You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-12          
 
Author Message
richard
Wrong registered agent listed for Grex in Item #1? Mark Unseen   Dec 3 03:27 UTC 2003

Was reading the Articles of Incorporation (item #1 in Coop) and noted that
it says:

The name of the registered agent at the office is:

                           Michael Smerza

 ARTICLE 5
         The name and address of the incorporator is:
                           Michael Smerza
                           4125 Sunset Court
                           Ann Arbor, Mi. 48103

I assume that this item has simply been copied over from past Coops, and
that this information is likely no longer correct.  Wouldn't Aruba now be
listed as Grex's official registered agent since he was more than likely
treasurer whenever it was the paperwork was last renewed?

I'n not saying that anybody official is ever going to read the Articles of
Incorporation as posted in Coop, but wouldn't it be a good idea to update
that info. anyway just in case.  Wouldn't want grex related mail going to
the wrong address right?
12 responses total.
naftee
response 1 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 03:58 UTC 2003

Snoopers.
remmers
response 2 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 11:50 UTC 2003

I think that item is a copy of the original incorporation papers
filed with the state.  The registered agent has changed; it would
be appropriate to add a response listing the current one.
aruba
response 3 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 17:30 UTC 2003

Yes, I am currently the registered agent for Grex.  Mail to Grex should be
sent to:

Cyberspace Communications, Inc.
P.O. Box 4432
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432
remmers
response 4 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 19:32 UTC 2003

Would it be appropriate to append that address information as a response
to item 1?  The FW would have to do it, since it's a frozen item.
cmcgee
response 5 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 20:04 UTC 2003

Ok, I looked.  I think we had this discussion last coop.  I agree that putting
the current agent's address as response 1 for that item makes sense.
aruba
response 6 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 20:13 UTC 2003

Well, I think you should put Grex's mailing adress, not my home address,
even though it's the registered address for Grex.  I don't want anyone
sending Grex mail to my house.
other
response 7 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 21:30 UTC 2003

I think that's reasonable.
aruba
response 8 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 22:28 UTC 2003

BTW the people in Lansing are fine with the mailing address being different
from the registered office.
richard
response 9 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 04:40 UTC 2003

yeah put the p.o. box  address.  the reason this is relevant is because of
what happened on mnet. The Arbornet corporate paperwork expired and whatever
grace period there was passed, and nobody seemed to know about it.  Why?
possibly because met's registered agent was still listed as Dave Cahill, and
who knows whether the state tried to send mail because Cahill's address was
still listed.
jep
response 10 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 00:03 UTC 2003

However exciting it might be to think otherwise, there are no 
insurmountable problems for Arbornet.  I just tossed in this note so 
that no one is misled here.  M-Net is going to be just fine.
jp2
response 11 of 12: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 01:27 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jesuit
response 12 of 12: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-12          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss