You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-47         
 
Author Message
aruba
Cyberspace Communications finances for 2006 Mark Unseen   Jan 11 03:41 UTC 2007

This is a special year-end report on Grex's finances for 2006.

Beginning Balance     $3,735.11

           Average        Total
           -------        -----

Credits    $330.00    $3,960.00     Membership dues
            $33.33      $400.00     Sale of old Sun equipment to mdw
            $20.00      $240.00     Miscellaneous donations
             $1.14       $13.62     Interest
             $0.20        $2.38     Silly Hat Fund
           -------    ---------
           $384.67    $4,616.00     

Debits     $100.00    $1,200.00     Colocation fees
            $48.33      $579.98     Phone bills
             $6.93       $83.17     Paypal discounts
             $3.33       $40.00     Rental of P.O. Box
             $2.49       $29.90     Fees to maintain our domain names
             $1.67       $20.00     Fees to maintain our corporate status 
           -------    ---------
           $162.75    $1,953.05     

Ending Balance        $6,398.06

We added 24 people to the membership rolls in 2006:

beebot, c3067692, charcat, cross, easlern, firewizz, glenda, jadecat, 
kaf28, kingjon, koppula, lapdragon, llama, lutefisk, matasw, mudlark, 
muthu, nharmon, pmakinen, ringbark, scholar, stefburn, steve, and walkman. 
Of those, 15 were still paid-up members at the end of the year.

At the beginning of 2006 we had 48 paid-up members.  At the end of 2006 we 
had 53 paid-up members.  We had an average of 49 paid-up members during the 
year.

Thanks to everyone who contributed to Grex in 2006:

ajax, arabella, arthurp, aruba, atticus, beebot, c3067692, chanur, charcat, 
coyote, cross, easlern, eskarina, firewizz, fitz, garrigan, gelinas, 
glenda, gorg, i, jadecat, janc, jason, jep, kaf28, kaplan, kedar, keesan, 
khamsun, kingjon, koppula, krj, lapdragon, llama, lutefisk, matasw, 
mbroggy, mbusse, mdw, mnac, mrtuna, muthu, naftee, nharmon, pengo, 
pmakinen, polygon, rcurl, remmers, ringbark, robfitz, scholar, scott, 
slynne, srw, stefburn, steve, trh, vortayne, walkman, wh, witling, wlevak, 
and a few more people who asked to remain anonymous.  Thanks all!
47 responses total.
aruba
response 1 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 03:44 UTC 2007

It seems pretty clear that Grex had a pretty good year, financially.  In
fact, a very good year.  We had twice as many new members as in 2005, and we
took in a lot more than we spent.  Thank you to everyone who supported Grex
in 2006!
cyklone
response 2 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 04:04 UTC 2007

But this is the people's money! If we have a surplus, we should give it back
and stimulate the economy.
cross
response 3 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 04:08 UTC 2007

Zing!
albaugh
response 4 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 22:36 UTC 2007

What is grex gonna do with that net gain of ~$2,500?
i
response 5 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 23:09 UTC 2007

Contract a sysadmin outsourcing firm in Bangladesh.
cross
response 6 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 23:49 UTC 2007

Burn!
aruba
response 7 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 05:18 UTC 2007

First, we should all take a deep breath, and feel good for a moment that
Grex did so well over the past year.  It hasn't always been the case, so we
deserve to enjoy it.

But absolutely, if there are problems we can solve by throwing a little
money at them, now is a good time to do that.  People have been talking
about a RAID array.  How much staff time will be required to install a RAID
array if we buy one?
cross
response 8 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 05:39 UTC 2007

It would be a fairly significant investment; essentially, the system would
have to be reinstalled onto it.  That might not be a bad thing, as grex is
due for an operating system upgrade anyway (it is now two OpenBSD releases
behind).
aruba
response 9 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 17:03 UTC 2007

Are there any system upgrades which require money but not significant time,
and after which the users will see an immediate improvement?
maus
response 10 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 17:06 UTC 2007

Very important technical purchase: send chocolate to all of the active
participants in the technical conferences
cmcgee
response 11 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 17:09 UTC 2007

Yes!! Feed them chocolate.  Improve their sense of well being!
mcnally
response 12 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 17:47 UTC 2007

 re #9:
 >  Are there any system upgrades which require money but not significant
 >  time, and after which the users will see an immediate improvement?

 /var/mail needs more disk space -- needs it badly.

 setting everything up on a high-performance RAID array would be nice
 but I guarantee we'll find uses for a spare disk if we wanted to buy
 one now and start using it for /var/mail until a more permanent solution
 comes along.
cross
response 13 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 18:13 UTC 2007

Regarding #9; McNally points out the need for additional mail spool space.
Actually, I'd say that the spool space isn't the problem so much as spam is;
if the spam problem could be brought under control, then space probably
wouldn't be such an issue.  To reiterate my ideas for controlling spam:

1) Make SpamAssassin (and the rest of the `standard' spam scanning tools)
   default for all users.  Users who wish to turn off spam scanning may do
   so by editing SpamAssassin configuration files.
2) Make *incoming* email `opt-in' for new users, with the *default* to be
   forwarding off-site.
3) Make outgoing email require some sort of automated verification process,
   or `sponsorship' by an existing member.

My suspicion is that the vast majority of legitimate users don't care about
email, and would not notice if their incoming email were simply turned off.
For those that do care, this would give sufficient coverage that they'd
still be able to do whatever they needed to do with a minimum of hassle and
user intervention.  I suspect that this scheme would more or less eliminate
the majority of the spam problem.

As for the RAID controller, I think I should clarify.  The incremental cost
of installing such a thing would Not add significantly to the overall cost
of doing a standard system upgrade.

I do, however, find it a bit disturbing that the major consideration for not
going with this improvement seems to be staff availability.  It speaks to
our lack of staff resources and our need to address that issue.  Of course,
the benefit to the users would be elimination of sources of downtime and
increased space/performance.
keesan
response 14 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 21:13 UTC 2007

At a recent board meeting it was suggested that everyone have incoming mail
for mail sent from grex, but not from the rest of the world, by default.
nharmon
response 15 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 21:24 UTC 2007

Yes, definetely keep local mail on by default. How else would new
members request mail access? :)
cross
response 16 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 22:40 UTC 2007

Right, that goes unsaid.
jep
response 17 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 13:27 UTC 2007

I got my annual notice from aruba that it's time to renew my membership.
 Well, I'm not sending in any money at this time.  When there's a need,
I'll send a contribution, but Grex has enough now to meet it's expenses
for years.
scholar
response 18 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 13:33 UTC 2007

Low-life.
mary
response 19 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 14:55 UTC 2007

And you know what?  If Grex was in need Jep would be there, as he said.  
That sounds like a nice deal, to me.  Thanks, John.
tod
response 20 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 15:21 UTC 2007

re #17
DITTO

re #19
Do I get a pat on the back, too? ;)
keesan
response 21 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 15:46 UTC 2007

If grex ever stops existing, would the savings account be donated some place
or split among current members?
nharmon
response 22 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 16:00 UTC 2007

http://cyberspace.org/local/grex/bylaws.html

  ARTICLE 8:  DISSOLVEMENT
 
  In the event the membership is unable to support Cyberspace
  Communications, all property belonging to the club shall be
  sold.  The remaining cash assets, after paying final bills, shall
  be donated to a charitable organization, as determined by the
  BOD.  All elected officers shall then be released from their
  obligations and the corporation dissolved.
easlern
response 23 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 18:40 UTC 2007

There's still hope, Sindi- maybe Grex can take out a very big life insurance
policy and something unfortunate could happen to him. . .


(I know a guy.)
mary
response 24 of 47: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 19:10 UTC 2007

What I will miss is John's being able to participate in our voting 
process.  That's one good reason for being a member and paying dues.
 0-24   25-47         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss