|
Grex > Coop13 > #138: Coop Conference Courtesy Proposal - Descriptive titles | |
|
| Author |
Message |
ea
|
|
Coop Conference Courtesy Proposal - Descriptive titles
| 
Mar 10 04:38 UTC 2004 |
This is NOT a member proposal to be voted on, merely a suggestion.
Lately, there have been a lot of "Member Proposals" and "Proposed Bylaw
Changes". I'd like to request that when posting such an item, you give
it a title such as "Member Proposal: Goal of the proposal"
For example:
Member Proposal: Change the Root Password
or
Bylaw Ammendment: Voting Procedure Changes
or
Member Proposal: Colocation
This would make it much easier to read through coop, and would probably
save everyone a bit of time.
|
| 18 responses total. |
cmcgee
|
|
response 1 of 18:
|
Mar 10 16:47 UTC 2004 |
Nice idea!
|
aruba
|
|
response 2 of 18:
|
Mar 10 17:04 UTC 2004 |
I agree - that's a good idea. And it's possible to change item titles with
Backtalk.
|
remmers
|
|
response 3 of 18:
|
Mar 10 17:33 UTC 2004 |
So the fairwitness could do it.
|
mary
|
|
response 4 of 18:
|
Mar 10 18:13 UTC 2004 |
I agree, it would be nice. But I really don't want to see the
FWs getting into changing user's text, so I'd like to see
the header of an item left to the poster, who may or may
not want to follow this suggestion.
|
other
|
|
response 5 of 18:
|
Mar 10 18:27 UTC 2004 |
Don't some Backtalk interfaces allow the user to change item titles for
their own viewing?
|
tod
|
|
response 6 of 18:
|
Mar 10 18:57 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 7 of 18:
|
Mar 10 19:16 UTC 2004 |
If it's a stupid insistence that Grex censors its users use:
"Entered by Todd,Seattle,866-867-5245,866-867-5245 (tod)"
|
tod
|
|
response 8 of 18:
|
Mar 10 19:26 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 9 of 18:
|
Mar 10 21:12 UTC 2004 |
If the item author won't retitle it to what everyone wants, the FW will just
remove it.
|
tod
|
|
response 10 of 18:
|
Mar 10 21:23 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 11 of 18:
|
Mar 10 21:26 UTC 2004 |
Why use symbols that people will forget the meaning of, instead of the words
themselves?
|
tod
|
|
response 12 of 18:
|
Mar 10 21:31 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
salad
|
|
response 13 of 18:
|
Mar 10 22:14 UTC 2004 |
UNLUCKY
|
rational
|
|
response 14 of 18:
|
Mar 10 23:56 UTC 2004 |
Re. 11: words are symbols, girly.
|
sholmes
|
|
response 15 of 18:
|
Mar 11 03:07 UTC 2004 |
Or a separate conference for member proposals itself.
|
twenex
|
|
response 16 of 18:
|
Mar 11 14:06 UTC 2004 |
If you use "#" people will argue over its name.
|
salad
|
|
response 17 of 18:
|
Mar 11 15:00 UTC 2004 |
F#CK
|
jesuit
|
|
response 18 of 18:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|