You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-72        
 
Author Message
ryan
Abusive users Mark Unseen   Aug 8 05:24 UTC 2005

This item has been erased.

72 responses total.
triludaa
response 1 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 07:47 UTC 2005

i think jason and i have the right to have a tel war late at night when  no
one is here and no one is fighting for resources.

i also think you are a gay little bitch but that is beside the point. 

neither jason nor i stopped any of the 10 users from doing anything they would
need to do.
scott
response 2 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 17:04 UTC 2005

Back when I was staff, I would have locked that account right away.  I
wouldn't make any assumption that it was a little private "for fun" battle,
either.  
albaugh
response 3 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 18:27 UTC 2005

Other than being childish (?) or annoying (?), what does that ps output imply
about affect on grex, really?
mcnally
response 4 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 18:32 UTC 2005

If the owner of the "jason" account complains to staff we'll certainly
take the matter under advisement.  Otherwise, what's the basis for the
complaint? 

More to the point, though, given that we have an open newuser policy
and newuser is currently enabled, what's the point of locking an account
supposed to be?  In the past it hasn't effectively deterred problem users
from coming back under other names, it's only made it harder for people
who want to ignore the problem user to do so by causing them to shift
login names periodically.

triludaa
response 5 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 20:29 UTC 2005

that's why you aren't currently on staff, scott. secondly you don't have the
temperment as a mcnally and you sir are altogether useless, scott.
so in short mcnally rules and scott suck dick and ryan is cry baby bitch.
scott
response 6 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 21:00 UTC 2005

Nope, I resigned from staff, for completely boring reasons such as "not
available to do any staff work".
mcnally
response 7 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 21:03 UTC 2005

 You're not really making much of a case in your own defense, are you?
 I believe you've got the potential to act like an intelligent, mature
 person.  It'd help things a lot if you decided to exercise that potential.

 Being curious about how the system works and wanting to learn are good
 things.  If it turns out that you ARE harassing users who don't welcome
 your tels, that's going to be a bad thing.  I'm currently inclined to
 defend your "right" (for lack of a better word) to explore the system
 but if I conclude that you're seriously harassing people I assure you
 that my sympathy would be with them, rather than you..

 In the meantime, nothing anybody has said yet has demonstrated to me that
 you're causing any serious harassment or disruption and you've been polite
 and responsive when we've talked about things like your runaway CPU job
 the other day.  I hope that things will continue on that basis and that you
 continue to enjoy grex by learning about the system.  Please don't put me
 in a position of having to protect other users from your experiments.
mcnally
response 8 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 21:04 UTC 2005

 re #6:  Scott slipped in, my #7 was (obviously, I hope) intended for
 triludaa's benefit.

ryan
response 9 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 00:29 UTC 2005

This response has been erased.

mcnally
response 10 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 00:31 UTC 2005

 Well, that seems clear enough.
naftee
response 11 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 02:40 UTC 2005

Yeah ; it's clear that jason decides to wait seven hours before complaining
in the system problems item.
triludaa
response 12 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 03:27 UTC 2005

hum, jason, and you sent me no tels nor did you send me 430 emails marked from
me to me, get real man. seriously. you can give but you can't take? check the
mail logs and you will see. however, the real thing here is this, like life
there will be several things that happen to you that you don't like. you have
ways around them. cutting an account is one and perhaps the most foolish of
them all. crying like jason after doing the same things is stupid. you can
take view as i shall do: what jason and i did was foolish, yet fun; no one
got hurt, no one died and i consider the issue dead. if you check the mail
logs and you find i got the amount of mail i said i did, you track it jason,
you come to me and say do i wish to complain? i will say no, i am a big boy
and i can handle myself, thanks! good day to you, sir.
scholar
response 13 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 06:08 UTC 2005

Re. 10:  Does it?  How do we know jason didn't originally consent to the
tels, and only later, as a way to get triluda in trouble, claim he objected
to it?
triludaa
response 14 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 07:56 UTC 2005

i forgot i had putty logging turn on. so if you'd like to see tel for tel mail
for mail what went down i have a full record of it. i am sure you can easily
match this with the write logs and the logs for mail. what seems cloudy is
often muddy. what is clear though is ryan is stalking me: ryan:     !cat
triludaa.log
naftee
response 15 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 12:34 UTC 2005

No such file or directory
mcnally
response 16 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 17:06 UTC 2005

 re #13, #10:  I meant it seems clear enough that a complaint has been made.
ryan
response 17 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 16:49 UTC 2005

This response has been erased.

nharmon
response 18 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 17:27 UTC 2005

It appears that triluda is accusing you of spamming his e-mail account.
My suggestion would be that you just filter his mail, and be done with it.
triludaa
response 19 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 18:24 UTC 2005

either that or you quit spamin' my email from another shell account, i already
have seen how childish you can be about your party bot, so i know you aren't
beyound reproach. perhaps you can have your mother come in here and defend
you on the fact you didn't send me spam from #shell.be
triludaa
response 20 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 18:26 UTC 2005

i would also like to ask how your party bot was acceptable. i saved all those
emails and many posted where the request were made from, i bet you have a
connection to #shell.be ssh 217.22.55.50 and that's what my email suggest.
then it states a fact or two, you are a shitbag so is the person who hatched
you.
mcnally
response 21 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 00:06 UTC 2005

re #17:
> Attached below is a harassing email sent to me by triludaa.  This type of
> behavior is completely unacceptable.  Again I ask, why is this person still
> allowed to come here? 

What do you propose we do?  Lock his account and shut down newuser?  Forever?

The bottom-line answer to your question "why is this person still allowed to
come here?" is this:  Grex runs an open system.  We let *everyone* come here.
We do hope that people observe a modicum of decorum but so far nothing anyone
has credibly accused him of amounts to more than petty harassment and poor
taste -- not enough to be worth compromising the system's goals of open access.


> All he does is cause trouble for everybody.

Curiously he seems to mostly cause trouble for you and jason and based on
his responses to your allegations I'd say he makes a reasonable case that the
trouble-causing is mutual.  If you kids insist on making a stink that bothers
the other users then somebody from staff (not me -- I don't believe banning
users is effective) may take it on themselves to act but with the mutual
accusations that have been made don't assume that you'll be happy with the
results if that occurs.  

Meanwhile if you want to e-mail me privately I would be happy to show you
how to use tools already available on Grex to:

  a)  block triludaa from sending tels or writes to you
  b)  block triludaa from sending e-mail to you via an e-mail blacklist
  c)  block everyone except pre-arranged senders from sending e-mail to
      you via an e-mail whitelist.
  d)  block response from triludaa in party and bbs.


The system's more than big enough for both of you if you'll just drop your
juvenile little feud and with a little bit of effort either one of you can
end it unilaterally.  Why not do that?

ryan
response 22 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 01:25 UTC 2005

This response has been erased.

triludaa
response 23 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 01:29 UTC 2005

 Again I find Mcnally a bless for grex. Not because he appears to support me,
because he doesn't he supports a free system and has a level head. This staff
memeber (Mcnally) is a role model for all want to be staff for grex. I have
not complained on anyone, nor have i asked for staff to contact the other
shell that the emails came from, i am not seeking their help on this matter
because I realize ryan is being a child. I also realize I have the right and
the ability to take care of my party, bbs, mail and tels on grex and shouldn't
trouble staff for something I can do. I also don't have this lock and reap
account theory that seemed to be big at some time on grex. I for one will drop
the issue and not reply back to ryan who appears to only be childish to me.
I do say, however, if you wish to kill my account you should at least get my
saved log on both jason and ryan which includes all tels and mails.
good day to you ryan. 
keesan
response 24 of 72: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 01:48 UTC 2005

Please explain how to block the telegrams, which get in the way when I am
trying to read the web.  I know how to block emails but don't have any
objection to conducting a discussion via email.  I don't want to block all
telegrams because I meet some interesting people from other countries.  
 0-24   25-49   50-72        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss