willcome
|
|
Transient copyright violation: IN THIS ITEM
| 
Dec 24 18:38 UTC 2003 |
As an outside observer, I noticed that item one before this caused a lot of
controversy. One side, apparently, appreciated its brilliance, while the
other side couldn't understand, and showed this by forgetting the item.
However, this left the argument unresolved & blue-balled, and, since none of
us like that, I'm going to force the issue:
This is a declamation of proclamation. No-one, let alone YOU, shall escape
its breadth. No-one's going to let you slip if you attempt this. We'll
bulwark What You Should Do by kicking you and slapping your admittedly cute
face while having painful eyes. Don't forget that the only reason you're
here
is because I'm able to give your answer while asking you the question.
2 new of 8 responses total.
#1 of 8: by Jim Daloonik (naftee) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (03:29):
---- plongeur joining (Dec 23 02:33)
plongeur: love.
plongeur: Love yourself, plongeur.
plongeur: And accord yourself the benefit you would you ANYONE you love.
#2 of 8: by Eric R Bassey (other) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (09:20): <expurgated
& scribbled>
#3 of 8: by Eric R Bassey (other) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (09:21):
Would someone link this item to /dev/null please?
#4 of 8: by John H. Remmers (remmers) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (09:33):
"Forget" is remarkably efficacious.
#5 of 8: by Greg Fleming (flem) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (12:02):
"Don't forget that the only reason you're here is because I'm able to
give your answer while asking you the question."
Quite possibly the most interesting thing you've ever said, willcome.
#6 of 8: by Jim Daloonik (naftee) on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 (00:14):
The whole response is brilliant. Anyone who forgets this item is a jerk!!
#7 of 8: by Jan Wolter (janc) on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 (11:20):
So, if all staff members and board members ares are supposed to read this
conference, are we allowed to forget items in it? After all, you never know
when even the most brainless and inappropriate item might turn into a serious
discussion topic, which would then be missed by all the baff who are supposed
to be weighing the words of every user to help formulate the perfect policy
for Grex.
Well, I guess item did just turn vaguely relevant, although at this point
it
is only being read by latecomers, idiots, and those who martyr themselves
by
refusing to forget anything. This is not a useful set of people to hold a
discussion with, so I'll answer my own question by forgetting this item
myself.
#8 of 8: by Carson (carson) on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 (13:04):
(hey! I resent being part of a useless set! and to be called an idiot
on top of that... uh, yeah. Jan's right again.)
|