You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-34         
 
Author Message
jp2
Scribble this Mark Unseen   Jan 8 19:33 UTC 2004

This item has been erased.

34 responses total.
willcome
response 1 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 19:48 UTC 2004

I vote yes.
mynxcat
response 2 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 19:57 UTC 2004

Remember, if you're fw, and you want to scripple your post, it won't 
let you, in BackTalk
jp2
response 3 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 19:58 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

mynxcat
response 4 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 19:59 UTC 2004

Unluckily, I can't telnet in from work.
gull
response 5 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 20:20 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

willcome
response 6 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 20:30 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 7 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 21:01 UTC 2004

No vote is necessary, but I see no reason to object to the conference.
I doubt it will be very interesting, but if that's what you want, go for it.
willcome
response 8 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 21:38 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 9 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 23:03 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 10 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 19:49 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

willcome
response 11 of 34: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 19:50 UTC 2004

HEY, let me be FW< please!
jp2
response 12 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 16:44 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 13 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 20:42 UTC 2004

> All text must be scribbled by the poster immedietly after posting.

> I will FW. 

And as FW, if someone *doesn't* scribble his/her text "immedietly" (sic) after
posting, are you going to take it upon yourself to do so?  If that is what you
have in mind, then please be advised that at this moment, there is no
consensus or policy that would view that as acceptable FW behavior.  So if
you do that, and someone complains, expect your FW privileges to be revoked
with all dispatch.
jp2
response 14 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 20:51 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 15 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 20:59 UTC 2004

There is a proposal entered - which might be put to a vote one of these days
- dunno - which would allow the establishment of such conference-specific
norms, one of which might in fact be "expect scribbling at every turn".
Why anyone would want to participate in such a conf. is beyond me.
But at the moment there is no consensus that such a conf. with expanded FW
"censorship" powers can exist on grex.  Maybe soon, but not right now.
twinkie
response 16 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 4 07:24 UTC 2004

re: 15

You'd be surprised, actually. 

M-Net wrestled over whether stating that items may be scribbled in a
conference's charter was enough. I think the debate popped up a couple times,
and lasted for weeks. 

I believe the Twinkie Conference (on M-Net) is the only conference where
scribbling at every turn is allowed. It is also one of the most popular
conferences (besides General) on the system. In fact, I think there have been
more than a few months when it was *the* most popular non-General conference.

People tend not to object very much to having their responses scribbled when
you come right out and say "Hey, if you write something, it may be scribbled
by somebody who isn't you." It's telling them (and backing it up with charter)
that's the key.

cyklone
response 17 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 4 13:15 UTC 2004

Full disclosure in advance. What a novel concept!
naftee
response 18 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 4 14:14 UTC 2004

The Twinkie conference on m-net sucks.  The only reason why it is marginally
active is that there happen to be a lot of homosexual people on m-net who
adore twinkie.
twinkie
response 19 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 4 17:18 UTC 2004

You're just upset because you've been banned from it.

naftee
response 20 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 4 21:18 UTC 2004

Wow, how little you know.
twinkie
response 21 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 4 21:57 UTC 2004

Cry about it in the Polytarp Conference.

naftee
response 22 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 01:36 UTC 2004

twinkie, I haven't been "banned" from the m-net twinkie conference.  The
only wasto do that is to make it read-only, such as the staff conference is. 
Now shut up and stop lying about m-net things.
twinkie
response 23 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 17:51 UTC 2004

"Banned from posting". Better now, crybaby?

naftee
response 24 of 34: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 23:58 UTC 2004

Worse.  Ever hear of backtalk, poltergeist?
 0-24   25-34         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss