playground, etc)
319 Other social activities
Youth Activities
320 Boy Schouts, Girl Scouts, etc.
325 Camp
328 Combat juvenile delinquency
349 Other youth organization or activities
Conservation, Environmental and Beautification Activites
350 Preservation of natural resources
356 Garden club
Housing activities
380 Low-income housing
Inner City or Community Activities
400 Area development, redevelopment, or renewal
404 Community promotion
406 Crime prevention
407 Volunteer fireman's organization or auxiliary
408 Community service organization
429 Other inner city or community benefit activities
Civil Rights Activities
430 Defense of human and civil rights
431 Elimination of prejudice and descrimination (race, religion, sex,
national origin, etc).
432 Lessen neighborhood tensions
Litigation and Political Activities
460 Public interest litigation activities
463 Providing bail
Legislative and Political Activities
480 Propose, support, or oppose legislation
481 Voter information on issues of candidates
482 Voter education (mechanics of registering, voting etc).
483 Support, oppose, or rate political candidates
484 Provide facilities or services for political campaign activities.
Advocacy -- attempt to influence public opinion concerning:
510 Firearm control
514 Government spending
515 Taxes or tax exemption
516 Separation of church and state
520 Pacifism or peace
529 Ecology or conservation
535 Racial integration
539 Prohibition of erotica
543 Legalized abortion
559 Other matters
Other Activities Directed to Individuals
#2 560 Supplying money, goods, or services to the poor
561 Gifts or gants to individuals (other than scholarships)
563 Marriage conseling
564 Family planning
566 Job training, counseling, or assistance
568 Vocational counseling
569 Referral service (social agencies)
572 Rehabilitating convicts or ex-convicts
574 Day care center
575 Services of the aged
Activities Directed to other organizations
600 Community Chest, United Way, etc.
601 Booster club
602 Gifts, grants, loans to organizations
603 Nonfinacial services or facilities to other organizations
Other Purposes or Activites
900 Cemetary or burial activities
908 Patriotic activities
913 Prevention of cruelty to animals
927 Fundraising
I think #1 does an OK job of describing the educational side of our mission,
creating forums for public discussion. It's comforting that it is in the
same catagory with public broadcasting. #2 captues the charitable, "giving
away internet service to people who might not otherwise be able to afford it"
part of our mission. Neither is an exact fit, but we can't hope for an
exact fit in any list. We aren't that normal.
|
| 138 responses total. |
janc
|
|
response 1 of 138:
|
Jul 2 01:59 UTC 1997 |
We are required to include copies of our articles of incorporation and bylaws
with the application. I think our bylaws are fine. They say things like
"The Corporation is organized for such charitable and educational purposes
as may qualify it for exemption from the federal income tax under Section
501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [...]. More specifically, such
purposes include, but are not limited to, the advancement of public education
and scientific endeavor through interaction with computers, and humans via
computers, using computer conferencing. Further purposes include the exchange
of scientific and technical information about the various aspects of computer
science, such as operating systems, computer networks, and computer
programming."
That's a little weird, but the explicit statement that Grex is limited to
doing things allowed under 501(c)3 law is what the IRS wants to see in our
articles of incorporation. (By the way, if there are still people who thing
Grex shouldn't be 501(c)3 around, article 6, section 3 of our articles of
incorporation already binds us to obey the 501(c)3 rules and has since Grex's
founding).
I'm less satisfied with the bylaws. The PREAMBLE says:
It is the objective of this organization to provided an
open-access computer conferencing system for the education,
intellectual enrichment, and entertainment of its users through
the peaceable interchange of information and ideas. To this end,
we establish these bylaws for the governance of the
organization.
I'd prefer to see at least a nod to Grex's charitable mission in that.
Somethign about provide free or low-cost services. Luckily, bylaws are easily
changed.
|
janc
|
|
response 2 of 138:
|
Jul 2 01:59 UTC 1997 |
More notes on this later. Time to eat.
|
janc
|
|
response 3 of 138:
|
Jul 2 02:53 UTC 1997 |
Couple notes. I think that we should consider doing a pass through Grex's
bylaws to make various changes that will have no particular effect on how Grex
is run. I've heard lots of people complain about wording, and I think the
statement of purpose could more completely reflect our goals. It would be
nice to be able to bundle up a lot of these cosmetic and hopefully
non-controversial changes and pass them in one vote. I don't think this is
necessary for the 501(c)3 project, but it would be nice.
Also, I am under the impression that various other organizations had offered
or even given Grex copies of their 501(c)3 applications for us to use as a
partial template. I, however, haven't seen any, and I would kind of like to.
If anyone knows where we can get something along those lines, I would find
it helpful.
|
janc
|
|
response 4 of 138:
|
Jul 2 02:58 UTC 1997 |
The big narrative chunk of the application starts on page two of the form.
It says:
Part II Activities and Operational Information
1. Provide a detailed narrative description of all the activities of the
organization--past, present, and planned. DO NOT MERELY REFER TO OR
REPEAT THE LANGUAGE IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENT. List each activity
separately in the order of importance based on the relative time and
other resources devoted to the activity. Indicate the percentage of
time for each activity. Each description should include, as a
minimum, the following (a) a detailed description of the activity
including its purpose and how each activity furthers your exempt
purpose; (b) when the activity was or will be initiated; and (c) where
and by whome the activity will be conducted.
|
janc
|
|
response 5 of 138:
|
Jul 2 03:23 UTC 1997 |
Here is a first draft of a narrative describing our activities. I think it
still needs a lot of work, including being more explicit about hitting the
points they asked for in the question above. I need to be clearer about
planned activities, if only by saying we plan to stay on much the same course.
I think the organization can be tightened up a bit too.
My goal is to give a fairly complete description of what we do. I don't want
to try to hide things like the largely social nature of much of what goes on
here, because I want to get into the situation M-Net found itself in where
lots of people were trying to bend Arbornet to fit their reading of it's
501(c)3 status. I want to get approval for Grex as it is, and as we want it
to be, warts and all.
Which is not to say I won't try to put the best possible light on everything.
I honestly think that warts and all, Grex is very well qualified for 501(c)3
status. This is an amazingly good organization from a public service stand
point.
OK, here's my draft:
=============================================================================
The primary activity of Cyberspace Communications, occupying about 95% of
our organization's time, is the operation of a public access computer system
called "Grex." This computer system is currently housed in a rented room at
416 West Huron in Ann Arbor and has been in continuous operation since June
of 1991. It is operated by a volunteer staff under the direction of the
Cyberspace Communications board of directors and currently has about 15,000
registered users. Grex provides a wide range of services to the community
that further the mission of Cyberspace Communications:
(1) We maintain a bank of dial-in modem lines in Ann Arbor (at 313-761-3000)
and an Internet connection (at grex.cyberspace.org).
This allows people in the Ann Arbor area to easily access our service
(through the dial-in lines), but also allows access by people all over
the world (through the Internet connection). "Obsolete" computers and
modems readily available for less than $45 are more than adequate to use
all of Grex's dial-in services.
(2) A simple registration process enables users coming in from either the
dial-in lines or the Internet to create Grex accounts for themselves.
This process is designed to be as barrier-free as possible, encouraging
the widest possible range of users to access our system. Users are not
required to pay any fees, nor are they required to give any information
about themselves. Accounts are created immediately and there is no delay
in gaining access.
This registration process is the key to our charitable mission. It
enables a wide variety of people who could not otherwise afford Internet
services to use our system. We serve many poor people as well as other
users who could not justify paying commercial rates for services they
only use occasionally. People from all over the world connect over the
Internet to access services that are prohibitively expensive or completely
unavailable in their own countries.
Our open registration policy also supports our educational mission. Our
free and anonymous access means we have a very large population of young
users, as well as many older users who want to experiment with the
Internet without paying to do so.
(3) We produce a variety of instructional materials, both printed and
electronic, designed to help people learn to use Grex. We answer hundreds
of user questions a week through E-mail and our on-line live help
facility.
Educating users in the use of Grex is an necessary component of both our
educational and charitable mission.
(4) Grex hosts electronic conferences on more than 100 topics, all of which
are open to all of our users. Typical conference topics include music,
the arts, writing, consumer information, housing, finance, small business,
philosophy, living with disabilities, men's and women's issues, parenting,
pets, computers hardware and software, nature, cyberpunk, and role playing
games. There are also rather non-topical "creative" conferences, and a
general discussion area called "agora". All Cyberspace Communications
policies are discussed and developed in a public conference called "coop".
These discussion forums are the key to our educational mission. The only
direct teaching done by Cyberspace Communications is focused on how to
use the system. Our broader educational mission is served by providing
and maintaining these discussion forums where the content is entirely
generated by the users. The wide range of users attracted by our open
access policy ensures a wide range of knowledge and opinion. On-line
forums are very effective in drawing people with diverse backgrounds
into common discussions.
Cyberspace Communications does not attempt to limit discussion to
"serious" topics. We believe that simply socializing on line can
greatly aid the personal development of many of our young users. On-line
forums can be a very non-threatening environment in which to learn social
skills, up to and including those needed to democratically run a community
(5) Grex provides a range of basic Internet services, allowing all users to
send and receive E-mail, surf the web, post their own web pages, and
retrieve files off the Internet. In all cases, our service is of much
lower quality than commercial servers, using older, non-graphical user
interfaces and a rather slow Internet connection, but it is nevertheless
usable.
Providing these services for free is an important part of our charitable
mission, and helping people learn their use is an important part of our
educational mission.
(6) As a volunteer operation, Cyberspace Communication constantly works to
recruit and train new people to help run Grex. For several people,
experience running Grex has been a vital step in launching or advancing
careers in computing.
(7) Out of necessity, Grex's staff must be very active in policing the system,
ensuring that hostile users do not abuse our service to the detriment of
our other users or of other systems on the Internet. However, we
recognize that many of the "problem" users are, in fact, young people who
need guidance to become good citizens of the net, so we strive to respond
to problems in an educational rather than punitive manner. We believe
we have had a very good success rate with this.
Other activities of Cyberspace Communications include:
* Publicizing the services offered through Grex. Since Grex is well-
established and well-known and already badly overburdened with users,
this activity currently accounts for under 2% of our time. We increase
our publicity whenever we expand our resources.
* Repair and distribution of used computers to people who need them to
access Grex and lack the money or expertise to obtain them. There has
been little demand for this to date, so this activity has accounted for
less than 2% of our time.
* Fundraising to support Grex. We are primarily funded by donations from
our users. We have not been very active in seeking outside funding lest
we lose the sense of being a "grass roots" organization, nor do we like
to pressure our users for money very much lest we scare off people who
cannot afford to pay. Thus our fundraising is very passive, consuming
less than 1% of our time.
Users of Grex engage in a wide range of off-line social activities, but
Cyberspace Communications itself has very little involvement in organizing
or funding these activities.
============================================================================
This is possibly over-long, but I don't know what the normal length is.
There is a large blank on the page, but it is pretty clear that they don't,
in general, expect all the answers to fit in the blanks. I probably want to
do some compatification of this document, if only to improve its readability.
|
janc
|
|
response 6 of 138:
|
Jul 2 03:29 UTC 1997 |
Next couple question:
(2) What are or will be the organization's sources of financial support?
List in order of size.
The ones that come to mind:
- Memberships.
- Other individual and corporate donations of money, goods, and services.
- Sale of promotional items (T-shirts, etc).
- Special fundraising events (charity auctions, etc).
(3) Describe the organization's fundraising program, both actual and planned
and explain to what extent it has been put into effect. Include
details of fundraising activities such as selective mailings, formation
of fundraising committees, use of volunteers or professional fund
raisers, etc. Attach representative copies of soliticitions for
financial support.
This should be easy, since we really aren't very aggressive fund-raisers.
We can attach printouts of the !support command and the web pages that do
the same.
|
janc
|
|
response 7 of 138:
|
Jul 2 03:39 UTC 1997 |
Next moderately interesting question is:
(8) What assests does the organization have that are used in the
performance of its exempt function? (Do not include property
producing investment income.) If any assets are not fully
operational, explain their status, what additional steps remain
to be completed, and when such steps will be taken.
I don't really believe they want a detailed list of every bit of broken
computer hardware we own. I think they just want to get a feeling that
the organization actually exists and has the wherewithal to actually pursue
activities it claims to pursue. I'll probably list something like:
Sun 4/260 - Main Grex computer - operational
486 PC - Grex router - operational
Sun 4/670 - Future replacement Grex computer -
currently being set up to replace the Sun 4/260
Many Modems - operational
Many spare computer parts, office furnature, etc.
|
janc
|
|
response 8 of 138:
|
Jul 2 04:11 UTC 1997 |
Next interesting question:
(11) Is the organization a membership organization?
If yes, complete the following:
(a) Describe the organization's membership requirements and attach a
schedule of membership fees and dues.
(b) Describe the organizations present and proposed efforts to attract
members and attach a copy of nay descriptive literature or promotional
material used for this purpose.
(c) What benefits do (or will) the members receive in exchange for their
payment of dues?
We are a membership organization, and I think most of this is pretty
straight-forward. Except I think the "institutional members" described in
the bylaw amendment currently being voted on are, legally speaking, not
"members" at all, since they can't vote.
|
janc
|
|
response 9 of 138:
|
Jul 2 04:38 UTC 1997 |
(13) Does or will the organization attempt to influence legislation?
If "Yes" explain. Also, give an extimate of the percentage of the
organization's time and funds that it devotes to this activity.
This is a tricky one. From the instructions:
An organization is attemtping to influence legislation if it contacts or
urges the public to contact members of a legislative body, for the
purpose of proposing, supporting, or opposing legislation, or if it
advocates the adoption or rejection of legislation.
If you answer "Yes", you may want to file Form 5768, Election/Revocation
of Election by an Eligiable Section 501(c)3 Organization To Make
Expenditures To Influence Legislation.
I want to answer "yes" to this one, just to keep the door open for Grex to
do things like black out its web page in protest of the CDA and even issue
statements opposing such legislation. This isn't really a primary purpose
of Grex though. People wanting to do such things are probably better advised
to use organizations like the EFF or ACLU as their vehicle. Still we should
leave Grex some leeway on this.
Political activity is kind of a sensitive area of tax-exempt organizations.
From the IRS's publication 557 ("Tax Exempt Status for Your Organization"):
POLITICAL ACTIVITY. If any of the activities (whether or not substantial)
of your organization consist of participating in or intervening in, any
political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for
public office, your organization will not qualify for tax-exempt status
under section 501(c)(3). Such participation or intervention includes
the publication or distribution of statements.
Whether your organization is participating or intervening, directly
or indirectly in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition
to) any candidate for public office depends on all of the facts and
circumstances of each case. Certain voter education activities or
public forums conducted in a non-partisan may not constitute political
activity under section 501(c)(3); while other so-called voter education
activities may constitute prohibited activity. If your organization is
uncertain as to the effect of its voter education activities, you should
request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service[...].
My reading is that this doesn't prevent us from opposing things like the CDA,
or having people argue about who they want for president on-line, but it would
prevent Cyberspace Communications from endorsing particular candidates. I
think this is fine with us. My plan is to check this box "yes" and say that
Cyberspace Communications sometimes takes official public stances on issues
directly relevant to our mission, such as those relating to privacy and
censorship on the internet. I'd give our blacking out our web page in protest
of the CDA as an example, and say that this activity is less than 1% of our
total activity.
Next question is:
(14) Does or will the organization intervene in any way in political
campaigns, including the publication or distribution of statements?
I'd give a flat "no" on this one. Not only do I think saying yes would
endanger our 501(c)3 application, I really think it would be an inappropriate
thing for Cyberspace Communications to do under any circumstances.
|
janc
|
|
response 10 of 138:
|
Jul 2 04:46 UTC 1997 |
Part III of the application is "Techical Requirements". Basically, we fail
all sorts of tests here because we waited too long to file this form after
organizing Cyberspace Communications. The upshot of all this is that we will
only be able to request tax-exempt status effective the date our application
is filed, not retro-actively for the full history of Cyberspace
Communications. Too bad, but OK.
There are some questions relating to whether we are seeking a definitive
(final) ruling on our case or an advance ruling. Definitive rulings are based
on past financial data. That's what we want, I think.
|
janc
|
|
response 11 of 138:
|
Jul 2 05:05 UTC 1997 |
Part IV is financial data. We are required to report financial data for the
current year, and the three preceding years. Stuff we need includes:
Gifts, grants, and contributions received.
Membership fees received.
Gross investment income
Net income from organization's unrelated business activities not included
in gross investment income
Tax revenues levied for and either paid to or spent on behalf of the
organization
Value of services or facilities furnished by a government unit to the
organization without charge (not including value of services or
facilities generally furnished the public without charge)
Other income (not including gain or loss from sale of capital assents)
Total of the above
Gross receipts from admissions, sales of merchandise or services, or
furnishing of facilities in any activity that is not an unrelated
business within the meaning of section 513.
Total
Gain or loss from sale of capital assets
Unusual grants
Total Revenue
Fundraising Expenses
Contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts paid.
Disbursements to or for benefit of members
Compensation of officers, directors or trustees.
Other Salaries or wages
Interest
Occupancy (rent, utilities, etc)
Depreciation and depletion
Other
Total Expenses
Excess of revenue over expenses.
They also want a current balance sheet, showing
ASSETS:
Cash
Accounts receivable, net
Inventories
Bonds and notes receivable
Corporate stocks
Mortgage loans
Depreciable and depletable assets
Land
Other assets
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable
Contributions, gifts, grants, etc, payable
Mortgages and notes payable
Other liabilities
Looks like fun, eh? Luckily we have an awful lot of zeros in an awful lot
of those boxes.
|
janc
|
|
response 12 of 138:
|
Jul 2 05:07 UTC 1997 |
That's about it. We also need things like our EIN (Employer Identification
Number) and conformed copies of our articles of incorporation and lots of
other little tid-bits, but most of that will be simple.
|
mary
|
|
response 13 of 138:
|
Jul 2 12:22 UTC 1997 |
Jan, is it true that "all users" can "surf the web" from Grex?
I applaud Jan for all the work his is adopting when taking
on this project. Also, I agree 100% that what we say in
our application has to match what we are not what the IRS
would like to hear. There is going to be a strong temptation
to bend things a bit to get it by. I hope we can avoid
doing so.
|
janc
|
|
response 14 of 138:
|
Jul 2 14:54 UTC 1997 |
Yes, lynx is accessible to all users. The part about all users being able
to retrieve files isn't quite right. I'd forgotten outgoing ftp is restricted
to members. I need to cut that out.
|
valerie
|
|
response 15 of 138:
|
Jul 2 21:59 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
dang
|
|
response 16 of 138:
|
Jul 3 01:41 UTC 1997 |
from what I've seen here, it looks to me like Grex is eligible for 501(c)3.
If needed, I'll help with the form, although I'm not sure how much help I'd
be.
|
srw
|
|
response 17 of 138:
|
Jul 3 04:54 UTC 1997 |
HVCN should be able to get you a copy of it's (successful) application.
I have to remember to bug Arnold to get this for you.
|
scg
|
|
response 18 of 138:
|
Jul 4 17:11 UTC 1997 |
re 9:
If a political candidate were to log into Grex and say stuff relevant
to their campaign, would that constitute Cyberspace Communications publishing
or distributing the candidates statements?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 19 of 138:
|
Jul 4 18:33 UTC 1997 |
Answer "yes" to (13), and file 5758. This regularizes the procedures. You
cannot *avoid* doing things that might influence legislation, so you best
adopt the formal procedures under 5768 (I have just recently gotten
another organization to elect 5768).
I have the HVCN material that Arnold provided, and will pack it up to send
to Jan. Nothing seemed to be happening on this for a long time, so it was
easy to procrastinate.
By the way, the IRS has just issued new final rules on "perks". Dues to a
501(c)3 organization are tax deductible, but now all membership benefits
"that can be exercised frequently during the membership period" do not
have to be disclosed, if the dues are less than $75. This neatly covers
the telnet "perk". The details are, of course, long and complicated, but
the result is that there is no longer any argument over such frequenhtly
exercised "perks" being allowed or disallowed. (Examples given in the
regulations are such things as discounts on goods or services and parking
fee reductions, for members.)
|
scott
|
|
response 20 of 138:
|
Jul 4 19:18 UTC 1997 |
I think we are safe with politics. Any political candidate will have
the same platform as anybody else on Grex.
|
janc
|
|
response 21 of 138:
|
Jul 4 19:41 UTC 1997 |
I'll have to figure out what 5768 is. I certainly agree with saying "yes"
to (13).
I look forward to receiving the HVCN material. You can mail it to me at 406
West Liberty, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, or get it to us some other way.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 22 of 138:
|
Jul 5 18:13 UTC 1997 |
5768 is just a form. You can download it from the IRS. The board most
adopt a motion to elect to lobby under its terms, which are specific.
Without it, you are in the *undefined* "no substantial part" category.
|
aruba
|
|
response 23 of 138:
|
Jul 6 23:46 UTC 1997 |
Wow, that's a lot of work, Jan. Thanks for doing it. Here are a few things:
#5: In (3) "an necessary component" should be "a necessary component".
You need a perion at the end of (4).
#6: I do occasionally approach individual users and ask them if they'd
consider becoming members of Grex. Don't know if that counts as
fundraising efforts of Cyberspace Communications or not.
#7: How about replacing "many modems" with "15 modems" (or whatever
the correct number is).
I guess I need to organize the financial records for the last 3 years.
|
janc
|
|
response 24 of 138:
|
Jul 8 21:22 UTC 1997 |
OK, I've been reading up more on 5768 and Lobbying expenditures. Basically,
if "attempting to influence legislation" is a "substantial" part of an
organization's activities, it does not qualify for 501(c)3 status. I haven't
found a good definition of "substantial," but I have found a definition of
"attempting to influence legislation." It includes both "grass roots
lobbying" which consists of trying to influence the opinion of the general
public on an issue before legislation, and "direct lobbying" which is
communications with members of the legislature. Exceptions include:
- making available results of nonpartisan studies or research.
- Examining or discussing broad social, economic, and similar problems.
- providing assistance to a government body in response to a written
request for information.
- appearing before or communicating with any legislative body with respect
to a possible decision of that body that might affect the existence of
the organization, its powers and duties, its tax-exempt status, or the
deduction of contributions to the organization.
So, if something like the CDA came up again, Cyberspace Communications would
be OK writing letters to our senator saying that it is a direct threat to
our worthy system, but apparantly asking our users to do so would be barred.
Our response to the CDA was, in fact, to black out our web page and post the
blue ribbon icon. This is "grassroots lobbying" and doesn't fit any of the
exceptions above, but since that is, to the best of my knowledge, the sum
total of Grex's "lobbying," it is pretty clearly not "a substantive part of
our activities" so we were still OK. I have a hard time imagining such
activity ever becoming what anyone would call a substantive part of our
activities.
However, even if it did, dropping 501(c)3 status is not the only option. You
can file form 5768 to change the rules under which you are tested. If you
elect to do so, the "substative part of your activities" test is replaced
with a limit on lobbying defined in terms of how large a fraction you can
spend on lobbying. Under these rules, Cyberspace Communications would be
limited to spending on direct lobbying to less than 20% of our exempt
expenditures, and spending on grassroots lobbying to less than 5% of our
exempt expenditures. If we exceed those limits, we have to pay an excise
tax. If we spend more than 150% of those limits, we loss our 501(c)3
status. (Actually, the rules are much more complex, but I've simplified them
on the assumption that Grex's tax-exempt expenditures are not going to exceed
$500,000 any time soon.) If we elect this option, we must file a form each
year declaring how much we did spend on lobbying.
My feeling is that we should skip form 5768 for now. You can switch back
and forth reasonably freely. If during the course of some year we decided
that we would be doing more lobbying, we could, any time during that year,
submit a 5768 and change our status for that tax year. I don't forsee that
happening. We aren't a lobbying organization. I'd only support getting
into that if it were clear that in some way Cyberspace Communications was
uniquely suited to play a role in lobbying for some legislation that directly
impacted our mission. I expect to see plenty more legislation coming around
that could impact us, but in almost any case I can imagine, there are better
vehicles than Cyberspace Communictions to fight such fights (such as the
ones that did, in fact, fight the CDA).
I'd want to say something to that effect on the application form maybe:
>Does or will the organization attempt to influence legislation?
Yes.
>If "Yes," explain. Also give an estimate of the percentage of the
>organization's time and funds that it devotes or plans to devote to this
>activity.
Cyberspace Communications does not attempt to influence legislation as a
substantial activity. Legislation is often discussed by users of our
system, but Cyberspace Communications does not limit participation in or
otherwise attempt to influence the content of such discussions. Cyberspace
Communications may, in the case of legislation in areas that would directly
impact our mission (e.g., Internet free speech and privacy), take a public
stance on issues, but this would be unusual and never a substantial part of
our activities. Our only such action to date was joining the "blue ribbon
campaign" against the "Communications Decency Act" by blacking out our web
page. Given the uncertain future of Internet legislation, the possibility
that Cyberspace Communications would elect to make more substantial lobbying
efforts, as allowed for under section 501(h), cannot be excluded, but our
plan and firm expectation is that lobbying will continue to account for
less than a hundredth of one percent of our activities.
501(h) is the section of the tax code enabling the alternate rules invoked
through the 5768 form.
|