Grex Coop13 Conference Item 146

0-12

Author

Message

jp2

A question for the board

Mar 12 11:16 UTC 2004

This item has been erased.

12 responses total.

slynne

response 1 of 12:

Mar 12 15:52 UTC 2004

I dont feel that it is necessary. That is why I havent brought it up 
anyways. I believe in consequences that are in line with a person's 
actions. I dont think that the "property" that was destroyed had much 
value. Or at least not enough to file criminal charges.

other

response 2 of 12:

Mar 12 16:08 UTC 2004

If property can be considered a resource, jp2 is far more liable 
for destruction of Grex resources than is valerie.  If any action 
be taken against valerie, it had better be taken against jp2 first.
(And polytarp etc. before either of them.)

jp2

response 3 of 12:

Mar 12 19:36 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tod

response 4 of 12:

Mar 12 20:37 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

salad

response 5 of 12:

Mar 13 01:23 UTC 2004

re 3 Seeing as you filled up GreX's partitions may times (cf rational's item) I
think the board has lots of grounds for any charges.

rational

response 6 of 12:

Mar 13 01:43 UTC 2004

I agree with saladman (a good jewish name) 's legal analysis of the situation
at hand and at foot.

salad

response 7 of 12:

Mar 13 01:48 UTC 2004

Indeed, rational, as his name suggests, is thinking rationally when he warns us
of irrational behaviour.

jp2

response 8 of 12:

Mar 13 01:53 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rational

response 9 of 12:

Mar 13 01:54 UTC 2004

jp2 is a Paki terrorist hacker.

salad

response 10 of 12:

Mar 13 01:55 UTC 2004

re 8 Are you sure you didn't fill up any partitions when you sent your 900 or
so e-mails, hmm?

jp2

response 11 of 12:

Mar 13 04:41 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jesuit

response 12 of 12:

May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

0-12

Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In