|
|
| Author |
Message |
polytarp
|
|
Why?
| 
Jan 25 23:37 UTC 2004 |
Why was the classic account killed?
|
| 16 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 1 of 16:
|
Jan 25 23:43 UTC 2004 |
Why didn't you re-use your "classics" item to ask the question? For that
matter, why are you bothering to ask? You know quite well why it was
killed: To (try to) prevent your continued vandalism.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 2 of 16:
|
Jan 25 23:47 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 3 of 16:
|
Jan 25 23:50 UTC 2004 |
Re. 1. I didn't reuse my classics item simple because I can't reuse my
classics account. It's a principles thing.
Now, I bother to ask because I don't understand what's wrong with it. As I
understand it, Grex allows users to enter items. That's all I was doing; and
I wasn't entering duplicates or anything nasty like that. Additionally, I
wasn't entering items at any tremendous pace; surely, Grex can handle an item
being entered every five minutes without being overburdened.
This is clearly yet another case of censorship, and I'm the only one who's
incurred any vandalism under it.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 4 of 16:
|
Jan 26 00:41 UTC 2004 |
When it's a system problem, it's not probably not a censorship issue. If
grex allowed similarly large items posted by other users but not those
posted by you, then it would be a censorship issue.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 5 of 16:
|
Jan 26 00:44 UTC 2004 |
That doesn't make any sense; it's like saying it wouldn't be a censorship
issue if Grex was deleting posts with certain opinions, as long as it was
doing it to all people who posted them.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 6 of 16:
|
Jan 26 00:50 UTC 2004 |
Opinions are not a system problem. Large files are.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 7 of 16:
|
Jan 26 00:54 UTC 2004 |
Non-sense.
|
naftee
|
|
response 8 of 16:
|
Jan 26 01:04 UTC 2004 |
Rubbish.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 9 of 16:
|
Jan 26 01:06 UTC 2004 |
Malarky.
|
scott
|
|
response 10 of 16:
|
Jan 26 02:52 UTC 2004 |
Please don't feed the troll, cyklone.
|
kip
|
|
response 11 of 16:
|
Jan 26 03:03 UTC 2004 |
So most Grexers wouldn't be offended if I simply took care of what I perceive
to be vandalism or childish behavior and then simply ignored the complaints
that followed from said cleanup?
Hmmm, I might have to try that.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 12 of 16:
|
Jan 26 03:18 UTC 2004 |
I'm not sure what you mean by "simply ignored the complaints", kip.
Would you mind expanding upon your comment?
|
kip
|
|
response 13 of 16:
|
Jan 26 06:13 UTC 2004 |
I'm sorry, on my own second reading, I see that I wasn't very clear there.
I was suggesting that after vandalism was dealt with, should I simply ignore
the complaints of the vandals that I'm depriving them of whatever it is they
feel I took by cleaning up after them.
Certainly if they were other complaints from others about my action, I would
not ignore them.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 14 of 16:
|
Jan 26 11:47 UTC 2004 |
If the 'vandal' asks a question, as in 0 above, it should be answered, as
in 1 above. General railing and wailing should be handled as you see fit.
|
kip
|
|
response 15 of 16:
|
Jan 26 12:28 UTC 2004 |
Fair enough, that seems reasonable. I'll try that out and see what happens.
|
jesuit
|
|
response 16 of 16:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|