You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-90       
 
Author Message
steve
How would you change Grex, and it what way? Mark Unseen   Apr 8 13:33 UTC 1996

   I'm currently reading the "State of Coop" item.  I just stopped
reading a response to enter this.

   I'd like to hear people say how they'd change Grex if they could
just wave the "magic Grexwand" and have it done.

   What things would you change?  Remember, it can be anything.
Social, technical, financial, etc.

   Use this as a magical soapbox.   But let's not talk about each
others ideas, yet.  Just use this as a forum for speaking your ideas
(it's OK to change them and enter multiple times if you want) and
for the reading of others.

   I'm interesting in hearing what people say.
90 responses total.
robh
response 1 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 13:48 UTC 1996

Hmm.  I'm thinking of several things, none of them inherently
social.  (Though they would have an effect on Grex's social
aspects, as would any major change to the system.)

<robh waves his wand and says "XYZZY">

Grex suddenly has a T1 connection, and a good route box to go
with it, thus allowing far more people to use the system at once.
The webmasters confer, and decided that allowing pictures on
Grex Web pages is okay now.

<robh waves his wand and says "PLUGH">

The webmasters also find a way to offer various stock CGI programs
for the users to include in their pages.  (I would give Grex a huge
staff to hand-vet every CGI program any users wanted to install,
but there's only so much magic I'm capable of.  >8)

<robh waves his wand and says "PLOVER">

I'd like to see the Grex benefit show come off.

That's all for now, I'm sure I'll add more.
gregc
response 2 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 15:04 UTC 1996

<gregc waves an archaic magic wand that cannot be looked upon, and
 utters a word that cannot be pronounced by human tongues.>

<REALLY BIG *POOF*>

Grex now exists on 27 Cray 2's spread all over the world and connected
by multi-homed T3/FDDI/satellite links. Everyone in the world has a login.
It's all free. We have a paid staff of 1 million. NASA and several world
governments come to us for advice. Using these vast resources, the R&D
department has solved the riddle of nuclear fussion. Power is dirt cheap.
World hunger and poverty have been ended. Forget about the yacht, next
year Grex begins work on it's first starship.

See? This item is pointless.

Given a fantasy scenario with no limits, this simply becomes a "my wish is
bigger than your wish" contest. Grex exists in an environment of many
limitations. Why don't we keep things to what we *can* do andkeep this
sort of thing in the fantasy conference?
srw
response 3 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 17:40 UTC 1996

I enjoyed reading that. (oops that was off topic, sorry.)

I would like to see the Grex interface improved so that people don't have to
learn a command line interface to join in our converstaions. Ideally they also
wouldn't have to wade through a long questionnaire which asks them questions
they don't know the ansewr to, just in order to get an account here.

(look ma, no wand.)
brighn
response 4 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 19:40 UTC 1996

A friend's list would be nice.  I've been told why it isn't feasible,
but that was based on the concept working like m-net (always active,
m-net users get little flags the moment a friends logs on or off).
Monolith BBS, in contrast, simply has a friend's listing:  with
acommand, you can get a listing of just those people you want to
see.  
Such a humble fantasy.  =}  I just hate scanning the !users list for 
only two or three names, especially since there are a few users who
irritate me so much that just seeing their handlee on the screen makes
me want to throw something.
(Monolith also has the log-on/log-off flagging, but I can understand
how that can be a systems resources drain.)

All right, now for the fun fantasies:
Point and click interfacing!
The first party system publicly available with visuals!
Scratch-and-sniff options in private channels!
Speech recognition!
Grex-controlled droids to clean my apartmetn!
arthurp
response 5 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 20:26 UTC 1996

A web interface to confing would be great and help readership I think, but
alas, the glitter is still swirling in the glass on this one.  ;)

I think a friends/enemies list wouldn't be too hard to add to writes/tels,
but I don't imagine there is enough demand to warrant someone sitting down
with the source code and adding a bunch of stuff to support it.
steve
response 6 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 22:17 UTC 1996

   (This isn't a useless item, Greg.  I'd like to see what people
want.  That I know of, I haven't seen that they users have been
asked this in a LONG time, if ever.  Perhaps there are things that
people would like, that we can do soon.  Even if everything is just
'wishlist' stuff it can be useful for the next budget planning meeting.)
remmers
response 7 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 8 22:42 UTC 1996

(Re #4: If by "friends list" you mean what I think you mean, it's
an easy shell script to write. Send me mail if you want details.)
kerouac
response 8 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 00:23 UTC 1996

 hmmm...by "friends list" do you mean like a "watch" prog where you
get notified each time one of your friends logs on while you are on?
carson
response 9 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 01:02 UTC 1996

I dunno. I suppose that if Grex had been mine from the get-go, and if
I were fluent in technical and software areas, I'd've set up newuser
such that it could only be run from the dial-ups. I'm glad that 
Grex didn't go either route (the "single-owner" or the "limited-
access").

One of my pet dreams is to earn more money than I'd know what to
do with, and set up something similar to Grex in another state, say,
South Dakota, with the caveat that it'd be donated to the members
within two years.
kerouac
response 10 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 01:12 UTC 1996

   I'd like to see the web-based conferencing link become reality.  Also
it would be nice if when you reach the Grex webpage, you could log 
straight in (since you are already there) instead of having to telnet
in from there like you were coming from any other page.  
arthurp
response 11 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 03:13 UTC 1996

What I mean by a friends list and an enemies list is that tel/write would
first consult this list to determine whether you are accepting tels/writes
from friends only, everyone except enemies, or everyone.  A couple options
would have to be added to turn on and off these various levels, and provisions
for checking the .friends and .enemies files.  I don't think this would be
too hard to write, but it would lead to a very non-standard tel/write.
kerouac
response 12 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 03:23 UTC 1996

 #12...I dont like the "friends" idea then...I dont think its necessary
and people on here are cliquish enough without being given tools by
staff to become MORE cliquish.  I think this just encourages users
to divide up users they know on grex into "friends" and "enemies", which
sets a bad tone for futur social interaction.  If a new program helps
users in their efforts to interact with others, thats one thing, but
this would defeat the purpose of grex because it allows groups of
people to isolate themselves.  Its just a bad idea.

In my opinion of course.
brighn
response 13 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 03:51 UTC 1996

A friends/enemies list can have several functions:
(1) It informs you when people on your list log on or off, automatically.
(2)  It provides you with a list of friends who are currently logged on
(that is, it compares your list to !users and gives only the matches.  This
list is provided only when you request it.
(3) It prevents people from writing you.  This is little more than an
expanded, permanent filter, and Kerouac, it's hardly cliquish to have people
you'd rather not talk to.  I'm not one for enemies lists anyhow, having
really only three people that I'd not want to get written by, and only
being written by one of those... the other two leave me alone, and I them.

I'm interested in something that would do (2).
I'd like (1), too, but I was told that it would be a system drain, and
it's an NTH and not worth lagging things up.
sekari
response 14 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 04:33 UTC 1996

I like the idea of having (1), I think that that would be better than 
sitting there typing !users twice a minute when I'm bored out of my mind 
waiting for someone to show up

scg
response 15 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 05:53 UTC 1996

I agree about web based conferencing.  I was somewhat skeptical of the idea,
but I've been playing around with BackTalk (janc and srw's conferencing
software) on another system, and it seems really neat.  I don't think I'd use
it, since I already know Picospan and prefer command line interfaces, but it
looks much easier for beginners to get the hang of quickly.

I don't think that needs a lot of discussion in this item, though.  I think
we'll see it here RSN, while this item, if I understand it, is for things that
need to be suggested.

Untlmately, I'd like to see Grex remain a place I can come and talk to
interesting people about interesting things, and can continue to have fun on.
I also want to see Grex continue to be a great system to play around on and
try new things.  I've learned an incredible amount over the last couple of
years from playing around on Grex, and I want other people to be able to have
those experiences too.

Really, I don't want Grex's main characteristics to change much (except that
being faster and more reliable would be a good idea).  I'm sure some people
are going to think it's really backwards to not want a lot of change, but I
don't think so.  If I didn't like Grex the way it is, I wouldn't still be
here.
rcurl
response 16 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 06:15 UTC 1996

Funny, I *never* am "waiting for someone to show up". Someones interesting
are always here, or have been here. Everyone is "on" my list, so I have no
need for a list. Of course, everyone doesn't have to agree with me, but I
agree with the thought that any facility to create "lists" would be mostly
detrimental by fanning the flames of separatism. 

nephi
response 17 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 08:08 UTC 1996

I think that on an open system like ours, where anybody can create a login
id through newuser, having friends/foes lists for write/chat/tel would be
*extremely* useful.  Right now, the staff list is seeing several complaints
per week about sexual harrassment and other types of harrassment, and we're
impotent in most cases, unless the user comes over the link from a cooperative
provider.  Usually, we end up telling victims of harrassment that the only
thing they can do is turn off all their write permissions, which is a real
shame.  A real shame.  

I would *much* rather tell someone that all they need to do is to edit a file
called foes (or whatnot) and put the login id of that person in it.  This
seems *very* empowering for those people.  

Then there's the problem of the folks who are swamped by their popularity.
STeve recently told me about how he sometimes gets a tel or chat request about
every ten minutes, such that he can't get done the stuff he wants to get done.
Without having a "friends" list, he either gets nothing done, or he has to
turn his messages completely off.  

I believe that Valerie (popcorn) routinely leaves her messages off because
of the above two problems, and that she'd probably be able to leave her
messages on (at least partially) if she could use a friends/foes list setup.
remmers
response 18 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 10:46 UTC 1996

Re #13: When you first described the "friends list" concept, I
thought you just meant (2). Yes, that would be an easy script to
write. Mail me for details.
rcurl
response 19 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 17:36 UTC 1996

You have a point, nephi - unfortunately. I don't have the problem of
either being harrassed or of being "too popular", though I have turned off
write because of newcomers just looking for someone with whom to chat. But
the general idea doesn't sit well with me - its like refusing to speak to
someone that speaks to you - generally considered very rude. How about not
naming the files .friends and .foes, though? I'd prefer neutral names,
like .nowrite and .yeswrite. There would also have to be easy ways to
turn those on or off.

brighn
response 20 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 18:09 UTC 1996

(Rane, come on sometime at two a.m. using a female-sounding handle, then
check back in with us about friends/foes lists... I don't get annoying
chats that much myself, but I've had to fend horny male netsexers off
of val, selena, and jenna when said netsexers wouldn't take "no" for
an answer.  One ntalked selena constantly for two weeks, every time
she logged on, until she finally asked me to talk to him.  I told him 
to leave her alone, he said that if she didn't want to be chatted, she
shouldn't be on the Net.  I told him he was harassing her and I'd talk
to baff about it.  He laughed and told me to go right ahead.  I told him
he was being rude.  He apologized profusely and never ntalked Selena
again... some of the Indians are weird.)

Anyway, I don't care if you call them fran and ollie.  If non-loaded
terms makes you more comfortable (and I can see how it would... the
tag on Monolith is something like:
 -- Your friend Selena has just logged on.
and it seems oddly patronizing to me.  *shrug*), then let's use non-
loaded terms.
janc
response 21 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 18:18 UTC 1996

This friends/foes thing is one of the most commonly suggested "improvements"
to write.  Lots of people would like it.  I have a lot of sympathy for some
of the people who have requested it (Like women who are sick and tired of
being accosted by teenage males every five minutes but still want to be able
to write to their friends).  I'm very worried, however, that it would make
Grex a more cliquish and closed society.

I was very amused to hear Kerouac oppose this on the basis that the staffers
would use to be even more cliquish.  The reason the feature doesn't exist is
because the staffers worry that it would make Grex more cliquish.  So I guess
we are in perfect agreement.  Well, *near* perfect.
kerouac
response 22 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 19:30 UTC 1996

  actually, this is a minor point but I have never liked the prompt
you get when you write or tel someone who has their tels turned off.

"insert user name" is not accepting messages!

To me this prompt is too assertive and gives people who dont know better
the impression that the person who turned off their msgs is copping an
attitude instead of simply wanting peace and quiet.

"insert user name" is busy at the present time, try again later
"insert user name" is declining to accept any messages at the present time"

If I turn off my mesgs, I always worry that the current prompt is going
to make me come off as rude.  I think there should be several different
prompt options to reflect different circumtances for why !mesgs are off...


Janc, you misunderstood me ...in my previous response I said staff giving
USERS that tool would give USERS the means to be more cliquish...I never
said staff would use it themselves in that way.  So we are in complete
agreement.  Totally.
robh
response 23 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 20:26 UTC 1996

On a related note, I thought of something else I'd like to see,
which would probably be easier than most of the suggestions so far:

A message stored in a file in the user's directory, which would
be sent to anyone who tried writing that user when their messages
were turned off.

Generally when I download files, I turn my message flag off.  (Since
I wouldn't even be able to see the write messages, never mind
respond to them.)  I've gotten all kinds of bizarre reactions
from people who saw that I was on-line but had my messages turned
off.  ("Oh my god!  I must have offended Rob so badly that he
doesn't want to talk to anyone!" and "Someone must have broken into
Rob's account!" are my two favorites.)  With this feature, anyone
who wrote to me during a download would see a message saying,
"I'm downloading files, please send me mail instead, I'll check my
mail as soon as I'm finished."
nephi
response 24 of 90: Mark Unseen   Apr 9 20:31 UTC 1996

Another neat idea!  (Brainstorming is so cool.  8^)  There'd have to be a
limit on length, though.  I could just see some mischievious user copying
/etc/passwd into his .nowritemesg file.  8^)  

Hmm.  Maybe I should go enter an item talking about how, or if, each of these
changes to write should be made.  

I'll go do that now.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-90       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss