You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-186   
 
Author Message
jp2
jp2's Campaign Item Mark Unseen   Nov 19 02:27 UTC 2003

This item has been erased.

186 responses total.
jep
response 1 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 04:29 UTC 2003

The WWW page is pretty impressive.

There are things on which I agree with you, and things on which I 
disagree.  I think you're running a nice campaign.

There's a basic issue of Grex governance which I'd like to bring up 
with you.  On the Arbornet board, the Board members have traditionally 
*defined* policy.  On the Cyberspace board, the Board members *follow* 
policy; they generally act to implement a consensus of opinion for the 
users.  Were you to become a member of the Board, what would you see 
your role as being?  If your intention would be to define policy 
rather than follow it, would you expect the rest of the Board to 
follow suit?

Another question; your campaign material makes it seem that you're 
interested in winning a Board seat.  You're clearly viewing it as a 
competitive race, as opposed to offering yourself as a candidate and 
passively awaiting the vote of the membership.  Why is winning so 
important to you?  Why is Grex that important to you? 
gull
response 2 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 15:00 UTC 2003

Under a system where identification is not required for membership, how
would you propose to prevent people from using multiple usernames to buy
enough memberships to influence elections?  At a cost of only $6/vote,
and given the low turnout in some elections, it seems like this could be
a concern.
naftee
response 3 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 16:34 UTC 2003

re 0 Go away, David Irving.
jp2
response 4 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 16:52 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mynxcat
response 5 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 17:23 UTC 2003

Impressive campaign. Just a smally petty point. You state "The second, 
a far greater incentive, is use of outbound Internet access." As far 
as I know, I can still use lynx to surf the web if I want to, even if 
I'm not a member. It's outbound "telnet access" that is the incentive.

aruba
response 6 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 19:24 UTC 2003

I don't understand in what way you think Grex's accounting policies are not
"open" enough, Jamie.
cmcgee
response 7 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 19:58 UTC 2003

As far as I know, we require ID for membership because state law requires that
we have an accurate list of members.  

Controlling election outcomes is not the basis for this policy.
jp2
response 8 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 20:39 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 9 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 20:56 UTC 2003

Where did you get that requirement from, Jamie?
jp2
response 10 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 21:01 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

flem
response 11 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 21:28 UTC 2003

I have a question, Jamie.  What do you think is Grex's mission, and how
would your proposals help further that mission?
aruba
response 12 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 23:25 UTC 2003

It's true that we don't require addresses from all members (though we have
them for all but a couple).  We do, however, require enough identifying
information that we (or someone) could find addresses if necessary.

You didn't answer my question in #6.
willcome
response 13 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 23:49 UTC 2003

I have a question, Jamie:  Do you think the users of Grex will forget your
past abuses?
jp2
response 14 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 15:19 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 15 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 16:22 UTC 2003

Not to side-track Jamie's campaign, but I disagree that we need to switch to
the accrual method.  Yes, more detail could be available, but the cash method
_is_ acceptable accounting practice.
aruba
response 16 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 17:16 UTC 2003

> But the hardware, and Grex has quite a bit, is an asset and it is 
> not shown on the books.

A full list of Grex's hardware, with its estimated value, is online 
at http://www.cyberspace.org/~invent/index.html, as I've said many 
times.  It is available for anyone's perusal.

> The PayPal account is a liquid asset and really should be shown on 
> the balance sheet.

The contents of the paypal account is transferred to the checking 
account at the end of each month, so at the time of the reporting, the 
balance is $0.  The report always includes the amount of money which 
we received through Paypal each month.

> Income sitting in in the CafePress account is a long-term asset.

We have had no income from CafePress since Decemeber of last year, and 
we received a total of $80 before that.  I don't expect us to receive 
any more, unless something changes drastically.  If $25 accumulates in 
the account they will send us a check.  Otherwise, any balance 
disappears after 6 months.  The amount involved is too small to be 
worth the trouble of reporting what goes on before we actually get a 
check.

> Should Grex become an Amazon affiliate, the commissions become a 
> long-term asset and an Amazon honor system account is a current 
> account.

Grex is not an Amazon affiliate, and I don't remember that ever being 
discussed.
 
> Does Grex accept donations, via PayPal, in multiple currencies?

No.  Paypal takes care of any change of currency.

> Is Grex's insurance policy a dividend policy?  Can Grex take a loan 
> against it?  Is there any other aspect of the policy which suggests it 
> should be an asset rather than expense?

No, no, and no.

I see that you're having fun trying to make Grex's finances seem as 
complicated as you can imagine, but they're really not.  And what 
you're missing is that by making the treasurer's job more complicated, 
you will make it much harder to find anyone (or any group) willing to 
do the job.  From M-Net you should have learned that *that* is a much 
bigger problem than anything a more complicated accounting system 
would solve.

Any information on Grex's financial situation is available for the 
asking.

We *do* have a problem.  Not, as you incorrectly stated, because our 
membership has been dropping steadily.  It hasn't.  We were steady at 
about 100 members from 1995 through 2001, but in early 2002 we fell 
sharply to about 80 members, and have remained there ever since.  The 
number of members hasn't been falling, but it isn't quite enough to 
pay our bills, so our bank balance has been declining over the past 2 
years.  (And you would have understood that if you'd read the 
reports.)
cmcgee
response 17 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 17:22 UTC 2003

I don't see why complicating the bookkeeping system by going to an accrual
basis make sense for Grex.  
flem
response 18 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 17:47 UTC 2003

The part of the treasurer's job that deals with the actual finances of
grex is, as I recall, really quite simple.  The hard part of being
treasurer is the rest of it:  dealing with membership lists, trying to
get people to pay up, checking the PO box regularly, dealing with the
seemingly constant issues with SBC et al., and all the rest.  The
treasurer is Grex's mother; go ask your mother if balancing the
checkbook was the hard part of raising you.  :)

naftee
response 19 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 03:29 UTC 2003

re 16 Haven't GreX's expenses been rising too?
aruba
response 20 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 03:41 UTC 2003

No, Grex's expenses have been steady for a long time, except for a small
increase in our rent each year.  We just dropped 3 phone lines, so our
expenses will drop because of that.
willcome
response 21 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 04:03 UTC 2003

jp2, why should people vote for you, when you treated last year's election
as a joke?
keesan
response 22 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 12:19 UTC 2003

Don't forget the large increase in insurance costs.
aruba
response 23 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 15:07 UTC 2003

Yes, Sindi's correct.  The insurance costs went from $300/year in 199 and
2000, to $375/year in 2001, to $475/year in 2002, to $575/year in 2003.  I
had forgotten to include that.

There's a summary of our 2002 debits and credits in ~aruba/2002.txt .  I
plan to post a similar report for 2003 at the end of the year.
jp2
response 24 of 186: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 15:35 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-186   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss