You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-18          
 
Author Message
ryan
Everyone has an "Item Restoration" Item... My turn to have one. Mark Unseen   Jan 22 21:41 UTC 2004

This item has been erased.

18 responses total.
tod
response 1 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 22:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

cyklone
response 2 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 23:30 UTC 2004

Sounds good to me, tod.
jp2
response 3 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 23:58 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 4 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 00:59 UTC 2004

Tough shit for ryan.
jp2
response 5 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 01:07 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

slynne
response 6 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 15:23 UTC 2004

I think it is fair to put the notification in the actual item itself. 
It would be unreasonable to expect a fw to notify users who are no 
longer on the system. 
tod
response 7 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 16:39 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 8 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 18:39 UTC 2004

As much as I recognize the controversy surrounding the items deleted, which
will remain (increase?) when they are restored, other than scribbling the
words of the creators of the items - which they could have and should have
done for themselves, instead of having the items deleted - these items should
be restored *intact*.  Other posters can then go and scribble their responses,
just as they could for any other item.  jep could have and should have done
this, instead of requesting his items be deleted:  He should have scribbled
his own responses first.  He could have then retired the item.  He then could
have himself personally contacted all the other posters, telling them what
he had done and why, and requested them to scribble their responses too.
I think that is exactly what should happen once these items are restored,
given that the first step - the scribbling of the creators' comments - will
have been done "for free", by staff.
jp2
response 9 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:06 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 10 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:23 UTC 2004

That's fine with me, especially since it's part of the proposal.
ryan
response 11 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:26 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 12 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:27 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

ryan
response 13 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 20:29 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 14 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 21:00 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

cyklone
response 15 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 22:20 UTC 2004

Actually, under remmer's reasonable solution, I don't think ryan's fears
are justified. I don't believe any of the polybots posted to jep's item.
Since the proposal is to privately allow deletions before public posting,
the copyable item, for them anyway, will already contain the various
*voluntary* deletions.
naftee
response 16 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 04:41 UTC 2004

re 11 You should be in bed if you're so sick.  Go to bed and stay there for
a long, long itme.
naftee
response 17 of 18: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 04:41 UTC 2004

time
jesuit
response 18 of 18: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-18          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss