You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-115      
 
Author Message
remmers
Nominations for the 2006 Grex Board of Directors Mark Unseen   Oct 22 18:45 UTC 2005

Nominations are now open for the Cyberspace Communications, Inc.
Board of Directors. In accordance with Article 4, Section d of
the Bylaws, nominations will close on November 15 and an online
election will be held December 1 through December 15. Terms of
office begin on January 1, 2006, and are two years in length.
Four seats are up for election this time around.

Any current member of Grex who has paid at least 3 months'
membership dues is eligible to run for and serve on the Board
unless they are currently serving and are completing the second
of two consecutive terms. (People in the latter group are
eligible to run again in next year's election if they are
still members at that time.)

The terms of three board members have one more year to run:
Joe Gelinas (gelinas), Steve Van Loon (vanloons), and David
Cahill (dpc).  Hence there is no point in nominating any of them.

The four board members whose terms end on December 31 are
S. Lynne Fremont (slynne), Mary Remmers (mary), Bruce Howard
(bhoward), and Larry Kestenbaum (polygon).  Mary Remmers is
completing the second of two consecutive terms and is
therefore *not* eligible to run this time, although she can
run in future elections.  The other three are completing a
first term and can run for re-election.

To appear on the ballot, a person must be nominated in this
item by November 15 and affirmatively accept the nomination
in this item before the start of voting on December 1.  Seconds
are not required.  Self-nominations are permitted.  
115 responses total.
remmers
response 1 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 18:46 UTC 2005

I'll start by nominating the three incumbents who are eligible
to run (slynne, bhoward, polygon), plus Mark Conger (aruba).
slynne
response 2 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 19:08 UTC 2005

I will accept my nomination and will second everyone else's there. 
naftee
response 3 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 20:04 UTC 2005

I nominate slynne, bhoward, polygon, and Mark Conger (aruba).
scholar
response 4 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 23:44 UTC 2005

I am more than happy to make the following nominations:  that of remmers (user
remmers), that of S. Lynne (user S. Lynne), and that of naftee (user asw).
naftee
response 5 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 21:54 UTC 2005

Because this item has been archived offsite so you can't erase it, I am
compelled to nominate our scholarly scholar.
nharmon
response 6 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 23:49 UTC 2005

I would like to nominate the following Grexers for the 2006 Grex Board
of Directors: 

Todd Plesco (tod)
Amichai Jeffrey Rollin (twenex)
Sean Granger (granger)
cross
response 7 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 00:20 UTC 2005

I'll second all of those.
cross
response 8 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 00:20 UTC 2005

(Wait, I can't; I'm not a member anymore.  Nevermind.)
naftee
response 9 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 00:59 UTC 2005

I nominate Dan Cross.
cross
response 10 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 02:12 UTC 2005

I respectfully decline.
scholar
response 11 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 03:27 UTC 2005

I'm nominating AND seconding all the following users:

naftee
nharmon
cross
cross
naftee
cross
nigger
response 12 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 06:40 UTC 2005

slynne is curropt and did bad things with volley, the only thing she should 
be running is fat ass to get on a diet. seriously slynne should be allowed
to run for anything she is a evil liar and not worthy to run.

scholar
response 13 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 07:04 UTC 2005

I would like to now adopt nigger as a nominated negro.
remmers
response 14 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 14:48 UTC 2005

Re #8:  You don't have to be a member to nominate people.
remmers
response 15 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 14:49 UTC 2005

I'll second (or third or whatever we're up to) the nomination of nharmon.
naftee
response 16 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 23:38 UTC 2005

I nominate Aitch (H) *hugs* remmers. (phD)
aruba
response 17 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 13:14 UTC 2005

I'd like to nominate John Remmers and Mike McNally.
mcnally
response 18 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 16:18 UTC 2005

 Thank you for the nomination but I respectfully decline.
bhoward
response 19 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 00:18 UTC 2005

I'd reconsider if I were you, Mike.  I think you would be a terrific
member of the board.  And the complications / cost of attending
meetings by long distance have eased tremendously with the advent
of iSight and Skype.
mcnally
response 20 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 00:37 UTC 2005

 Between work and house renovations I'm already fairly busy and am
 reluctant to add more time commitments when my recreation time is
 already regrettably scarce.  I've already got a volunteer role on
 Grex (as staff) that I so far haven't been able to give much time.

 I'm not sure how you manage it, Bruce, but I've also got concerns
 about the time zone factor.  With a four hour time shift between
 Ann Arbor and Alaska I fear weekday evening meetings would 
 conflict with the tail end of my workday.

 I'll reconsider in the future when the time commitment required by
 my house settles down a bit but at the moment I don't think it would
 be a good idea.
tod
response 21 of 115: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 18:50 UTC 2005

re #6
Unforutnately, I'm only volunteering for domestic NONprofit corporations at
this time.
Is Cyberspace, Inc the former ANEW, INC or am I mistaken?
(just kidding)

I accept the nomination.
naftee
response 22 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 1 05:36 UTC 2005

GOOD LUCJ THIS TIME AROUND< TOID
tod
response 23 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 1 17:06 UTC 2005

THANKS SOUP
scholar
response 24 of 115: Mark Unseen   Nov 1 19:12 UTC 2005

I'd like to announce that I support the todd campaign, though I don't think
he's done enough since the last election (where I also supported him) to sway
the opinions of thick-headed Grexers who don't seem to realise he's the best
thing that could possibly happen to Grex.

Todd, the issue of Grex crashing every two days seems to be more one to do
with PEOPLE than with technology.  It seems pretty clear that crashing every
two days is something indicative of a SERIOUS PROBLEM and that this serious
problem probably wouldn't be all that hard to fix.  However, Grex's staff
seems to insist on merely restarting the system every other day -- which,
probably, is going to end up taking up more time than merely fixing the
problem once and for all -- rather than trying to tackle the problem this all
poses.  What, as a board member, will YOU do to make sure the potentially
serious problem is fixed and will not cripple Grex?
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-115      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss