You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-9          
 
Author Message
polytarppe
I would like an apology. Mark Unseen   Feb 15 23:27 UTC 2005

Hi!

Recently, in regards to the wolfcat/hayz3141 debacle, Steve' ANdre sent the
following E-mail:

STeve Andre' wrote:

>Hello, I'm STeve Andre', one of the system administrators of Grex,
>an open access computer conferencing / web forum system.
>
>We have a troublesome individual in our community who does
>various things to cause problems for people.  This persons
>latest antics involve you--
>
>From his gmail account he sent one of our users mail claiming
>child pornography was on the account of a user.  This is
>completely false, and this person (polytarp@gmail.com) is not
>and never will be a part of the Grex staff.
>
>We hope you inform this person that such activities are bad
>form at least, possibly illegal and certainly a violation of your
>conditions of use.
>
>If you have any questions, please send them to security@grex.org
>so all the staff can read this.  Baff@grex.org includes our board
>of directors.
>
>Thanking you,   STeve Andre'  (Grex staff)

Needless to say, it WASN"T me who caused a problem, as was verified by Steve
Van Loons:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Steve Van Loon <svanloon@yahoo.com>
To: baff@grex.org, hayz3141@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:12:35 -0500
Subject: Re: Fwd: help with Ftp Login.
Steve Andre,
   I think you misread the email.  It's not polytarp at all that was
involved in this.  It was hayz.  I think that polytarp shouldn't be
punished with possibly loosing his account on gmail.  However, I also
feel that hayz3141's account being inactivated it kind of silly.  He can
always create a new account and do the samething as hayz1732.  If that
account is turned off, then he can create a new account with a similar
login.  I don't know what an appropriate action is, but I don't think
that inactivating hayz3141 and for that matter triluda isn't the
appropriate action.

--Steve Van Loon

STeve Andre' wrote:


Frankly, Steve', I think an apology is in order.
9 responses total.
scholar
response 1 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 23:29 UTC 2005

I agree that Steve' should apologize to polytarp.  Having a staff member libel
you is NOT a good thing.
tod
response 2 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 23:37 UTC 2005

And what is that nonsense about "is not and never will be a part of the Grex
staff."?  As if Steve' owns Grex and is omniscient enough to know who polytarp
is.
naftee
response 3 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 00:10 UTC 2005

I think this is another case of staff trying to harass the users again :(
scholar
response 4 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 02:19 UTC 2005

vanloons: hayz fooled someone into thinking he was an admin of the system.
hayz then sent an email saying that the guy's
          account was suspended for child porn.  Nothing of the sort had
happened.  It's just that hayz fooled this guy.
          Then the guy over reacted.
vanloons: andre picked the wrong person to blame it on.
emunerd:   i am confused :/
tod:      steve andre' browbeat scholar because steve' is incapable of reading
a paragraph of English.
<emunerd sighs>
emunerd:   scholar and hayz are two separate people
krj:       Personally I favor the m-net solution.
vanloons: dont' worry about it.  the end result is that Hayz is a goofball.
Polytarp/mfp/scholar although and idiot, was
          innocent in this case and andre made a mistake.
tod:      and then he said "he will NEVER be on grex staff" like Steve is some
sort of wizard of staff hexes and curses
krj:       Siteban all sites scholar uses.
vanloons: What's the m-net solution?
emunerd:   i see is hayz suspended?
vanloons: what does this have to do with scholar?
vanloons: Scholar didn't do anything.
spooked
response 5 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 14:23 UTC 2005

I think it is a logical conclusion that so long as their are some sane and 
responsible folk on staff that polytarp will not be permitted to join the 
ranks.  Though, *never*, is a long time!  I'm sure STeve will apologise if 
their is legitimate case for an apology being warranted.


albaugh
response 6 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 19:53 UTC 2005

polytarp and all its hayz de-incarnations is welcome to smooch the collective
/dev/null of grex.
other
response 7 of 9: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 12:36 UTC 2005

Well put.
jesuit
response 8 of 9: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:15 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
scholar
response 9 of 9: Mark Unseen   Aug 5 00:46 UTC 2006

lol
 0-9          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss