|
Grex > Coop13 > #64: Cyberspace Communications finances for December 2003 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
aruba
|
|
Cyberspace Communications finances for December 2003
|
Jan 1 16:21 UTC 2004 |
Here is the treasurer's report on Cyberspace Communications, Inc. finances
through December 31st, 2003.
Beginning Balance $4,041.40
Credits $651.00 Member contributions
$17.00 Miscellaneous donations
$140.00 Donation to pay for speakerphone
$1.68 Interest on our savings account
------------
$809.68
Debits $80.41 Pumpkin Rent for January
$45.97 Electricity for December
$0.00 Phone Bill (see below)
$135.00 DSL December 15 through January 15
$10.22 Paypal fees (income = $270)
$22.83 Winter Personal Property Taxes
$140.00 Speakerphone (see below)
------------
$434.43
Ending Balance $4,416.65
Our current balance breaks down as follows:
$4,170.11 General Fund
$163.99 Silly Hat Fund
$60.00 Spare Parts Fund
$22.55 Infrastructure Fund
The money is distributed like this:
$1,046.40 Checking account
$3,370.25 Savings account earning 0.65% interest annually
We had two new members (kd3hw and garrigan) and one returning member
(fhoda) in December. We are currently at 84 members, 81 of whom are
paid through at least January 15th. (The others expired recently and
are in a grace period.)
Notes:
- It was a good month for Grex!
- This month's phone charges totalled $90.83. But we received a
refund for the $168 in installation charges we paid to SBC last month,
which covered the bill and left us with a credit of $77.17. So next
month's bill will only be about $13.
- Because we have a board member who will be connecting to meetings
by phone next year, mary bought us a speakerphone for $140. We tried
it out at the last meeting and it worked great. After a little bit of
discussion of whether we should return it and maybe try to find a
cheaper one, mdw offered to donate $140 to pay for the phone just so
we would all shut up and move on. His generous offer was accepted. :)
- Grex pays personal property taxes to the City of Ann Arbor on the
equipment it owns. The payments are divided into winter and summer
taxes, with the winter ones being about half the size of the summer
ones.
Thanks to everyone who contributed in December:
arabella, dang, dpc, fhoda, garrigan, jep, kd3hw, mdw, mooncat, other,
russ, siamiam, tod, wlevak, and two people of whose logins I am
unsure.
If you or your institution would like to become a member of Grex, it
only costs $6/month or $60/year. Send money to:
Cyberspace Communications
P. O. Box 4432
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432
If you pay by cash or money order, please include a photocopy of some
form of ID. I can't add you to the rolls without ID. (If you pay
with a personal check that has your name pre-printed on it, we
consider that a good enough ID.) Type !support or see
http://www.cyberspace.org/member.html for more info.
|
| 62 responses total. |
naftee
|
|
response 1 of 62:
|
Jan 1 16:43 UTC 2004 |
Great report, MMArk!
|
aruba
|
|
response 2 of 62:
|
Jan 1 18:02 UTC 2004 |
Whoops, I realized I forgot something. One $12 check which I deposited in
November bounced. So there should be an additional $12 debit for the check
and a $5 penalty. The person who bounced the check has promised to replace
it and to pay the fee.
So subtract $17 from our balance. I've corrected the copy of the report in
~aruba/reports/0312.txt .
|
aruba
|
|
response 3 of 62:
|
Jan 1 19:20 UTC 2004 |
OK, another thing I forgot. (Normally I would roll these things into next
month, but since it's the end of the year, I'd like to get it right.)
We moved cyberspace.org from Verisign to Dotster, and paid Dotster $8.95 to
register it through 1/12/2006. So make our end-of-year balance $4,390.70.
|
willcome
|
|
response 4 of 62:
|
Jan 1 20:39 UTC 2004 |
Grex lost nearly a thousand dollars over 2003!
|
aruba
|
|
response 5 of 62:
|
Jan 1 21:36 UTC 2004 |
See the next item.
|
naftee
|
|
response 6 of 62:
|
Jan 1 23:03 UTC 2004 |
re 2 Isn't it the person that issues the bounced cheque supposed to pay the
penalty, and not the depositer?
|
aruba
|
|
response 7 of 62:
|
Jan 1 23:15 UTC 2004 |
I think it' standard practice for both parties to get charged something.
|
keesan
|
|
response 8 of 62:
|
Jan 1 23:40 UTC 2004 |
Does grex now have to pay personal property tax on the new phone?
|
aruba
|
|
response 9 of 62:
|
Jan 2 15:27 UTC 2004 |
Yes, I'm afraid so. It's not in the Pumpkin, though, so I'm not absolutely
positive. I should read the fine print on the tax return.
|
keesan
|
|
response 10 of 62:
|
Jan 2 22:34 UTC 2004 |
Perhaps Marcus could own the phone and lend it to grex once a month?
|
jep
|
|
response 11 of 62:
|
Jan 3 07:18 UTC 2004 |
That would leave Grex short one Board member if there was a problem
getting the phone to the meeting for any reason. I think a Grex
officer should keep the phone, and Grex should just pay the taxes.
|
remmers
|
|
response 12 of 62:
|
Jan 3 16:23 UTC 2004 |
I don't see how Grex owning the phone solves anything. If Grex owns
it and an officer keeps it, and the officer can't make it to a meeting
for some reason, you've got the same problem.
|
jp2
|
|
response 13 of 62:
|
Jan 3 18:32 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 14 of 62:
|
Jan 4 00:54 UTC 2004 |
That might present problems for the local dialins. ;>
|
aruba
|
|
response 15 of 62:
|
Jan 7 04:27 UTC 2004 |
Scott and I measured the current Grex and NextGrex are drawing, and it's
13.25 amps. We have been paying for 5.5 amps for the past 2 and a half
years, so the electric bill will jump significantly next month. Hopefully
before long we'll be on only one machine.
I guess we should say a big thanks to Jan and Valerie for footing the bill
for NextGrex's amps up to now.
|
keesan
|
|
response 16 of 62:
|
Jan 7 05:10 UTC 2004 |
I thought that newer computers were supposed to use less electricity.
|
jep
|
|
response 17 of 62:
|
Jan 7 05:17 UTC 2004 |
Yeah, if the new computer is drawing almost twice as much power as the
Sun, that would be pretty surprising, wouldn't it?
|
naftee
|
|
response 18 of 62:
|
Jan 7 13:31 UTC 2004 |
It's just that much more powerful.
|
carson
|
|
response 19 of 62:
|
Jan 7 13:35 UTC 2004 |
(thanks, Jan and Valerie, for footing the bill for NextGrex's amps up
to now!)
|
davel
|
|
response 20 of 62:
|
Jan 7 14:11 UTC 2004 |
(Thanks, Carson. Mark said we should say it, but didn't say it ...)
|
aruba
|
|
response 21 of 62:
|
Jan 7 15:15 UTC 2004 |
THanks, Jan and Valerie, for footing the bill for NextGrex's power up to
now!
|
gull
|
|
response 22 of 62:
|
Jan 7 18:37 UTC 2004 |
I wonder why the power drain is so much larger for the new machine than
for the Sun?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 23 of 62:
|
Jan 7 18:38 UTC 2004 |
I wonder if there is something else going on, like the old equipment
drawing more than we realised.
|
jp2
|
|
response 24 of 62:
|
Jan 7 18:42 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|